SoÂ… let's look at this from another perspective. When people say they believe in an entity that cannot be seen, cannot be felt, exists outside of the natural realm in an asserted supernatural realm, that has attributes we need to worship but cannot understand or even describe, who lives in eternity in both directions, who can create existence from nothing and is uncreated himself and uses methods and means we can never know or hope to understand, that stands outside proof which is exactly why it's for certain he exists-- I would say you thumpers need to examine your comments regarding rationality.
and I would say that for someone to argue it is irrational to believe something without proof and then to claim "there is no god" is a a rational conclusion, they are demonstrating the ultimate in the irrational.......
That's why most atheists say Agnostic Atheism is the most rational position to have. We don't know what is on the other side of black holes but the fact is my friend, neither do you guys. To say you know a god is on the other side makes you crazy. We understand the chances of there being a god are slim to nill. He has never talked to anyone, miracles don't happen and every religion on earth is made up by man. So without any proof of a god, the most rational position to have is there probably isn't a god but we will remain open to the possibility if any proof is ever given.
There is no evidence to support any of the claims made in the Bible concerning the existence of a god. Any ‘evidence’ proposed by theists to support the Bible’s various historical and supernatural claims is non-existent at best, manufactured at worst.
The Bible is historically inaccurate, factually incorrect, inconsistent and contradictory. It was artificially constructed by a group of men in antiquity and is poorly translated, heavily altered and selectively interpreted. Entire sections of the text have been redacted over time.
There is no contemporary evidence for JesusÂ’ existence or the BibleÂ’s account of his life; no artefacts, dwellings, works of carpentry, self-written manuscripts, court records, eyewitness testimony, official diaries, birth records, reflections on his significance or written disputes about his teachings. Nothing survives from the time in which he is said to have lived.
All historical references to Jesus derive from hearsay accounts written decades or centuries after his supposed death.
So since every religion are made up fairy tales, what other "EVIDENCE" do you have besides those lies? None?
The existence and non-existence of a god are not equally probable outcomes. The majority of things we can possibly imagine do not exist. Thus, belief is not as valid a position as skepticism when dealing with unsupported or unfalsifiable claims. Agnostic atheism is the most rational position.