Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 19,762
- 35,895
- 2,430
How Many Times Are We Going to Let the FBI and DOJ Break the Law?
17 Nov 2021 ~~ By Scott HounsellIt seems I can’t keep up with the latest DOJ or FBI scandal as of late. In the last two weeks, I have penned two pieces at RedState, voicing my displeasure with their continued political targeting and questionable tactics.
While some missed my sarcasm regarding the “J. Edgar glory days,” the problems at the FBI and DOJ, along with other federal law enforcement organizations (I’m looking at you, ATF), are nothing new. While this author is going to stop far short of suggesting that the likes of McVeigh and Nichols had justification to do what they did, one can certainly step back and look at the actions taken at Ruby Ridge and Waco, and question whether or not any government should have the power to take that sort of action against their own citizens.
One can still be as disgusted by the action of domestic terrorists with a Ryder truck, as we are by domestic terrorists with blue jackets with bold yellow lettering. Look at what the FBI did to Richard Jewell, in the wake of the Centennial Park Bombing, despite having zero evidence of any wrongdoing. In fact, the entirety of what linked Jewell to the bombing was geographic proximity and a single FBI profiler’s opinion. That’s it.
We found out from the 9/11 Commission Report that the FBI was responsible for some of the breakdown in communication that could have potentially helped to stop several of the hijackers leading up to the attacks. Remember, Zacarias Moussaoui, sometimes referred to as the 20th hijacker was picked up by the FBI in August 2001, but was not linked to the other hijackers until after the 9/11 attacks.
Yet it doesn’t stop there. The FBI had contacted and/or investigated the Tsarnaev Brothers — perpetrators of the Boston Bombing in 2013, Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik — perpetrators of the San Bernardino Shooting in 2015, and Omar Mateen — perpetrator of the Pulse Nightclub shooting in 2016, all before any of those crimes were committed.
Even after crimes are committed, the FBI (and by extension, the DOJ) seem completely incapable of securing evidence of a motive or how the perpetrators had committed the crimes. In the case of Stephen Paddock, the entirety of our domestic federal law enforcement power couldn’t figure out how a guy, or better yet, why a guy, got an armory into a tower room at the Mandalay Bay, and murdered and injured hundreds.
~Snip~
We need strong leaders who will call out the corruption and then refuse to move on anything until that corruption is fully investigated by an independent party and the involved parties prosecuted to the furthest extent of the law.
Let’s start there, but as our Forefathers taught us, no option is off the table.
Comment:
Time and time again we have found that the FBI has been involved either by contact with individuals or groups that have committed terrorist attacks against America and this agency has been supposedly caught flat-footed.
The author has indicated just some of incidents., but there are a multitude incidents that there have exposed FBI involvement, including the failed coup d' etat.
IAs I have indicated in past posts, the FBI has within my lifetime changed, Surely the still get involved with kidnapping, bank robberies, and domestic terror.
As we are consistently denied our Constitutional and it's Amendments, our rights are consigned to the trash, while the FBI and other alphabet agencies laugh up their sleeves at we citizens, I do think, that this is, indeed, a hill worth dying on, or, better making them die on.
IMO, the FBI has been weaponized and infiltrated by Progressive Marxists.
Who's gonna arrest the sheriff and his gang of thieves? All Federal law enforcement falls under the Executive and our Dear Leader. So, there’s really nothing the people can do right now. Are there any “take no prisoners” type leaders in the house?