How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?

[Stann]

1. Because it's on land, and a desert. So the temperature stays much colder due to lack of the temperature modulation that is a feature of large bodies of water.

The Antarctic gets very little moisture, but, that which it does get.....stays. For millions upon millions of years.

2. Once again, water. The area you speak of on Greenland is high altitude LAND. It gets snow, it stays.

3. The oceans warm and cool constantly. There are far more factors that go into hurricane production than mere ocean temps.

4. Land sinks all of the time. The oceans may be rising, but it is at a rate so slow that it is nearly impossible to measure. Suffice to say the alarmist claims are nonsense.

5. CO2 does none of those things. What you are talking about happen independently of CO2.

Now he will deny you facts and possibly introduce more garbage. It never ends. They cannot accept the truth , probably is a trumper too.

 

[Stann]

EMH, I have a question for you:
Is it more risky to die by being electrocuted in an electric boat or eaten by a shark 20 feet away?

Depends if the shark is behind a wall of glass or not. LOL.

 

[Wuwei]

Depends if the shark is behind a wall of glass or not. LOL.

Do you recognize that this was an inane question raised at least twice by Trump? Once at a rally and once in an interview.
I was looking for EHMs reaction.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Study: From NYC to D.C. and beyond, cities on the East Coast are sinking

Population centers are seeing areas of rapid “subsidence” alongside more slowly sinking or relatively stable ground, increasing the risk to roadways, runways, building foundations, rail lines, and pipelines, according to the research.

news.vt.edu

 

[Stann]

Do you recognize that this was an inane question raised at least twice by Trump? Once at a rally and once in an interview.
I was looking for EHMs reaction.

I thought it was a rather odd thing for you to say but I thought you were just giving him back some of his own BS. Beautiful day , out only yard enjoying it. Have a great day .

 

[EMH]

EMH, I have a question for you:
Is it more risky to die by being electrocuted in an electric boat or eaten by a shark 20 feet away?

Threats come only from cowards, and because you already CHICKENED OUT from answering basic climate questions....

 

[EMH]

The area you speak of on Greenland is high altitude LAND

LOL!!!

A truly lost lying moron we have here...

Ice age glacier digs. North American Ice Age dug the Great Lakes.

A failure to understand that produces silly answers from MORONS with NO CLUE....

 

[EMH]

Because it's on land

97% of Earth ice is on the two land masses closest to an Earth pole, and land moves.... you get partial credit there, but only for noticing land.... And if Earth ice is about WHERE LAND IS, then it isn't about Co2 or atmosphere or Sun...

The oceans warm and cool constantly. There are far more factors that go into hurricane production than mere ocean temps

A laughable attempt to spin and dodge, and completely refuted by what the Co2 FRAUD has already confessed on this issue...

How climate change makes hurricanes more destructive

As our climate warms, storms are becoming more destructive and costly. Why do hurricanes bring more rain in a warmer climate? Learn about it here.

www.edf.org

Hurricanes and Climate Change

www.c2es.org

Hurricanes are directly correlated with ocean temps. Wind shear and other issues, dust etc. are "weather" and do not matter when the subject is decade by decade....

Land sinks all of the time

Land attached to tectonic plates approaching Pacific Ring of Fire go down with the plate...

The image is distorted in the sense that the bend of the tectonic plate is not 45 degrees upon arrival at the fault, but rather the bend of the sinking plate is parabolic and stretches hundreds of miles, which is why the Marshall Islands are sinking as are all others approaching the PROF. But that is all that is sinking. The Co2 FRAUD used to lie about this, but they don't anymore, credit to.... yeah...

Life in a disappearing country

It's one of the clearest injustices of climate change: The Marshall Islands likely won't exist if we warm the planet 2 degrees. I traveled to the remote Pacific to learn what it's like to try to process that doomsday forecast. And why some people already are making the painful decision to leave...

www.cnn.com

CO2 does none of those things. What you are talking about happen independently of CO2

And neither did the Sun. What caused Greenland to freeze at the same time North America thawed is the direction of the tectonic plate movement. Greenland moved NW while NA moved SW, and Greenland only recently crossed into the 600 miles to the pole ICE AGE ZONE while NA, save Ellesmere island (0.3% of Earth ice), just moved out of it...


Grade - C

You didn't get everything wrong

 

[Stann]

You didn't get everything wrong

As opposed to you're reaching the wrong conclusions on what may be the greatest threat to mankind on this planet thus far.

 

[EMH]

As posed to you're reaching the wrong conclusions on what may be the greatest threat to mankind on this planet thus far.

This is "your evidence"


Theory - increasing atmospheric Co2 warms atmosphere

DATA - satellites and balloons

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling"

Translation from NBC - During a period of rising atmospheric Co2, more than three decades, highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere

Your Co2 FRAUD did not like that, so it FUDGED that data in 2005 to show "warming" that does not exist. The excuses used to FUDGE that data are laughable.

"orbit wobble" - would not affect satellite IR readings at all

"shade issue" - even assuming there was a "shade issue" it was CONSTANT the whole time, so a "correction" for that would be to add or subtract a CONSTANT to ALL DATA, which would keep a FLAT LINE a FLAT LINE, but instead your fudgebaking fraud heroes used this to change a flat line into an upward slope


There is NO ACTUAL DATA from INSTRUMENTS which supports the theory that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming NONE.

The only "evidence" is 100% pure taxpayer funded FUDGED FRAUD.


Science says THEORY REJECTED

"The Science" says FUDGE THE DATA and continue to BILK THE TAXPAYER OVER FRAUD

 

[Stann]

This is "your evidence"


Theory - increasing atmospheric Co2 warms atmosphere

DATA - satellites and balloons

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling"

Translation from NBC - During a period of rising atmospheric Co2, more than three decades, highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the atmosphere

Your Co2 FRAUD did not like that, so it FUDGED that data in 2005 to show "warming" that does not exist. The excuses used to FUDGE that data are laughable.

"orbit wobble" - would not affect satellite IR readings at all

"shade issue" - even assuming there was a "shade issue" it was CONSTANT the whole time, so a "correction" for that would be to add or subtract a CONSTANT to ALL DATA, which would keep a FLAT LINE a FLAT LINE, but instead your fudgebaking fraud heroes used this to change a flat line into an upward slope


There is NO ACTUAL DATA from INSTRUMENTS which supports the theory that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming NONE.

The only "evidence" is 100% pure taxpayer funded FUDGED FRAUD.


Science says THEORY REJECTED

"The Science" says FUDGE THE DATA and continue to BILK THE TAXPAYER OVER FRAUD

That is the opinion of 99% of the scientists in the world. I'll go with their superbly , overwhelming evidence as opposed to your hit and miss tibits of partial truths and / or .misinformation.

 

[EMH]

is the opinion of 99% of the scientists

Laughable. Those are the politicized taxpayer funded "climate scientists" who are all criminals.

Real scientists who excel in actual science overwhelmingly see it this way...


John F. Clauser had shared the Nobel Prize in physics last year before declaring Tuesday that “there is no climate crisis”

 

[Stann]

Laughable. Those are the politicized taxpayer funded "climate scientists" who are all criminals.

Imagine that , you actually believe most of the worlds scientists are crimes nals. Are you related to trump or do you just have the same mental illness .

Real scientists who excel in actual science overwhelmingly see it this way...

Your idea of real scientists are probably in Big Oil 's pockets. That would make their opinions very biased and most likely criminal.

John F. Clauser had shared the Nobel Prize in physics last year before declaring Tuesday that “there is no climate crisis”

Physics ? And he would know Climatology so well. I don't think so. Looked your guy u. He won the Nobel in 2023 for his work on quantum entanglement. After he won the award he shocked the scientific world by denying climate change. He must have snapped , very sad indeed. Ironically , Quantum physics can help solve climate change problems. His position denying it doesn't help anything.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

EMH, I have a question for you:
Is it more risky to die by being electrocuted in an electric boat or eaten by a shark 20 feet away?

Sharks and electricity don't kill people, it's the Jews!!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

As opposed to you're reaching the wrong conclusions on what may be the greatest threat to mankind on this planet thus far.

How many new nuclear reactors should we build?

 

[EMH]

you actually believe most of the worlds scientists are crimes nals

"climate scientists" are not scientists. They do not practice science. They simply take data showing no warming a FUDGE IT to show "warming" that does not exist. That is the crime of FRAUD.

by denying climate change

He did not "deny climate change." He simply correctly assessed that there is no climate crisis, because there isn't. Co2 does nothing. There is no ongoing net ice melt, no ocean rise, no ocean warming, no breakout in canes, and no warming in the atmosphere. The only real warming your Co2 FRAUD side has in the data is from growing urban areas...

Loading…

www.google.com

Everything else is FUDGE


Then there is the question of what causes Earth climate change, and the fact that


GREENLAND FROZE WHILE NORTH AMERICA THAWED

proves atmosphere, and hence Co2 in atmosphere, had NOTHING TO DO WITH EITHER EVENT


It is the Co2 FRAUD which DENIES the TRUTH ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE.

 

[Stann]

"climate scientists" are not scientists. They do not practice science. They simply take data showing no warming a FUDGE IT to show "warming" that does not exist. That is the crime of FRAUD.






He did not "deny climate change." He simply correctly assessed that there is no climate crisis, because there isn't. Co2 does nothing. There is no ongoing net ice melt, no ocean rise, no ocean warming, no breakout in canes, and no warming in the atmosphere. The only real warming your Co2 FRAUD side has in the data is from growing urban areas...

Loading…

www.google.com

Everything else is FUDGE


Then there is the question of what causes Earth climate change, and the fact that


GREENLAND FROZE WHILE NORTH AMERICA THAWED

proves atmosphere, and hence Co2 in atmosphere, had NOTHING TO DO WITH EITHER EVENT


It is the Co2 FRAUD which DENIES the TRUTH ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE.

Wrong again !

 

[Wuwei]

Here is a quiz for EMH
These are very basic and simple questions for those who know atmospheric science.

1. Why are atmospheric nitrogen or oxygen not greenhouse gasses?
2. Why are hydrofluorocarbons more effective greenhouse gasses than CO2?
3. Why does the earth retain more heat when the top of the troposphere gets colder?
4. What would happen if all the greenhouse gasses disappeared?

 

[Wuwei]

Wrong again !

You're right again.
I don't think he's wants to answer these questions. Too cowardly.

 

[EMH]

Here is a quiz for EMH
These are very basic and simple questions for those who know atmospheric science.

1. Why are atmospheric nitrogen or oxygen not greenhouse gasses?
2. Why are hydrofluorocarbons more effective greenhouse gasses than CO2?
3. Why does the earth retain more heat when the top of the troposphere gets colder?
4. What would happen if all the greenhouse gasses disappeared?

The answer is that none of that matters. We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons. Both showed NO WARMING for more than 3 decades of rising Co2 in the atmosphere.


When you claim N and O2 are not greenhouse gasses, that is laughable. Both hold heat. The more of each, the warmer the planet. So what. The atmosphere is not the cause of Earth climate change. The atmosphere changes as the climate changes. Jurassic had twice the surface air pressure of today.


and you are just so busted...

right here...

Broadband microwave absorption effects in 2D nitrogen capacitively coupled plasma under different operating conditions

In recent years, the interaction of electromagnetic waves (EM) with plasma sources under argon and helium discharges has been extensively studied due to its pot

pubs.aip.org

Broadband-microwave-absorption-effects-in-2D?redirectedFrom=fulltext


In recent years, the interaction of electromagnetic waves (EM) with plasma sources under argon and helium discharges has been extensively studied due to its potential applications in plasma stealth. However, nitrogen, as a more economical discharge gas, has been ignored in terms of its absorption of EM waves and stealth effect. In this work, a numerical calculation model combining two-dimensional capacitively coupled plasma (CCP) fluid model and EM wave model was developed to investigate the plasma uniformity degree and broadband microwave absorption effects in helium and nitrogen CCP. It is concluded that the two-dimensional model in this paper has more accurate and reasonable through comparison with the one-dimensional and experimental results in helium CCP. Nitrogen CCP shows better broadband absorption effects than that of helium, and helium plasma has better uniformity than nitrogen under the same discharge parameters



Nitrogen, as all other gasses, absorbs part of the EM spectrum, in this case microwave...

Microwaves are WEAK EM, weaker than WEAK IR, and hence adding small amounts of Co2 or N does nothing...

which is what the ATMOSPHERIC TEMP DATA always said.