House Judiciary Committee has released the video of special prosecutor Jack Smith’s deposition

He's quite stupid. His only chance was getting a partisan Democrat DC jury.
You don’t have to read Trump’s mind. He told us his intention was to change the outcome of the election. He kept repeating “I won” over and over again.
 
He's quite stupid. His only chance was getting a partisan Democrat DC jury.
I mean prosecutions are supposed to be some real serious stuff. Smith did this witch hunt based ob his psychic feelings about what Trump was thinking and the nefarious intentions of Trumps thoughts
It’s utterly laughable
 
I mean prosecutions are supposed to be some real serious stuff. Smith did this witch hunt based ob his psychic feelings about what Trump was thinking and the nefarious intentions of Trumps thoughts
It’s utterly laughable

Simple Jack is what the Biden admin (Obama admin retreads) wanted- an expendable Kamikaze drone prosecutor.
 
Within the first few seconds he tries to convince Raffensperger that thousands and thousands of votes are fraudulent and should be disregarded.

Raffensperger tries to tell him he’s wrong.

What is the timestamp for when Trump tells him "to take away valid votes"?

:popcorn:
 
Post #32.
Absolutely atrocious comparison.

Notably Trump faces no repercussions for engaging in litigation about the election, even when filing laughably absurd lawsuits that were almost universally rejected.

There’s no comparison with the behavior Smith noted in his indictment.
 
Absolutely atrocious comparison.

Notably Trump faces no repercussions for engaging in litigation about the election, even when filing laughably absurd lawsuits that were almost universally rejected.

There’s no comparison with the behavior Smith noted in his indictment.

When did Al Gore get indicted for trying to overturn the election?
 
What is the timestamp for when Trump tells him "to take away valid votes"?

:popcorn:
Starting at the beginning of the phone call, he’s telling him to take away votes. He justifies this request by claiming they’re invalid votes. That’s a lie. It’s why it constitutes fraud.
 
Starting at the beginning of the phone call, he’s telling him to take away votes. He justifies this request by claiming they’re invalid votes. That’s a lie. It’s why it constitutes fraud.

So, you just made it up. Got it. :auiqs.jpg:
 
That’s not at all what Jack Smith said. You shouldn’t lie.
He used a lot more words tonight try and make it sound like that’s not what he was saying, but when you separate the wheat from the chaff that’s what you’re left with
 
15th post
He used a lot more words tonight try and make it sound like that’s not what he was saying, but when you separate the wheat from the chaff that’s what you’re left with
Not at all. You’re lying.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom