House passes resolution to honor Charlie Kirk, but 58 Dems vote against it

[DigitalDrifter]

Do they have the right to not vote for it OP, or do they have no choice under Trump & his Republicans Fascist America?

They are free to be the dicks that they are.

 

[MarcATL]

They are free to be the dicks that they are.

Just as Charlie was free to be the dick that he was.

God bless America.

 

[Rawley]

Do they have the right to not vote for it OP, or do they have no choice under Trump & his Republicans Fascist America?

Have you heard from any of them? Did they vote no because of some wording in the Resolution, or because they thought Kirk was not honorable?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Just as Charlie was free to be the dick that he was.

God bless America.

And just as you are.

 

[Mr Natural]

Does the house want to honor every podcaster that dies?

 

[Donald H]

Democrats lives are at risk when they speak out in public against the regime's demands..

Any who oppose the rise of fascism must organize an underground movement so they can speak from a safe refuge.

 

[BothWings]

I surprised that many dems voted for it.

They know better. They want to get re-elected. Besides, the "mission" was already accomplished, so supporting the posthumous honors is just turning a win into a win-win for the creeps.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Surprisingly however, more Dems voted for it.
Not surprisingly leftists such as AOC and her wing of extremists, voted against it.

House approves Charlie Kirk resolution ​

on bipartisan vote​

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/09/19/congress/house-approves-kirk-resolution-00572967

I like Charlie, but if it was Don Lemon who got clipped, I would hope no Republicans would vote for the resolution.

I know it is not fair to compare the 2, justices using a lefty to compare to a conservative.

These sorta ceremonial things should be left to the private sector. Let the government pass legislation with teeth that prevents this shit.

For starters, TIK TOK should have been banned. The CCP is manipulating our youth.

On the other hand, let them do what they want, but in the big picture it is really meaningless.

 

[konradv]

Surprisingly however, more Dems voted for it.
Not surprisingly leftists such as AOC and her wing of extremists, voted against it.

House approves Charlie Kirk resolution ​

on bipartisan vote​

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/09/19/congress/house-approves-kirk-resolution-00572967

Dems showed empathy, which frankly Kirk doesn’t deserve.

 

[Rawley]

Does the house want to honor every podcaster that dies?

Wow. Really?

 

[NetJedi]

It's a clear political move, and it showed that 58 Democrats have balls.

Just the opposite, it shows that 58 Democrats were afraid of pissing off their far-left base and far-left donors.

The Democrats that voted for it showed far more courage and I'm sure many of them will get dinged for it in upcoming primary races.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Dems showed empathy, which frankly Kirk doesn’t deserve.

So you approve of the Dims who voted for it?

 

[Hafar1014]

Surprisingly however, more Dems voted for it.
Not surprisingly leftists such as AOC and her wing of extremists, voted against it.

House approves Charlie Kirk resolution ​

on bipartisan vote​

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/09/19/congress/house-approves-kirk-resolution-00572967

58 democrats support murder why not they defend criminals perverts and child groomers

 

[odanny]

Just the opposite, it shows that 58 Democrats were afraid of pissing off their far-left base and far-left donors.

The Democrats that voted for it showed far more courage and I'm sure many of them will get dinged for it in upcoming primary races.

That certainly is one way of looking at it, I don't think many of those who voted in favor are going to get 'dinged', but some will correctly be viewed as caving in to this clear political move of someone who trashed you and your party.

It is little different than showing support to Rush Limbaugh or a number of others. His death is being used for political gain, Trump could have given two shits about Charlie Kirk, barely knew he existed.

Kimmel got fired for exposing him.

 

[The Duke]

58 out of 435, not a bad percentage. 58 in there are bad people, and the record of that vote should be publicized everywhere.
This is an America vs. usurpers problem, to put things in perspective.

 

[odanny]

58 democrats support murder why not they defend criminals perverts and child groomers

Like Trump?

 

[Hafar1014]

Like Trump?

Prove it we have seen a picture of Hunter with minor prostitutes and Clinton was Epstein's best customer.

 

[NetJedi]

That certainly is one way of looking at it, I don't think many of those who voted in favor are going to get 'dinged', but some will correctly be viewed as caving in to this clear political move of someone who trashed you and your party.

.. and rational, objective people will view it as a move by people with some compassion to honor a public figure who was savagely assassinated in a public setting, in front of a large group of college students. Believe it or not most people realize that some things should transcend political disagreements, apparently, you're not one of those people.

Trump could have given two shits about Charlie Kirk, barely knew he existed.

What???? Donald Trump and Charlie Kirk were not only close political allies but also close personal friends, you obviously don't know what you're talking about.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

You people say the same BS about anyone who disagrees with you.

Americans be like... I support a flat tax

Democrats be like... shut up you racist Nazi.

Democrats are the fascist they claim Americans to be

Democrats = traitors

All they can do is regurgitate liberal rage media lies and propaganda. They don't deserve a response.

 

[Zincwarrior]

What was the actual resolution?