How many of our MAGA members agree with Tucker Carlson? Tucker Carlson: "USA cannot win a conventional war against the Moscow empire."

[Blisterfinger]

Will Trump Administration beat Moscow empire ? If yes, how, whats Trump´s master plan ?

Is the Trump Administration trying to beat the Moscow Empire?

 

[Litwin]

That is correct.

wrong again

the reality :

Is the Trump Administration trying to beat the Moscow Empire?

I know that many of our members dont understand TRUMP-Reagan strategical game against MOSCOW empire . BRENT OIL TODAY - 62 $ (Urals is much cheaper ) and “Saudi Arabia is ready to reduce oil prices to $50. AS I wrote before , With cost of “black gold” at 15-23 dollars per barrel, the USSR imperial economy collapsed, and the USSR empire itself collapsed, and the "golden" horde (Moscow empire) budget can only be fulfilled only with oil price at $ 42.4 and higher
Donald Trump wants to cut global oil prices in half (it's less than $30 US for Urals). If he does so, Moscow's empire won't survive his four years in office.
and this is the Trump´s peace plan

"I suggest that President TRUMP might want to study how Ronald Reagan defeated the Bolshevik empire "He did it without firing a shot, as we know, but he had a super weapon -- oil.

-Michael Reagan

Without Moscow support, Iran would be neutered, which, in turn, pulls the rug out from under Hezbollah, Houthis, and Hamas. All roads lead to Moscow empire decolonization ...




Context :
In four months, Saudi extraction rose from two million to 10 million barrels a day, and prices plummeted from $32 a barrel to $10. For the USSR’s economy - already accustomed to exorbitant incomes from its oil, this was a death blow. in 1986 alone, the USSR lost more than $20 billion (approximately 7.5% of the USSR’s annual income), and it already had a budget deficit.

But Saudi Arabia’s economy was also punished because of the low prices! Why did they do it? Allen’s opinion is that Casey offered the sheiks financial reparations in exchange for the move; this opinion is backed up by the fact that in 1986, 80% of Saudi oil was sold through Exxon, Mobil, Texaco, and Chevron – all American companies.

The Bolshevik empire plunged into recession following the 1985-1986 oil crisis. It was enough for the already unhealthy, command-style Soviet economy to crumble. In 1986, USSR’s external loans were about $30 billion; by 1989 they had reached $50 billion.

Saudi Arabian oil prices gradually recovered until the early 2000s when they finally reached profitability again, but the Saudi government didn’t seem to care much, as they likely had massive sovereign funds saved from the hyper profitable 1970s. The US predictably profited: in 1986, American gas stations even gave away free petrol for advertising.

The oil crisis significantly helped the US win the Cold War against the USSR: the economic recession led Mikhail Gorbachev to make hugely unpopular political decisions. An attempt to reform the governmental system (known as Perestroika) was largely hopeless due to the lack of funds. Gorbachev’s populist rhetoric didn’t play well with an impoverished population. They demanded responsibility for the government’s short-sighted actions, and that’s when Boris Yeltsin came in with his harsh critique of the Soviet system at large. By the end of the 1980s, the collapse of the Bolshevik empire was all but inevitable.

 

[Blisterfinger]

wrong again

the reality :

View attachment 1114228



I know that many of our members dont understand TRUMP-Reagan strategical game against MOSCOW empire . BRENT OIL TODAY - 62 $ (Urals is much cheaper ) and “Saudi Arabia is ready to reduce oil prices to $50. AS I wrote before , With cost of “black gold” at 15-23 dollars per barrel, the USSR imperial economy collapsed, and the USSR empire itself collapsed, and the "golden" horde (Moscow empire) budget can only be fulfilled only with oil price at $ 42.4 and higher
Donald Trump wants to cut global oil prices in half (it's less than $30 US for Urals). If he does so, Moscow's empire won't survive his four years in office.
and this is the Trump´s peace plan

"I suggest that President TRUMP might want to study how Ronald Reagan defeated the Bolshevik empire "He did it without firing a shot, as we know, but he had a super weapon -- oil.

-Michael Reagan

Without Moscow support, Iran would be neutered, which, in turn, pulls the rug out from under Hezbollah, Houthis, and Hamas. All roads lead to Moscow empire decolonization ...




Context :
In four months, Saudi extraction rose from two million to 10 million barrels a day, and prices plummeted from $32 a barrel to $10. For the USSR’s economy - already accustomed to exorbitant incomes from its oil, this was a death blow. in 1986 alone, the USSR lost more than $20 billion (approximately 7.5% of the USSR’s annual income), and it already had a budget deficit.

But Saudi Arabia’s economy was also punished because of the low prices! Why did they do it? Allen’s opinion is that Casey offered the sheiks financial reparations in exchange for the move; this opinion is backed up by the fact that in 1986, 80% of Saudi oil was sold through Exxon, Mobil, Texaco, and Chevron – all American companies.

The Bolshevik empire plunged into recession following the 1985-1986 oil crisis. It was enough for the already unhealthy, command-style Soviet economy to crumble. In 1986, USSR’s external loans were about $30 billion; by 1989 they had reached $50 billion.

Saudi Arabian oil prices gradually recovered until the early 2000s when they finally reached profitability again, but the Saudi government didn’t seem to care much, as they likely had massive sovereign funds saved from the hyper profitable 1970s. The US predictably profited: in 1986, American gas stations even gave away free petrol for advertising.

The oil crisis significantly helped the US win the Cold War against the USSR: the economic recession led Mikhail Gorbachev to make hugely unpopular political decisions. An attempt to reform the governmental system (known as Perestroika) was largely hopeless due to the lack of funds. Gorbachev’s populist rhetoric didn’t play well with an impoverished population. They demanded responsibility for the government’s short-sighted actions, and that’s when Boris Yeltsin came in with his harsh critique of the Soviet system at large. By the end of the 1980s, the collapse of the Bolshevik empire was all but inevitable.

Maybe Russia should give peace a chance

 

[Litwin]

Maybe Russia should give peace a chance

The war in Ukraine is not just a struggle between Ukr. and Moscow empire . What we’re witnessing is the revival of an older, darker tradition: the Mongol -imperial war of domination, born on the steppes and in the non-stop jihads of empire.
Chinese academic Deng Xize identifies this pattern clearly, calling it the "Mongol-Muscovy and Jihadi" model—an empire built not on law or governance, but on violence, expansion, and divine justification. These empires don’t just conquer—they must keep conquering to survive.
The Moscow Empire is a direct descendant of this legacy. As the historical study on gw2ru.com explains, it was not a natural state but a byproduct of Mongol invasion and occupation. Its institutions, its violence, its obsession with expansion—these were not European or Slavic traditions, but Mongol ones. The Tsars simply replaced khans, inherited their tribute systems, and continued their imperial logic.
The same goes for the jihadi empires of old—Caliphates that also used religious and civilizational war to justify permanent conquest. What links these systems together is their rejection of peace as an endpoint. Peace is dangerous to them—because peace means borders. Borders mean legitimacy for others. And that cannot be tolerated in an imperial mindset.

Today’s Moscow Empire operates exactly as it did centuries ago:

War is normal—not a crisis, but a system of rule.
Legitimacy comes from conquest, not consent.
Expansion is existential—the empire cannot survive without it.

This is why Ukraine is being invaded. Not because of NATO, not because of globalist plots—but because the Mongol-Muscovy empire can only live if others die. This is not new. It’s very old.

And the world is finally beginning to reject it.

https://www.gw2ru.com/history/76029-mon ... sia-formed
https://www.thinkchina.sg/politics/no-m ... ar-ukraine

 

[Litwin]

Putin's economy is on the verge of collapse.

+1, where is Moscow empire today ? is it 1916 or 1917 already ?

 

[Litwin]

 

[Rigby5]

Maybe Russia should give peace a chance

Wrong.
The blame goes to Kyiv for deliberate treaty violations, such as murdering over 30k ethnic Russian natives, trying to block Russian use of Sevastopol, trying to put NATO nukes on Russia's border, cutting off all communications with Moscow, etc.

 

[Rigby5]

The Ukraine is in violation of treaties, so then what point would there be to a "cease fire"?
What has to happen instead, is a new government in Kyiv that won't violate treaties again in the future.

 

[Rigby5]

+1, where is Moscow empire today ? is it 1916 or 1917 already ?

That is stupid because only a capitalist economy can ever "collapse".
A communist or socialist economy can survive any and all events as long as starvation can be prevented.

 

[jc456]

"USA cannot win a conventional war against the Moscow empire."
Carlson is a loser which makes him think he is an expert on losers.
still, How many of our MAGA members agree with Tucker Carlson?

ps can you send it to him?
Moscow horde´s war record :-

1856 defeated by Britain and France

1905 defeated by Japan

1917 defeated by Germany

1920 defeated by Poland, Finland, Estonia and all Baltic states

1939 defeated by Finland

1969 defeated by China

1989 defeated by Afghanistan

1989 defeated in the Cold War.

1996 defeated by Chechnya

2022 defeated by Ukraine

2024 defeated in Syria

WW2 won USA/Britain , meanwhile Stalin's officers were shot or sent to the Gulags. Millions went to the Gulags, including Solzhenitsyn

Moscow's only victories come from invading smaller countries :-

a) Hungary 1956

b) Czechoslovakia 1968

c) Moldova 1992

d) Georgia 2008

can moscow win one against us?

 

[Rigby5]

The war in Ukraine is not just a struggle between Ukr. and Moscow empire . What we’re witnessing is the revival of an older, darker tradition: the Mongol -imperial war of domination, born on the steppes and in the non-stop jihads of empire.
Chinese academic Deng Xize identifies this pattern clearly, calling it the "Mongol-Muscovy and Jihadi" model—an empire built not on law or governance, but on violence, expansion, and divine justification. These empires don’t just conquer—they must keep conquering to survive.
The Moscow Empire is a direct descendant of this legacy. As the historical study on gw2ru.com explains, it was not a natural state but a byproduct of Mongol invasion and occupation. Its institutions, its violence, its obsession with expansion—these were not European or Slavic traditions, but Mongol ones. The Tsars simply replaced khans, inherited their tribute systems, and continued their imperial logic.
The same goes for the jihadi empires of old—Caliphates that also used religious and civilizational war to justify permanent conquest. What links these systems together is their rejection of peace as an endpoint. Peace is dangerous to them—because peace means borders. Borders mean legitimacy for others. And that cannot be tolerated in an imperial mindset.

Today’s Moscow Empire operates exactly as it did centuries ago:

War is normal—not a crisis, but a system of rule.
Legitimacy comes from conquest, not consent.
Expansion is existential—the empire cannot survive without it.

This is why Ukraine is being invaded. Not because of NATO, not because of globalist plots—but because the Mongol-Muscovy empire can only live if others die. This is not new. It’s very old.

And the world is finally beginning to reject it.

https://www.gw2ru.com/history/76029-mon ... sia-formed
https://www.thinkchina.sg/politics/no-m ... ar-ukraine
View attachment 1114286

Wrong.
It is Kyiv who deliberately started this war with treaty violations, like by trying to prevent Russian use of Sevastopol, massacring over 30k ethnic Russian natives of the Ukraine, trying to put NATO nukes on Russia's border, cutting off all communications with Moscow, etc.

 

[Rigby5]

can moscow win one against us?

Yes, Russia can easily beat us.
That is because we are capitalist, so greatly in debt, and dependent upon a high state of luxuries for the wealthy elite.
Any slight change in that causes total collapse.
And a very large change is easily done with just 3 EMPs over the US to disable all computers, TVs, cellphones, vehicles, utilities, etc.

 

[Rigby5]

Is the Trump Administration trying to beat the Moscow Empire?

The US can't ever beat Russia because we are totally profit motivated, and fighting Russia would bankrupt the US and end capitalism.
In fact, we are so close to bankruptcy right now, I doubt we could beat anyone.
We could not even beat the Vietnamese back in 1985, when we were much less in debt.

 

[Litwin]

Wrong.
It is Kyiv who deliberately started this war with treaty violations, like by trying to prevent Russian use of Sevastopol, massacring over 30k ethnic Russian natives of the Ukraine, trying to put NATO nukes on Russia's border, cutting off all communications with Moscow, etc.

DO you remember them ?

 

[Litwin]

can moscow win one against us?

ask Rigby5 , My answer is only if you give them victory for free.

 

[Rigby5]

"USA cannot win a conventional war against the Moscow empire."
Carlson is a loser which makes him think he is an expert on losers.
still, How many of our MAGA members agree with Tucker Carlson?

ps can you send it to him?
Moscow horde´s war record :-

1856 defeated by Britain and France

1905 defeated by Japan

1917 defeated by Germany

1920 defeated by Poland, Finland, Estonia and all Baltic states

1939 defeated by Finland

1969 defeated by China

1989 defeated by Afghanistan

1989 defeated in the Cold War.

1996 defeated by Chechnya

2022 defeated by Ukraine

2024 defeated in Syria

WW2 won USA/Britain , meanwhile Stalin's officers were shot or sent to the Gulags. Millions went to the Gulags, including Solzhenitsyn

Moscow's only victories come from invading smaller countries :-

a) Hungary 1956

b) Czechoslovakia 1968

c) Moldova 1992

d) Georgia 2008

Totally wrong and mindless propaganda.
Those events listed as "Russian defeats" were not at all defeats of Russia.
Not a single one of them involved someone defeating Russia by invading and taking over.
Sometimes Russia was prevented from invading someone else, but that is not "defeating" Russia when Russia just decides something is not worth it.

And obviously it was Russia who won both WWI and WWII, not the other Allies.

 

[Rigby5]

DO you remember them ?
View attachment 1114299

Why do you post all this mindless spam?
What do the Rosenbergs have to do with anything?
They successfully scammed Russia, and Nixon lied about them to murder them and get his own political campaign started.
The Rosenbergs never gave Russia anything remotely of value.

 

[Rigby5]

ask Rigby5 , My answer is only if you give them victory for free.

View attachment 1114302

Nonsense.
Since Russia is not capitalist, the volume of income is irrelevant to them.
The majority of the income in the US cannot be used in a war because it is private.

 

[Rigby5]

Putin's economy is on the verge of collapse.

Rather than negotiating, we should bitch slap him and provide more aid to Ukraine until Putin drops to his knees and begs for mercy.

Wrong.
Since Putin is in the right and Kyiv is the criminal treaty violator, Russia is bound to win.
Our choice is whether or not we want to push Russia to the point they are forced to use their superior nuclear arsenal to totally destroy the US?

 

[rightwinger]

Tucker is a Russian stooge. He made that plain a long time ago.

The US could defeat Russia without even working up a sweat.

Russia has proved itself to be a second rate military power.

The US is the strongest military in the history of mankind