Keep your hopes high and sing along with this song.
Maybe you'll get that Trump some day.
No pie in the sky for me. I want it now.
How has trying Trump in the court of public opinion and or in NY courts worked out for Dems so far?
- Thread starter BrokeLoser
- Start date
No pie in the sky for me. I want it now.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 52,627
- 38,653
- 3,545
Keep telling yourself that.
Ghey!
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Yes you voted for a convicted felon
Nixon was pardon after he was convicted based on the watergate incident.
Supreme Court’s Trump ruling would have given Nixon immunity | Miller Center
The Supreme Court's ruling is a radical revision of the Constitutionmillercenter.org
It seems the optic of having a president behind bars is something the court system does not want to set a presedence for
They the courts are happy if he resigns.
View attachment 1142691
Nixon wasn't convicted.
Not just myself, the board everyday.
Which set the historical precedent for the pardons Biden issued.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 52,627
- 38,653
- 3,545
No one really listens to you.
But you can’t help responding.
Marchimedes
Platinum Member
Probably? You are so sure about this that you said "probably." By all means we are waiting for the rest of this thesis.
Good thing you said "probably."
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
LOL!
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 53,995
- 25,135
- 2,488
- Banned
- #31
You silly person. You are probably ghey.
Kilroy2
Gold Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 8,339
- 3,018
- 210
The issue is presidential immunity from criminal activity
Nixon set the bar
Trump made it a necessity
millercenter.org
Former presidents did not enjoy broad immunity from criminal prosecution until July 1, 2024, when six members of the Supreme Court created that privilege in Trump v. United States.
Article II, Section 4 established that former presidents had criminal liability, not criminal immunity.
That what you get when right wing judges have to protect republican president name Trump who cannot control himself because he is rich and the president.
I guess all men are not created equally
Article II, Section 4 established that former presidents had criminal liability, not criminal immunity. Even after impeachment, conviction and removal, “the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.”
Ford raised doubts about whether America would be able to give Nixon a fair trial until months, perhaps years, elapsed. That was his justification for pardoning Nixon.
Ted Kennedy was the only senator who was a vocal credit of the pardon
In light of the Trump experience, some historians looked back and saw the Nixon pardon in a new light: as a damaging precedent establishing presidential impunity.
Trump took it the next level and the courts bailed him out. Welll probably the republican selected judges.
Thus all this forgiveness by courts shows that some *Presidents" are above the law because it looks bad for them to go to jail.
Thus the concept of no man is above the law is lip service
millercenter.org
Nixon set the bar
Trump made it a necessity
Supreme Court’s Trump ruling would have given Nixon immunity | Miller Center
The Supreme Court's ruling is a radical revision of the Constitution
Former presidents did not enjoy broad immunity from criminal prosecution until July 1, 2024, when six members of the Supreme Court created that privilege in Trump v. United States.
Article II, Section 4 established that former presidents had criminal liability, not criminal immunity.
That what you get when right wing judges have to protect republican president name Trump who cannot control himself because he is rich and the president.
I guess all men are not created equally
Article II, Section 4 established that former presidents had criminal liability, not criminal immunity. Even after impeachment, conviction and removal, “the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.”
Ford raised doubts about whether America would be able to give Nixon a fair trial until months, perhaps years, elapsed. That was his justification for pardoning Nixon.
Ted Kennedy was the only senator who was a vocal credit of the pardon
In light of the Trump experience, some historians looked back and saw the Nixon pardon in a new light: as a damaging precedent establishing presidential impunity.
Trump took it the next level and the courts bailed him out. Welll probably the republican selected judges.
Thus all this forgiveness by courts shows that some *Presidents" are above the law because it looks bad for them to go to jail.
Thus the concept of no man is above the law is lip service
Supreme Court’s Trump ruling would have given Nixon immunity | Miller Center
The Supreme Court's ruling is a radical revision of the Constitution
Last edited:
Mack The Finger
Diamond Member
Is that you behind that avatar ?
Mack The Finger
Diamond Member
The only thing Nixon was guilty of was lying about when he found out about the break in
It was not done with his blessing.
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
- Apr 29, 2017
- 99,268
- 105,331
- 3,615
Offhand, I'd say about as well as shoving a burning cactus up your own ass.
Which is what makes their continued public displays of arrogant defiance so entertaining.
At the rate democrats are going, by the time Trump's term is finished, they won't have any party left. So how do they respond? By turning even /FARTHER/ Left and stomping the gas pedal to the floor going into Whole Hog Marxism.
What could possibly go wrong?
Mack The Finger
Diamond Member
Is that you behind that avatar !
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Now show the same bar graph for the 1st quarter!
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
I suspect not one American in 500 knows about the Massacre of 1622.- Started by excalibur
- Replies: 3
