Both CDSs and currency swaps were required to pick up the juicy underwriting fees for selling that debt to high yield funds in the US and China.
High yield funds needed DB to underwrite purchases of Greek government debt? Why?
Why would DB need a currency swap to sell Euro denominated debt?
Or a CDS?
Do you have any backup for these claims, or are you just making it up?
You haven't seen all of those ads for the "high yield zero duration" dollar denominated ETF? If so lucky man. I have no idea the name of the Chinese (Hong Kong I think) version all I know about that is the Chinese and Swiss police have an investigation going for two unlicensed companies that were purported counter-parties in the European (Greek) high yield market..
As mentioned earlier it was in the balance sheet DB reports. So I checked other sources and decided to use the lowest figure(s) I could find in a quick search. Zero hedge is currently reporting 54.7 T total
net exposure and 75T by another method of calculation. That bit of joy led to a bond downgrade to BBB+ 6/9/15 which is actually lower than Lehman's was three months before it went belly up. Throw in counter party risk and the possibility, bordering on certainty, that the books got cleaned by putting all the debts possible off the books after the failure of the easy-peasy ECB stress test and the 100 T number I saw reported sounds conservative to me.
The really strange aspect of this situation is that estimates based on the balance sheet and guidance appear to be rising 13%/month. I'll ask Kwazi about the current party line when I check to see if he wants an intro to another bank. He posted his resume on linked in today and I don't think he would have done that as a VP analyst for DB unless even more bad news had broke.