David Jeffrey Spetch
Senior Member
- Nov 17, 2014
- 975
- 46
- 53
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #81
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ever notice how the phobes make up their own history and completely ignore the facts?
![]()
and notice that this homosexual activist evades what was in the very composition beginning this very thread. Look for what is in bold from the following quote that this homosexual activists attempts deliberate ignorance upon while trying to keep forcing their already exposed lies and deceptions down everyone's throat.
"Homosexual activists have managed to temporarily make a complete mockery of marriage on some parts of the globe and they did this by ignoring and avoiding the very foundation of what marriage is about. Instead they scrambled to make marriage about anything else other than what marriage has always been about. For hundreds or even thousands of years since marriage was created, only heterosexual unions were ever honored with marriage thus is the very non contestable factual evidence proving that marriage is exclusively about honoring the union of the one sexual orientation to which we all owe our very existence which is quite obviously heterosexual unions. Even different variations of the human race getting married was also always in honor of the unity of male and female. They even deceptively tried to make marriage to be about being with who you love. They again ignored the fact that love may have been present in many marriages but marriage itself was always between heterosexual unions of which beside that primary fact to do with this issue, not every heterosexual couple got married out of love.They also tried to make the issue about heterosexual couples who are not able to birth children and can still get married. That was when they were trying to make the issue of marriage into "marriage isn't about procreation." What they avoided, I find quite obvious, is the fact that heterosexual couples that can not have children still doesn't disrespect that marriage was created for and in honor of heterosexual unions. Marriage wouldn't even exist now if it were not for heterosexual unions. None of us would even exist now if it were not for heterosexual unions which quite obviously makes heterosexual unions, well above all other unions, worth honoring..if it were up to homosexuality to sustain the human population, we quite obviously would have died off thousands of years ago for weakly being a race of sexually defective and where is the honor in that?"
But thanks for sharing yet another example of the ignorant mentality of the homosexual activist. I guess that perhaps their mentality is just to oblivious to realize their own transparency which certainly makes it easier for me to expose them for the liars and deceivers that they prove to be on the foundation of their every issue to do with their bias agenda.
love
David Jeffrey Spetch
Ps. Be good, e strong!