Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If you want to break the power of the parties, support public financing of elections. As long as money is considered speech, getting a third party going is just wishful thinking.
The Rs&Ds are laughing all the way to bank at your expense.LOL... Now there's a belly laff!If you want to break the power of the parties, support public financing of elections. As long as money is considered speech, getting a third party going is just wishful thinking.
actually, you would want to support revoking those laws in each state the places the parties in charge of who can run for office. This country was founded on free and fair elections, with the founders envisioning citizen service......AS it stands, when a very popular independant begins to threaten the monopoly, the parties raise the threshold for entry into the debates.If you want to break the power of the parties, support public financing of elections. As long as money is considered speech, getting a third party going is just wishful thinking.
... are going to vote for Democrats or Republicans in the next election?
When will we learn?
actually, you would want to support revoking those laws in each state the places the parties in charge of who can run for office. This country was founded on free and fair elections, with the founders envisioning citizen service......AS it stands, when a very popular independant begins to threaten the monopoly, the parties raise the threshold for entry into the debates.If you want to break the power of the parties, support public financing of elections. As long as money is considered speech, getting a third party going is just wishful thinking.
It is wrong and it needs to stop.
Tell Me why it is then that an independent need 60k registrations compared to the GOP's 600? Or the Dems 600? And that is just in PA...other states have similar restrictions.actually, you would want to support revoking those laws in each state the places the parties in charge of who can run for office. This country was founded on free and fair elections, with the founders envisioning citizen service......AS it stands, when a very popular independant begins to threaten the monopoly, the parties raise the threshold for entry into the debates.If you want to break the power of the parties, support public financing of elections. As long as money is considered speech, getting a third party going is just wishful thinking.
It is wrong and it needs to stop.
If any third party could actually gather enough grassroots support to be relevant, they could easily force their way into the debates.
The problem isn't the parties, it's the people who follow them.
Tell Me why it is then that an independent need 60k registrations compared to the GOP's 600? Or the Dems 600? And that is just in PA...other states have similar restrictions.actually, you would want to support revoking those laws in each state the places the parties in charge of who can run for office. This country was founded on free and fair elections, with the founders envisioning citizen service......AS it stands, when a very popular independant begins to threaten the monopoly, the parties raise the threshold for entry into the debates.If you want to break the power of the parties, support public financing of elections. As long as money is considered speech, getting a third party going is just wishful thinking.
It is wrong and it needs to stop.
If any third party could actually gather enough grassroots support to be relevant, they could easily force their way into the debates.
The problem isn't the parties, it's the people who follow them.
In Florida, the GOP set the standard at 1% of the registered voters to get into the televised debates...when independants were hititng that, they upped it to 7 pecent...now its at 15...
As long as the parties can make the rules, we will have ONLY the two parties to vote for.
2... are going to vote for Democrats or Republicans in the next election?
When will we learn?
... are going to vote for Democrats or Republicans in the next election?
When will we learn?
... are going to vote for Democrats or Republicans in the next election?
When will we learn?
No worries, the Libertopians infected most parties available. You can go several different ways.
actually, you would want to support revoking those laws in each state the places the parties in charge of who can run for office. This country was founded on free and fair elections, with the founders envisioning citizen service......AS it stands, when a very popular independant begins to threaten the monopoly, the parties raise the threshold for entry into the debates.If you want to break the power of the parties, support public financing of elections. As long as money is considered speech, getting a third party going is just wishful thinking.
It is wrong and it needs to stop.
If any third party could actually gather enough grassroots support to be relevant, they could easily force their way into the debates.
The problem isn't the parties, it's the people who follow them.
... are going to vote for Democrats or Republicans in the next election?
When will we learn?
No worries, the Libertopians infected most parties available. You can go several different ways.
Are you trying to express actual ideas?
If both parties live up to recent history and try to out-leftist each other in their nominations then no matter whether you vote D or R you get a liberal. You can't win. So voting for a third party candidate is no more of a waste than voting for the "mainstream".
But to just stay home is chicken.