So lets see you are anti abortion and yet you do not believe in helping infants if in need of food, healthcare, or a roof over their head, or even a clean environment (I am talking about Hud) conducive for them to become healthy and happy productive well educated adults?
I'd say your responsible is to keep your opinions to yourself then, you have no right to be anti abortion due to the fact you are not pro life.
Can't afford a kid. Easy solution. Don't have sex.
No - PROTECT YOURSELF.
Sadly, the states that promote abstinence only education have the highest rates of teen pregnancy.
Just ask Bristol Palin how abstinence works.
Abstinence has never worked. The number of six month term babies born to newlyweds has been constant since the beginning of marriage. Really big healthy six month babies. It happened in colonial America. It happened in my parents' generation and it still happens now. The trick is, do you take responsibility for what you have done? Do you find a way to bring this child into a world where it will be provided for and loved, raised with commitment, or do you terminate this seed of potential as the kinder and more responsible thing to do? Neither is an easy decision, and people don't ADVOCATE abortion--the advocate the right of CHOICE.
I wouldn't be opposed to changing the on-demand term limit to five months, unless the child or mother's life is a serious factor.