bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,368
- 2,180
You already made it clear that you're to stupid to get the point.That...doesn't make sense.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You already made it clear that you're to stupid to get the point.That...doesn't make sense.
List the relevant ones.The relevant laws are cited in the indictment, loser. Can’t you fucking read?
Listen you authoritarian moron, Trump is not synonymous with "the government". That's true in authoritarian states, but it's not true in this country.They failed their duties and allowed a local insurrection to continue. The normal people in the area didn't sign off on that.
Yes, you can, if the government fails in it's duties.
considering Trump at the time was "the government" there was nothing for them to take control of.
It's about control, and CHAZ/CHOP took it. Jan 6th did nothing but delay a vote by a few hours.
Listen you authoritarian moron, Trump is not synonymous with "the government". That's true in authoritarian states, but it's not true in this country.
Congress is just as much part of government as Trump and we both know that the attack on January 6th was against Congress who was in the process of replacing Trump according to the constitution. That's an attempt to change the governance of the ENTIRE country.
What people "talk about" is far less relevant than what is factually true.When people talk about "the government" they talk about the executive branch. At the time Trump was "the government" as the head of the executive branch.
Congress has no actual executive powers, it's the legislative branch that give the executive branch the authority to be 'the government" via passed laws.
What people "talk about" is far less relevant than what is factually true.
Congress is every bit a part of "the government" and they do more than just pass laws. Obviously.
You can try to keep to this pathetic argument, but it's just embarassing.
We should be proud about cops shooting unarmed people of color?She looks confused lol. Looks like she has no clue what’s going on.
But you know what I support equality among men just like you do. Knowing that there’s millions of white and Black people living in poverty ….some starving to death we shouldn’t have groups called BLM or WLM…. It’s about uplifting every American. And I have to disagree with you people who support group BLM inherently are supporting racial division, making people feel uncomfortable instead of making people feel proud ….every American truly should feel proud of their background they should feel proud of their ancestors and it’s vital …otherwise we’re not gonna have a civilized society.
BLM leaders are making millions of dollars ripping off their working class supporters. It’s not right and I’ll call out any Republican any Democrat any white or black person who rips people off. It says right on the BLM website that they “invested in real estate” I mean it is utterly extraordinary they are telling supporters right on their website of their fraud. I think they have since taken it down but they were affectively attempting to explain their fraud by saying they invest donor money in multi million dollar mansions. I mean come on it’s ridiculous that money should go toward poor communities.
Here’s the thing I know what I see with my eyes we all do. How can a civil rights group justify purchasing multi million dollar mansions with Donor money? So that is an issue. And there are so many working class Black people who are fed up with BLM. And any black person that openly supports BLM and believes white people are privileged they are a disgrace to the great history of Africa. It’s no different then being a white person and believing that blacks are born with a silver spoon in there mouth and they have everything handed to him.
What made you come to that conclusion.?We should be proud about cops shooting unarmed people of color?
That's ridiculous, you're asking doe it makes us safer by convicting traitors to our country.Does convicting Oath Keepers really make our country safer?
What a fricken hoot no racist in this country. This from a wacko that aligns himself with a racist hate group, The Republican Party,. Bigoted ,Homophobic, xenophobic ,chauvinist hate group. Who the patriots of America have found to be this countries biggest threat and enemy. All American patriots hate this group.What made you come to that conclusion.?
If you support equality between man we are on the same side.
Here’s the problem in America there’s practically no racists in the country black or white. What the far left does when somebody says they don’t agree with BLM ….. is to claim racism…. That’s against democracy
You are absolutely full of fucking horseshit, if you believe there are no racists in the country!What made you come to that conclusion.?
If you support equality between man we are on the same side.
Here’s the problem in America there’s practically no racists in the country black or white. What the far left does when somebody says they don’t agree with BLM ….. is to claim racism…. That’s against democracy
Well, the constant promotion by the powers that be of cops shooting unarmed people of color. There are cop screw ups as to be sure. The inner cities are just too expensive. It's time to pull back in government outlays of all types.We should be proud about cops shooting unarmed people of color?
WTF are you talking about?Well, the constant promotion by the powers that be of cops shooting unarmed people of color. There are cop screw ups as to be sure. The inner cities are just too expensive. It's time to pull back in government outlays of all types.
What made you come to that conclusion.?
If you support equality between man we are on the same side.
Here’s the problem in America there’s practically no racists in the country black or white. What the far left does when somebody says they don’t agree with BLM ….. is to claim racism…. That’s against democracy
If the government “let them do it” then you’re going to have a hard time proving that they took control from the government.
See what I mean about facts?
Next time spell it correctly. Its "too"You already made it clear that you're to stupid to get the point.
Next time spell it correctly. Its "too"
Did they take control or did the government let them have control?
These aren’t semantics, this is crucial to proving the case. Taking has a far different meaning than being let.
is that a Federal or state issue?Does the government have the legal right to let a bunch of thugs take control of a portion of a city? They were out of line, as well as breaking the law by letting it continue themselves.
is that a Federal or state issue?