How England won very own Vietnam War against Marxist supported by Moscow terrorists

Why on the Earth should they represent Britain? They represent a part of American society and elite.
If they represent some kind of American society, then only the descendants of the colonists and British migrants. The bulk of their electorate is swindled fools.
 
the Enlightenment

A great admirer of the Enlightenment, Catherine 2 introduced total slavery in Russia, made parasites out of the aristocracy, fucked with soldiers and horses. Was it the fruits of enlightenmen?
 
If they represent some kind of American society, then only the descendants of the colonists and British migrants. The bulk of their electorate is swindled fools.
Their electoral base is all over the US. And who now bothers there who is a descendant of British migrants? More than 200 years have passed since then.
 
A great admirer of the Enlightenment, Catherine 2 introduced total slavery in Russia, made parasites out of the aristocracy, fucked with soldiers and horses. Was it the fruits of enlightenmen?
I was talking about the West society. Except of that, even now that society still stays on the early stages. Should I repeat it once more?
 
Their electoral base is all over the US. And who now bothers there who is a descendant of British migrants? More than 200 years have passed since then.
All the rest who vote for them are just idiots who were swindled by left-wing scammers. Democracy is ochlocracy
 
I was talking about the West society. Except of that, even now that society still stays on the early stages. Should I repeat it once more?
You use the concept of "West", invented by PR managers, which does not exist in nature
 
ESay Indigenous Europeans, in principle, cannot claim any educational mission. They could not create their own civilization, they remained in savagery until the east across the Danube taught them to wipe their ass and wash their hands before eating. They had enough time - several thousand years. They failed
 
ESay Indigenous Europeans, in principle, cannot claim any educational mission. They could not create their own civilization, they remained in savagery until the east across the Danube taught them to wipe their ass and wash their hands before eating. They had enough time - several thousand years. They failed
That is the most hilarious part. Considering the science, technology, philosophy etc developed in the West.
 
She was a German by birth, but a Russian by mentality.
In general, the historical Russians are the Germans.
No, she was pure German. The mentality, for example, of a "Russian" woman from the Volga does not imply that you need to be a whore and zoophile.

But our conversation was about the Enlightenment, you went into the wilds. She was a fan of the Enlightenment.
 
That is the most hilarious part. Considering the science, technology, philosophy etc developed in the West.
It is a fact. Before the arrival of the Celts from Asia, there were savages in Europe, and they were civilized only in the era of Rome. And not all. Some remained wild until the 7th century, before the arrival of the Avars. In the 7th-8th centuries AD, they lived in the Neolithic.
This all applies mainly to the German-Balts, the north of Europe. The Danube has been developed since ancient times, but the Danube is not "West" it is part of the East in terms of culture.
 
Last edited:
1) Britts are...
Ivan you are drunk, be careful with Bayarka ....





1643482697777.png
 
It is a fact. Before the arrival of the Celts from Asia, there were savages in Europe, and they were civilized only in the era of Rome. And not all. Some remained wild until the 7th century, before the arrival of the Avars. In the 7th-8th centuries AD, they lived in the Neolithic.
This all applies mainly to the German-Balts, the north of Europe. The Danube has been developed since ancient times, but the Danube is not "West" it is part of the East in terms of culture.
Dude, if you are going to ignore the Renaissance and Enlightenment ages, then there is nothing to discuss here.
 
Dude, if you are going to ignore the Renaissance and Enlightenment ages, then there is nothing to discuss here.
By chance, do not these eras coincide with the eras of bloody church totalitarianism and obscurantism?
 
Renaissance
Unfortunately you are wrong. The heyday of bloody obscurantism was precisely at this time. it is connected with the seizure of power by the Germans in the Roman Empire after the plague.

scale_1200
 
Witch hunt 15th-17th century

Renaissance - 15-17 centuries everywhere in Europe.

Renaissance = witch hunt.

regnum_picture_1518704257279259_normal.jpg
 
In addition, astronomers were burned there, the unwanted were tortured, there are icons of the dismemberment of babies, and so on
 
Unfortunately you are wrong. The heyday of bloody obscurantism was precisely at this time. it is connected with the seizure of power by the Germans in the Roman Empire after the plague.

scale_1200
It was mostly in the Middle Ages. Since Renaissance secularism began to gain support. The key word 'began'.
 

Forum List

Back
Top