Zone1 How long has man been walking the earth?



What say you?

Here is evidence that mankind has been walking the earth for hundreds of million years ago.

I think the standard accepted timelines about ancient history are complete garbage. I suspect we'll find out much more in the future and laugh about how wrong our understanding of, say, ancient Egypt and the pyramids was.
 


What say you?

Here is evidence that mankind has been walking the earth for hundreds of million years ago.

The 1844 nail in sandstone refers to a reported discovery by Sir David Brewster in Scotland, where a nail was found embedded in a sandstone block, sparking interest as a potential "out-of-place artifact," though it was later found lying on the surface beneath glacial deposits, making it a geological curiosity rather than evidence of ancient advanced civilizations, as it was simply trapped in hardened clay over the rock, not truly "inside" it.
 
Homo sapiens have been around for about 300,000 years.

The smelting of iron began about 2000 BC in what is modern day Turkey.
 
Not this conservative and many others like me.

Try again

Do you call into question the sanity/intelligence of the conservatives who really feel that the earth is thousands of years old/believe in some bearded guy on a cloud calling the shots?

Of course you don't.

So you're very much complicit.

Try again.
 
Do you call into question the sanity/intelligence of the conservatives who really feel that the earth is thousands of years old/believe in some bearded guy on a cloud calling the shots?

Of course you don't.

So you're very much complicit.

Try again.
The Bible does not say that the earth is 6000 years old.

In fact, it says just the opposite

Genesis 2:4 These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens.

So, if it was 6 literal days, what is all this about generations again?

Try again.
 
or it could be their dating methods are flawed..
The age of the universe has been measured using a variety of independent technological systems, including radio-acgtive dating, Doppler shifts in starlight, and the isotropic "3 degree above zero" radiation background. The methods of these studies are totally unrelated. Therefore, an error that might have occurred in one of them would not appear in others, yet the data from all three point to a very old universe.
 
Do you call into question the sanity/intelligence of the conservatives who really feel that the earth is thousands of years old/believe in some bearded guy on a cloud calling the shots?

Of course you don't.

So you're very much complicit.

Try again.
not as crazy as believing men can get pregnant or that the child in the womb isn't human life ..
 
Do you call into question the sanity/intelligence of the conservatives who really feel that the earth is thousands of years old/believe in some bearded guy on a cloud calling the shots?

Of course you don't.

So you're very much complicit.

Try again.
:cuckoo:

You’re a nasty loon.
 
What say you?

Australopithecus goes back about 5 million years and that was pre-Homo. That is a modern common nail. Someone bore a hole is some stone and used a nail on it.

The age of the rock is immaterial to the time it was used.
 
the sanity/intelligence of the conservatives who really feel that the earth is thousands of years old/believe in some bearded guy on a cloud calling the shots?

Better be careful, cornhole, if god hears you, you might not get any Christmas presents next sparkle-season. :asshole:
 
15th post
The age of the universe has been measured using a variety of independent technological systems, including radio-acgtive dating, Doppler shifts in starlight, and the isotropic "3 degree above zero" radiation background. The methods of these studies are totally unrelated. Therefore, an error that might have occurred in one of them would not appear in others, yet the data from all three point to a very old universe.
You sure about that??

Galileo got hisself locked up for heresy for daring to go against consensus.

Proteins have been found in dinosaur fossils, which only have a half-life of approx. 500 years. How can that be?? Of course believers in the big bang have proffered an explanation that contorts an obvious scientific fact to fit their narrative of millions of years, because afterall, the millions of years narrative is foundational to their belief system. That is not science, that is very, very smart people chasing a dream.

The James Webb Telescope has produced findings which contradict the big bang and millions of years, and of course the very smart people just shift gears and carry on.

Here is an excellent talk about the James Webb Telescope findings by Astrophysicist Dr. Jason Lisle.

Watch it, I'm sure you'll find it interesting.

 
Galileo got hisself locked up for heresy for daring to go against consensus.
There was no consensus beyond the opinions of a few Catholic clerics based on a few words in the Bible referring to the Sun traveling across the sky. They reasoned that this was the Bible's way of saying the Sun traveled around the Earth therefore the Earth had to be the center of the universe. And if you disagreed, they simply burned you at the stake.

Proteins have been found in dinosaur fossils, which only have a half-life of approx. 500 years. How can that be??
Please do not try to claim that we had dinosaurs roaming the Earth in the 16th century back when Columbus was sailing the sea and DaVinci and Michelangelo were painting! :lmao:


The James Webb Telescope has produced findings which contradict the big bang and millions of years,
Bullshit. Name the specific evidence.

Here is an excellent talk about the James Webb Telescope findings by Astrophysicist Dr. Jason Lisle.
Never heard of the guy and I almost went into astrophysics as a career. The guy is a creationist. Heads up: The JWMT has not disproven the universe being 13.7 billion years old.

PS: No one expected to find fewer galaxies out farther way, everyone expect to find MORE.
 
Back
Top Bottom