- Aug 4, 2009
- 283,539
- 151,687
- 2,615
NASA also has the engineers and scientists that the armed forces don’t.Why can't NASA be reinvested and handle it? They are already up and running? What would a separate space force have that NASA doesn't already have or couldn't expand to handle?Pence details plan for creation of Space Force in what would be the sixth branch of the military
Mike Pence calls for Space Force by 2020 - CNNPolitics
The President Wants a Space Force. He Might Get One.
Pence said ^^^ in his speech, asking for $8 billion to build out the idea.
It's seven years behind schedule and $163 billion over budget, or as the man in charge of the F-35 told us, "basically the program ran itself off the rails." [Chris Bogdan: Good morning.]
oops, how do you FEEL, my boo boo.
Normally i would say no, however, space is a region that we need, as a race of beings, to conquer. Mankinds very survival requires that we be able to exist, and work in space. The sad truth is, the military has been responsible for more technological advancement than any other source. The space race too added to our technology, but we don't have one of those going on right now.
Thus, it makes sense to put resources towards development of a space force that can be used to defend the Earth from the next big asteroid that could wipe out civilization, if not life itself.
Not many Rocket Scientists in the Marines