Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,447
- 2,290
It would have been the same under Trump…this is worldwide, something the president doesn’t have much control over, just like the worldwide crash from covid.
It's like I've said so often here: the best part about being a Democrat is never having to say it was your fault.
A year ago Dementia signed a bill paying people more to stay home than work. That lasted until September of last year. In this attempt to buy votes and make people more dependent on government, we produced less because it would be stupid to go back to work for less money, so people stayed home.
When people stay home, it creates a labor shortage. When less gets produced, you create a supply chain problem. At the same time since businesses had to compete with government for workers, they had to make more attractive offers. These costs gets transferred to the services and products we use thus inflation.
Trump refused to sign that bill for that reason. He knew the vaccines would be the key to places opening back up and people getting back to work. So no, under Trump it would not be the same. Trump would have continued to not only have the US being the worlds largest exporter of energy, but keep our status as energy independent thus lower priced gasoline and heating fuel.