CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 153,042
- 78,248
- 2,645
Proteins evolve faster than DNA.
DNA has repair mechanisms.
Proteins only have chaperones.
And DNA "evolved" from amino acids who "evolved" from molecules?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Proteins evolve faster than DNA.
DNA has repair mechanisms.
Proteins only have chaperones.
Wiki is not an authoritative source of scientific information.you may want to convey that to the evolutionists,,
as shown in the link I provided they have a different opinion than you,,
Maybe. Purines and pyrimidines may have been catalyzed by glycine small chains. It certainly happens in the laboratory. Copper ions are more efficient though.And DNA "evolved" from amino acids who "evolved" from molecules?
Wiki is not an authoritative source of scientific information.
Caudipteryx is a bird, not a lizard. It has gastroliths.
I am not responsible for other peoples' stupidity. It doesn't necessarily equate with fraud.
Maybe. Purines and pyrimidines may have been catalyzed by glycine small chains. It certainly happens in the laboratory. Copper ions are more efficient though.
From Quanta Magazine?![]()
How Dinosaurs Shrank and Became Birds
Modern birds appeared to emerge in a snap of evolutionary time. But new research illuminates the long series of evolutionary changes that made the transformation possiblewww.scientificamerican.com
No. Your math stinks. You're wrong.No no no no no no maybes here!
This is science, remember?
What are the odds against molecules completely randomly forming perfectly functioning proteins?
The odds against 52 lines of random computer code forming a perfectly functioning operating system are 8.065*10^67
Thank you for making my point!No. Your math stinks. You're wrong.
You think you can write an operating system in 52 lines of code?
Let's see you do it.
always with the deflection,,From Quanta Magazine?
No offense, but they're right up there with the Enquirer.
I'd have to disagree (strongly) with whoever wrote that article.
For some people, anything that lived in Jurassic Park is dinosaur.
I try to be a little more precise.
What point?Thank you for making my point!
Collagen?always with the deflection,,
why is your religion any different than theirs??
T. Rex Linked to Chickens, Ostriches
www.smithsonianmag.com
You're like a fucking leftard. You watch CNN and you think they're telling you the truth.always with the deflection,,
why is your religion any different than theirs??
T. Rex Linked to Chickens, Ostriches
www.smithsonianmag.com
are you feeling OK??You're like a fucking leftard. You watch CNN and you think they're telling you the truth.
You don't make inferences about DNA from collagen. No reputable scientist would do such a thing, and if they do, they're not reputable.
Try not to succumb to the click bait.
god??Now let's get back to the topic.
How is it, do you suppose, that proteins evolve faster than DNA?
You're the one wallowing in garbage.are you feeling OK??
you seem to be having a breakdown and saying incoherent things,,
I will leave you alone in your own misery,,
God dunnit is not a scientific answer.god??
opinions vary,,God dunnit is not a scientific answer.
Not really.opinions vary,,