You've presented no argument as always.
How Ginny Thomas Proves Judge Jackson Can't Be Trusted On The Supreme Court
- Thread starter Biff_Poindexter
- Start date
rightnow909
Diamond Member
- Oct 5, 2021
- 4,789
- 2,713
- 1,908
I've read most of this... haven't found anythingI guess it should not be a surprise that an examination of Ginny Thomas's texts between herself and Trump's Chief of Staff reveals she is a Q-tard. Mark Meadows did nothing to dissuade her from her whackjob beliefs. In fact, he kept blessing her.
When Meadows wrote to Thomas on Nov. 24, the White House chief of staff invoked God to describe the effort to overturn the election. “This is a fight of good versus evil,” Meadows wrote. “Evil always looks like the victor until the King of Kings triumphs. Do not grow weary in well doing. The fight continues. I have staked my career on it. Well at least my time in DC on it.”
Thomas replied: “Thank you!! Needed that! This plus a conversation with my best friend just now… I will try to keep holding on. America is worth it!”
[snip]
Ginni Thomas, in that interview, also acknowledged that she had attended Trump’s “Stop the Steal” rally at the Ellipse near the White House on Jan. 6, but said that she left early because it was too cold and that she did not have any role in planning the event.
[snip]
In February 2021, when the Supreme Court rejected election challenges filed by Trump and his allies, Thomas wrote in a dissent that it was “baffling” and “inexplicable” that the majority had decided against hearing the cases because he believed the Supreme Court should provide states with guidance for future elections.
Ginny goes full batshit:
“The intense pressures you and our President are now experiencing are more intense than Anything Experienced (but I only felt a fraction of it in 1991),” Thomas wrote to Meadows on Nov. 19, an apparent reference to Justice Thomas’s 1991 confirmation hearings in which lawyer Anita Hill testified that he had made unwanted sexual comments when he was her boss. Thomas strongly denied the accusations.
The first of the 29 messages between Ginni Thomas and Meadows was sent on Nov. 5, two days after the election. She sent him a link to a YouTube video labeled “TRUMP STING w CIA Director Steve Pieczenik, The Biggest Election Story in History, QFS-BLOCKCHAIN.”
Pieczenik, a former State Department official, is a far-right commentator who has falsely claimed that the 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., was a “false-flag” operation to push a gun-control agenda.
The video Thomas shared with Meadows is no longer available on YouTube. But Thomas wrote to Meadows, “I hope this is true; never heard anything like this before, or even a hint of it. Possible???”
“Watermarked ballots in over 12 states have been part of a huge Trump & military white hat sting operation in 12 key battleground states,” she wrote.
During that period, supporters of the QAnon extremist ideology embraced a false theory that Trump had watermarked mail-in ballots so he could track potential fraud. “Watch the water” was a refrain in QAnon circles at the time.
In the Nov. 5 message to Meadows, Thomas went on to quote a passage that had circulated on right-wing websites: “Biden crime family & ballot fraud co-conspirators (elected officials, bureaucrats, social media censorship mongers, fake stream media reporters, etc) are being arrested & detained for ballot fraud right now & over coming days, & will be living in barges off GITMO to face military tribunals for sedition.”
batsh*** yet
except in the person claiming it is there
+
That's not a simple question. It's a political gotcha question. She's not that stupid, but Blackburn is for asking it.
The big lie is batshit crazy. Period!
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,301
- 99,392
- 3,645
Of course you haven't, Qildo.
Mac1958
Diamond Member
Qanon has made it to the US Supreme Court.
Pretty fuckin' amazing.
Pretty fuckin' amazing.
Population control allows for propagation fool.
On planet Fruit Loop perhaps.
rightnow909
Diamond Member
- Oct 5, 2021
- 4,789
- 2,713
- 1,908
meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 23,809
- 20,921
- 2,290
How does the handling of the ballots, change whether or not they were legally cast. You're saying their status can be retroactively changed, based on occurrences after the ballot was cast, signed and sealed. By the actions of actors outside of the voters control.
This is no different than a requirement that mail-in votes have a legible postmark. And an unscrupulous election worker with a sharpie goes around defacing the postmarks on stacks of ballots.
Does that make them invalid?
H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
Nobody has said she is not allowed to be bat shit crazy.
Ha everybody, I'm at stop the steal rally to support the Jan. 6th big lie with my QANON buddies, who will attack the Capitol, and guess what? My husband is a wind up doll on the supreme court. Ya!!!!!!!
IamZ
Platinum Member
- Mar 11, 2022
- 1,964
- 1,188
- 893
Except the Dems proved it was a big lie. Nothing crazy about that chief.
Critical thinking is not for you. Move along now.
A supreme court justice disguised as a black man.Ginny Thomas? Who dat?
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
Biden’s Late Cancer Diagnosis Exposes Democrats And The Media As Legitimate National Security Risks- Started by Doc7505
- Replies: 8
-
Noem confuses a constitutional right with its abuse. Imagine my surprise.- Started by berg80
- Replies: 21
