I like John Nolte...he points out the fact that modern liberal democrats lose wars that have already been won by the United States...and then act confused when the countries we abandon to the monsters turn into slaughter houses for the innocent...
Iraq & Vietnam: Democrats Lose Won Wars; Holocaust to Follow
Oh, the war in Iraq was won, but it wouldnÂ’t stay won without an American presence.
Regardless, the President bugged out of Iraq without an all-important status of forces agreement. In other words, like the stabilizing troops we still have in Japan, Germany, and South Korea -- we left no one in Iraq....
Iraq was won. All we had to do was leave behind an American force that would continue to mentor and hold the Iraqi army together, and work as a deterrent against terrorist adventurism.
Obama and his media minions blame the Iraqis for the failure of the status of forces agreement, but it was Obama who didn't want the deal and only made a symbolic push to win a deal. Before Iraq started falling apart, Obama continually bragged that the decision to pull all our troops from Iraq was his decision -- the keeping of a campaign promise.
Had the American President wanted American troops to remain in Iraq, no reasonable person believes this would not have been the outcome.
The fact is that it was Obama who ensured the premature pulling of our troops, because this is what Democrats doÂ…
Democrats lose won wars.
Vietnam was won.
Yep.
Your history teachers and professors don't tell you this; nor do media documentaries. But the Vietnam War was won and America won it.
In early 1973, North Vietnam and the Viet Cong knew they were defeated, came to the Paris Peace Accords, and agreed to end their aggression against our allies in the sovereign and free nation of South Vietnam.
With the war won, America pulled our troops. In order to keep the peace, we had to only agree to supply our allies in the South with any military hardware they would need should the North Vietnamese attempt to again invade the South.
The Vietnam War was wonÂ… until Democrats chose to intentionally lose it.
In November of 1974, three months after Nixon resigned in disgrace, Democrats won a landslide in the mid-term elections. The new Democrat majority in Congress de-funded our promised military aid to South Vietnam, and the Viet Cong made their move. Without American aid, the South Vietnamese were doomed.
Rinse-repeat...how democrats surrender nations we liberated...
So much blood on the hands of democrats...but control of the media allows them to sleep at night...
The idea that the US actually won in Viet Nam first came to me when I watched this episode of Charlie Rose.
I saw it on the air. I accessed the video numerous times at the Charlie Rose Show site as well as on YouTube.
Now the Charlie Rose Show people have started to monetize their archived interviews.
Oh well...
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/Charlie-Rose-March-31-2006/dp/B0031YHCGW/?tag=digitalca0daa06-20]Amazon.com: Charlie Rose 2006: Season 3, Episode 21 "Charlie Rose (March 31, 2006)": Amazon Instant Video[/ame]
After Col. Nagl helped with the US military field manual revision he retired and was the head of a D.C. Conservative think tank for a while. Now I think he writes and lectures.
I once exchanged posts with him at a small chat room with a specialized focus of guerilla warfare from the commander's perspective.
Anyway, Sorley, et al, pointed out how the replacement of Gen. Westmoreland with Gen. Creighton Abrams (yes the tank was named for him) made the difference in tactics being used in Viet Nam. The idea was to HOLD ONTO the villages you'd won. Make sure that insurgent elements were unable to get into the populations to intimidate and threaten or hurt and kill the villagers whose hearts and minds we needed to win.
This is what was found to work in Malaysia in the guerilla wars in the 1950's. And when the tactics learned there were tried in Viet Nam under Abrams it worked there, too.
So, while the war was being won in the field it was being lost in America by the liberals, the leftists, the Progressives and the radicals who want America to hurt, to suffer and to lose.
President Ford was the Judas Goat who presided over the Left's loss of Viet Nam.
Once Ford took office this week in 1974 he saw his role as that of healing America and so he presided over the US governments starving the South Vietnamese to death.
In fact, i don't recall ever hearing this story until I watched this episode of the Charlie Rose show.
Maybe this was the impetus for this new look at the role of Libs and Dems to snatch military defeat from the mouth of any possible US victories.
