How to drive an irrational leftist insane

[The Duke]

That's exactly how it works. An ex-president, who's now just a private citizen like you and I, who has no security clearance, has no authority to access classified intel. No less store them in their personal, unsecured residence.

False. Presidents retain their security clearance because they may be called upon in an advisory manner.

https://archive.is/T7geV

 

[Marener]

That's not the same thing?

It’s not! Judicial Watch wanted to force the archivist to do something. The court noted that the enforcement mechanism in the PRA is not obligatory, it’s at the discretion of the archivist.

From the case:
The PRA authorizes NARA to invoke the same enforcement mechanism embodied in the Federal Records Act, which begins with a request to the Attorney General to institute an action for the recovery of missing records. Compare44 U.S.C. § 2112(c) with 44 U.S.C. § 3106. The statute does not mandate that NARA invoke this enforcement scheme but rather vests complete discretion with the agency to utilize that mechanism. 44 U.S.C. § 2112(c) (“When the Archivist considers it to be in the public interest, he may ....” (emphasis added)). The Archivist has chosen to invoke the mechanism in the past when it deemed such action appropriate. See, e.g., United States v. McElvenny, No. 02–3027, 2003 WL 1741422(S.D.N.Y. April 1, 2003) (seeking recovery of a map of Cuba annotated by President John F. Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis).

 

[Faun]

False. Presidents retain their security clearance because they may be called upon in an advisory manner.

That's not the same thing?

You moron. A president never has a "formal" security clearance. So they have nothing to retain when they leave office. If they're called upon for some reason, the current president grants them access as needed. In Trump's case, Biden said he would not do that.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/08/25/trump-classified-legal/

Said Priess: “There’s a myth out there that presidents have a formal security clearance. They don’t.”

The “commander in chief has the ability to classify or declassify documents,” Priess said, by virtue of having been elected president by the American people. “A former president might receive access to limited classified material after leaving office to assist with writing memoirs or at the discretion of the current president, but a formal security clearance isn’t involved.”​

 

[j-mac]

What is a 'taint team'?

That's what the FBI was arguing it could safely look through the boxes seized and. THEY would give back what they wanted to....Refer to the above post from the 4th Circuit and read that, then get back to me....

 

[g5000]

How to drive an irrational leftist insane​

You know how to drive a Trump cultist insane?

Indict Trump.

 

[g5000]

How to drive an irrational leftist insane​

You know how to drive a Trump cultist insane?

Beat Trump by 7 million popular votes and 74 electoral votes.

 

[BackAgain]

You know how to drive a Trump cultist insane?

Indict Trump.

Not at all. I’ve been expecting it.

An honestly based one, of course, was never going to happen.

 

[BackAgain]

You know how to drive a Trump cultist insane?

Beat Trump by 7 million popular votes and 74 electoral votes.

Allegedly.

 

[OKTexas]

Yes.
They just don't go looking for them if they haven't committed another crime.

So you answer is no, GOT IT! LMFAO

.

 

[OKTexas]

Have it your way 'Fuckface of the Forest', all her decisions were reversed. And that is a total dressing down of this 'conflict of interest' *****!

One more thing, **** you for defending this ****!

Poor little commie, how about you provide a link that proves "all of her decisions" have been reversed. She's been on the bench for quite a while now, so I think you're lying.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Earth to mary ... Trump's not the president anymore. He can no longer decide which classified documents he wasn't to keep at Mar-a-Raided.

He was president when the documents were moved commie. What about that do you not get?

.

 

[OKTexas]

Good news! The federal search warrant said what they’re looking for and seized what they stipulated in the warrant.

There’s no reason to believe the evidence seized can’t be allowed as evidence.

Well that's just a lie, was his passport stipulated in the warrant?

.

 

[OKTexas]

That's exactly how it works. An ex-president, who's now just a private citizen like you and I, who has no security clearance, has no authority to access classified intel. No less store them in their personal, unsecured residence.

Actually ex presidents can receive classified briefings. Any more propaganda you want to push?

.

 

[j-mac]

You know how to drive a Trump cultist insane?

Indict Trump.

You have to have more than a TDS ridden prosecutor, and J6 outrage to get the job done….

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

So you answer is no, GOT IT! LMFAO

.

BS, they can be arrested and held, after being pulled over for a bad tail light.

 

[Faun]

He was president when the documents were moved commie. What about that do you not get?

And had to return all classified documents upon leaving office.

 

[Faun]

Actually ex presidents can receive classified briefings. Any more propaganda you want to push?

They can receive classified briefings only IF the current president let's them. Biden said "no" to Trump, for example.

 

[Marener]

Well that's just a lie, was his passport stipulated in the warrant?

.

It wasn’t, but you know what was? The contents of the container the classified documents are in.

Know why they do that? Because if the contents of the container are items that Trump had been using, it’s evidence that he was in contact and working with the classified documents.

So in that sense, his passports are evidence of a crime.

 

[Billo_Really]

That's what the FBI was arguing it could safely look through the boxes seized and. THEY would give back what they wanted to....Refer to the above post from the 4th Circuit and read that, then get back to me....

That doesn't tell me what a 'taint team' is. If you don't know, just say so.

 

[Billo_Really]

Poor little commie, how about you provide a link that proves "all of her decisions" have been reversed. She's been on the bench for quite a while now, so I think you're lying.

.

I already have!

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article269511242.html