How do we Know Human are Causing Climate Change?

[jc456]

Well, now it’s up your ass. Pull your draws down and look for it in this thread idiot. I don’t serve toads more than once during their breeding phase.

see, unless you give the post number as far as I'm concerned you didn't provide shit. I don't do your laundry.

 

[Dagosa]

see, unless you give the post number as far as I'm concerned you didn't provide shit. I don't do your laundry.

Well dufus, I just posted a list from Wikipedia.

 

[jc456]

Here is a list…

List of environmental research institutes - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I checked two of the institutions in that link and neither mentioned co2. So post one or you failed yet again.

 

[jc456]

Well dufus, I just posted a list from Wikipedia.

after I hit the send button. I rebuked your bullshit from your previous post. You don't get to bark at me.

 

[Dagosa]

where? no linky in this post I responded to.

2761
dufus, you even quoted from it.
How long have you been this stupid ?

 

[Dagosa]

I checked two of the institutions in that link and neither mentioned co2. So post one or you failed yet again.

Show them. Prove you did.

 

[jc456]

2761
dufus, you even quoted from it.
How long have you been this stupid ?

they say CO2 is a pollutant?--Nope, I did a search for the word pollutant, nothing coms up. fail again!!!

 

[Dagosa]

I checked two of the institutions in that link and neither mentioned co2. So post one or you failed yet again.

You said you check ?
Prive it. Show us the links to these two institution, or you’re a liar.

 

[jc456]

Show them. Prove you did.

• Centre for Energy and Environmental Markets (CEEM)
• Cooperative Research Centre

 

[Dagosa]

they say CO2 is a pollutant?--Nope, I did a search for the word pollutant, nothing coms up. fail again!!!

Nope, that’s your bullshit. name the institutions and the links you used. You are not trustworthy

 

[jc456]

Nope, that’s your bullshit. name the institutions and the links you used. You are not trustworthy

your link. It's obvious you have never read the links you post, you read titles and post. You're such a lazy fker.

How Exactly Does Carbon Dioxide Cause Global Warming?

CO2 molecules make up only a small percentage of the atmosphere, but their impact on our climate is huge. The reason comes down to physics and chemistry.

news.climate.columbia.edu

 

[Dagosa]

• Centre for Energy and Environmental Markets (CEEM)
• Cooperative Research Centre

Nope, show us where they said CO2 was not a pollutant.

 

[jc456]

Nope, show us where they said CO2 was not a pollutant.

they don't mention anything about it that's how.

You said they support you, no they don't, you fking dummass.

 

[Dagosa]

your link

How Exactly Does Carbon Dioxide Cause Global Warming?

CO2 molecules make up only a small percentage of the atmosphere, but their impact on our climate is huge. The reason comes down to physics and chemistry.

news.climate.columbia.edu

your link. It's obvious you have never read the links you post, you read titles and post. You're such a lazy fker.

How Exactly Does Carbon Dioxide Cause Global Warming?

CO2 molecules make up only a small percentage of the atmosphere, but their impact on our climate is huge. The reason comes down to physics and chemistry.

news.climate.columbia.edu

yup….
And the entire article describes how CO2 pollutes the atmosphere.

 

[jc456]

yup….
And the entire article describes how CO2 pollutes the atmosphere.

then post the passage that says that, I did a search for Pollute and got zero finds. Do you know what the find key is for reviewing documents? I bet you don't. Again, you didn't even read what the article said.

BTW, there is one word polluting, but it isn't in the article, it was someone's post. here


Iain Climie
Reply to John Sheppard
2 years ago
Hi John,
The obvious retort to sceptics is that many ideas essential if mainstream views are correct make sense even if climate change were a damp squib or temperatures fell e.g following a major volcanic eruption like Tambora in 1815. For that matter they work if a major food crop collapses. Typical actions include reducing waste, silviculture, regenerative agriculture, alternatives to fossil fuels (whose extraction can be polluting or destructive), fewer cash crops, combining conservation with careful use and cuttin

 

[Dagosa]

Nope, show us where they said CO2 was not a pollutant.

Dufus, that’s just a description of the facility. You have to ask them.

Nope, show us where they said CO2 was not a pollutant.

Facility from your choice….read it. this is the periodic newsletter from your choice of institutes dumbo

What is ‘carbon pollution’ and why are we trying to stop it?

You’ll doubtless have heard Australia is introducing a “carbon tax” this Sunday to reduce “carbon pollution”. What is being controlled is not just any carbon but emissions of a specific gas, carbon dioxide…

theconversation.com

 

[jc456]

Dufus, that’s just a description of the facility. You have to ask them.

why do I have to ask them anything, you said they backed you so get their statement and post it.

 

[jc456]

Dufus, that’s just a description of the facility. You have to ask them.

Facility from your choice….read it. this is the periodic newsletter from your choice of institutes dumbo

What is ‘carbon pollution’ and why are we trying to stop it?

You’ll doubtless have heard Australia is introducing a “carbon tax” this Sunday to reduce “carbon pollution”. What is being controlled is not just any carbon but emissions of a specific gas, carbon dioxide…

theconversation.com

that's not any scientific organization, you're still failing. The conversation? hahahahahaahahah

 

[Dagosa]

then post the passage that says that, I did a search for Pollute and got zero finds. Do you know what the find key is for reviewing documents? I bet you don't. Again, you didn't even read what the article said.

BTW, there is one word polluting, but it isn't in the article, it was someone's post. here


Iain Climie
Reply to John Sheppard
2 years ago
Hi John,
The obvious retort to sceptics is that many ideas essential if mainstream views are correct make sense even if climate change were a damp squib or temperatures fell e.g following a major volcanic eruption like Tambora in 1815. For that matter they work if a major food crop collapses. Typical actions include reducing waste, silviculture, regenerative agriculture, alternatives to fossil fuels (whose extraction can be polluting or destructive), fewer cash crops, combining conservation with careful use and cuttin

Boy you are ignorant

 

[Dagosa]

then post the passage that says that, I did a search for Pollute and got zero finds.

So you don’t know what pollution is do you ?