How England won very own Vietnam War against Marxist supported by Moscow terrorists

[Litwin]

How England won very own Vietnam War against Marxist (Satanic) supported by Moscow terrorists​

related :

The Britons on Ukraine's frozen frontline, fighting Moscow oriental barbarism

The Britons on Ukraine's frozen frontline, fighting Moscow oriental barbarism God bless Ukraine ! BIG BIG RESPECT to all British 🇬🇧 troops out there , More brilliant military photography in the snow !! still Moscow is along and without chances to win this war

www.usmessageboard.com

BREAKING : UK/US 'lethal aid' arrives in Kyiv amid border build-up. BAD NEWS FOR MOSCOW AND ITS USEFUL IDIOTS LIKE Fox News Carlson

" Some 90 tonnes of US "lethal aid" has arrived in Ukraine, amid tensions over Russia's troop build-up on the border. It was the first shipment of a recently approved package of US military aid for Ukraine, and included ammunition for "front-line defenders". The delivery followed US Secretary of...

www.usmessageboard.com

Britain Sends New Weapons To Ukraine , supplying Ukraine with anti-tank weapons against oriental barbarians!

I think they don't want a piece of us. The "everyone" is Russia, just like I have told you guys for years and the piece they want is the entire country of Ukraine, at least for now. "Moscow predicts that the war with Ukraine will bring down their ruble by 20%" putin like ussr in 80s , just...

www.usmessageboard.com

in 2022 England is still fighting barbaric horde of oriental barbarians ! God Bless the England !

 

[rupol2000]

1) Britts are born Marxists. It is the center of world leftism.

2) The Britts never fight, they are merchants. They force others to fight for their own interests.

3) The British authorities have not yet been held accountable for the atrocities against the US people.

4) The British authorities have not yet been held accountable for the atrocities in India and the genocide of the Bengalis.

 

[rupol2000]

By the way, the Litvins are the historical enemies of the Poles-Ukrainians. Lithuania-Rus at one time fought with the Ukrainian-Poland and was eventually subordinated and included in the Grate Polnad.

 

[rupol2000]

Currently, the Litvins are trying to appropriate the Polish glory. They attribute to themselves the paraphernalia of the Polish hussars, sing their songs as their own, and so on.

 

[rupol2000]

They are trying to represent Rzeczpospolita as an "alliance". There was no union there. Lithuania was subordinated and integrated into Rzeczpospolita.

 

[rupol2000]

Marxists came to Russia from the territory of historical Lithuania. It included Belarus and the west of Muscovy. The very name Russians is the ethnonym of the Litvins.
Therefore, it is ridiculous to observe how Lithuanian propaganda is now portraying itself as anti-Marxists and Russophobes.
Native Russians hate themselves and their culture of bast shoes and nesting dolls lol

 

[ESay]

So, what is this about? Britain lost its global role long time ago. Hardly it can regain it at any point in the foreseeable future. Even their role as a regional power is under question because Franco-German EU is more attractive (at least in economic terms).

 

[rupol2000]

So, what is this about? Britain lost its global role long time ago. Hardly it can regain it at any point in the foreseeable future. Even their role as a regional power is under question because Franco-German EU is more attractive (at least in economic terms).

Not exactly. Britain controls the world through the left and through finance. It never completely lost the influence.

 

[ESay]

Not exactly. Britain controls the world through the left and through finance. It never completely lost the influence.

Yeah, I know this point exists and has supporters. Though, I consider it to be overstretched.

I can only assume what 'the left' means in your post. But if that is what I feel it is, then it is not about someone 'pushing' it. It is about a natural way of life. Evolution, if you want.

 

[rupol2000]

Yeah, I know this point exists and has supporters. Though, I consider it to be overstretched.

I can only assume what 'the left' means in your post. But if that is what I feel it is, then it is not about someone 'pushing' it. It is about a natural way of life. Evolution, if you want.

The word left means democrats and communists, supporters of totalitarianism.

There is no evolution in human society, there has always been and is selection. For example, slave owners deliberately raised slaves.

 

[rupol2000]

In Roosevelt's time, Britain had the real power in the US. Roosevelt carried out Churchill's orders, restricted American freedoms, and was friends with Stalin. Eisenhower overthrew Britain. But then Britain again infiltrated the power of the United States through the Kennedy clan. Reagan overthrew it again, then there were vacillations back and forth, during Obama, Britain again firmly took over America. Now in the US pro-British power, that's no doubt.

 

[ESay]

The word left means democrats and communists, supporters of totalitarianism.

There is no evolution in human society, there has always been and is selection. For example, slave owners deliberately raised slaves.

Evolution of human society. It becomes less 'brutal' and more 'civilized'. Now a master can't kill his serf without punishment, or a king can't execute a person simply by decreeing that. Grouos of people who were considered as 'under-humans' now have equal protection with the rest. Etc.

Democrats and communists aren't the same. Basically, communism is more about economic ideology. A person can advocate communism and has totalitarian views.

 

[rupol2000]

In particular, it is beneficial for the British elites to inflate the conflict in Ukraine in order to destroy the Russian, Ukrainian and American populations and destabilize their political system.

 

[ESay]

In Roosevelt's time, Britain had the real power in the US. Roosevelt carried out Churchill's orders, restricted American freedoms, and was friends with Stalin. Eisenhower overthrew Britain. But then Britain again infiltrated the power of the United States through the Kennedy clan. Reagan overthrew it again, then there were vacillations back and forth, during Obama, Britain again firmly took over America. Now in the US pro-British power, that's no doubt.

The main question is why would an American 'elite' who have vast financial and military resources bow down to the guys from London.

 

[rupol2000]

Now a master can't kill his serf without punishment, or a king can't execute a person simply by decreeing that

That is, we have evolved to the laws of Hammurappi?

In fact, in the leftist regimes of Europe and Moscow, villains operate with almost impunity. Firstly, some crimes are legalized, some thieves cannot be convicted, and secondly, thanks to humanistic principles, the villains are not punished, but "re-educated", and after they leave, they continue their villainy. The authorities of many countries destroy populations of people with impunity, engage in genocide. For example, the Chinese authorities are massacring the Uyghurs, and the British authorities killed several million Bengalis. The Pashtun authorities are massacring the Hazaras and so on.

Therefore, before Hammurappi, we have not yet evolved.

 

[rupol2000]

The main question is why would an American 'elite' who have vast financial and military resources bow down to the guys from London.

The elites are not homogeneous, there is a struggle going on. Democrats always represent Britain in the US, they are just not always in power.

 

[ESay]

That is, we have evolved to the laws of Hammurappi?

In fact, in the leftist regimes of Europe and Moscow, villains operate with almost impunity. Firstly, some crimes are legalized, some thieves cannot be convicted, and secondly, thanks to humanistic principles, the villains are not punished, but "re-educated", and after they leave, they continue their villainy. The authorities of many countries destroy populations of people with impunity, engage in genocide. For example, the Chinese authorities are massacring the Uyghurs, and the British authorities killed several million Bengalis. The Pashtun authorities are massacring the Hazaras and so on.

Therefore, before Hammurappi, we have not yet evolved.

Actually, I was talking about 'the West' society. And significant impulse of this evolution was given by the Enlightenment. And this society is only on early stages of it.

 

[ESay]

The elites are not homogeneous, there is a struggle going on. Democrats always represent Britain in the US, they are just not always in power.

Why on the Earth should they represent Britain? They represent a part of American society and elite.

 

[rupol2000]

Actually, I was talking about 'the West' society. And significant impulse of this evolution was given by the Enlightenment. And this society is only on early stages of it.

There is no "West". From the point of view of law, Europe and Moscow are subject to the slaveholding principles of Roman law, while in the United States there is no humanism towards villains and totalitarianism.
There is slavery in Europe. There, for example, a slave-type army.

 

[rupol2000]

And significant impulse of this evolution was given by the Enlightenment

Enlightenment is some kind of incomprehensible shit. no one understands what exactly is meant.

The era of romanticism was the liberation of Europe, the power of the Austro-Hungarian Habsburgs. But that's in the past, these freedoms are long gone