The employer is required to pay no less than the $7.25/Hr. Minimum rate.
Right.
Now answer my question. You said the minimum wage impacts every single worker.
How does it impact these $10/hr workers?
How would it be a disaster for these $10/hr workers if the minimum wage law was repealed?
Due to the economic concept of wage differentials, employers are motivated to pay more than the minimum rate.
Due to supply and demand, they're motivated to pay $10/hr. The minimum wage has zero effect. Right?
Toddsterpatriot, wrong; supply and demand to fill specific jobs are certainly a factor of wage rates. If there's a scarcity of talented or otherwise desired laborers for some jobs, that rather than the minimum wage will have a greater effect upon wage rates for those jobs.
But scarcity or surplus of labor is just an additional factor that's considered when determining wage differentials.
Even if there were perfect balances between availability of labor for any types of jobs, there would still be wage differentials between jobs and between employees. Doctors don't work for the same wage rates as cleaning ladies. Proficient programmer/analysts are paid more than people that can only create code from a flowchart provided to them.
The minimum wage rate sets a floor beyond which wages cannot pass. All other than precisely the exact minimum rate, are standing on the shoulders of the minimum rate.
When the minimum is increased, (due to wage differentials) all other rates are increased, but lower rates are increased more, and higher rates are increased less in proportion to their consequential wage rate.
To the extent of the minimum rate's purchasing power, it particularly bolsters lower wage rates. Among lower wage rates, it particularly reduces the extents and incidences of poverty among the working poor.
Respectfully, Supposn