House Ethics Concludes Swalwell Probe Into Link With Chinese Spy, Taking No Action.

[Catsnmeters]

So you must not have read post #54. That is where the entire sentence came from, I tried to help you out by highlighting the part I pasted.

It was manufactured 'oppo' research totally based on false information.

It's obvious Durham didn't pursue the intent. His purpose was to find the origins of the Russia Collusion claims, and he did an exemplary job of it.

You have to prove she new that. Durham couldn't or he would have recommended charges.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Intent is only relevant if Durham would have chosen to pursue an investigation into possible criminal charges over the Hillary's little creation.

Durham did note it is legal, however, you, yourself proved if intent was there, it would have been illegal. They are guilty, they manufactured false information.

Then there's this:



BTW, there is a direct link to Durham's report in this quote.

Yeah. I found a searchable link.

Hillary didn't 'create' anything. She used opposition research that she did not if true or not.

If criminal charges were available to be pursued, I am sure Durham would have made the recommendation. He didn't. Not sure how you can reconcile this fact. Nothing in his report indicates a crime was committed. End of story 4 years in the making.

 

[easyt65]

Ever notice how the Ethics Committee never held any of the Democrats accountable who created a committee whose only reason for existing was to use tax dollars to pay for the silence of victims of sexual misconduct?

Despite being proven to have engaged in criminal Insider Trading at least twice, her admitting it once, the Eyhics Committee ne er punished House Speaker Pelosi.

Despite havibg been proven D-Schiff lied to the American people, criminally altered transcripts, falsely claimed to have a whistleblower, misled the investigation into Trump over the Hillary Hoax, and criminally manufactured false evidence against the President of the United States in an attempt to overthrow the US govt by illegally removing a President from office the Ethics Committee has made no effort to take action against Schiff.

THE ETHICS COMMITTEE IS A FARCE, A CRIMINAL JOKE.

It is literally letting criminals police themselves.

 

[Delldude]

You have to prove she new that.

Quite obvious....I don't have to prove anything.

Nonetheless, the intelligence on Clinton's plan was shared with Obama, Clapper and other top national security officials right after U.S. officials became aware of it in 2016, according to the report, which outlined what followed.

On Aug. 3, 2016, within days of receiving the Clinton plan in late July, then-CIA Director John Brennan met with Obama, Joe Biden (who was vice president at the time) and other senior officials to discuss Russian efforts to interfere in the election.

'Clinton's plan'......that's ownership.

Nothing in his report indicates a crime was committed.

Nothing in the report indicates a crime wasn't committed.

Hillary didn't 'create' anything. She used opposition research that she did not if true or not.

She manufactured oppo research. References by Durham's findings make it abundantly clear.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Quite obvious....I don't have to prove anything.

You are correct. You don't. But prosecutors would and they can't they can't, this; no prosecutors.

Is it all coming together now?

'Clinton's plan'......that's ownership.

Yep. Opposition research is a plan.

Just like all other modern presidential candidate.

Nothing in the report indicates a crime wasn't committed.

So?

What we care about is if the report recommends charges. It didn't.

She manufactured oppo research. References by Durham's findings make it abundantly clear.

She manufactured nothing. She used steels report in opposition research.

If some of that turned out to be wrong, then that's the breaks. You still have to prove she knew it was a lie...which you can't.

 

[Delldude]

But prosecutors would and they can't they can't, this; no prosecutors.

Ever hear of prosecutorial discretion?

Opposition research is a plan.

Based upon facts.

What we care about is if the report recommends charges.

Prosecutorial discretion.

She manufactured nothing.

According to several intel sources in the report, she and her campaign fabricated the scandal to take the heat of her deletion of some 33,000 emails from a non approved non governmental server.......probably 33,000 incriminating emails from the Clinton Foundation Foreign money laundering.

Nah, she'd never create a fake story to take the heat off her ass.

If some of that turned out to be wrong, then that's the breaks.

No, that's what the fact checkers do and then they embarrass the candidate.
Notice no one fact checked the story when it came out, they just ran with it.
About the only ones doing a deep dive were the conservatives and the left came out in droves with denial after denial.

Wonder why they did that?

Trump...Trump....Trump

 

[Catsnmeters]

Ever hear of prosecutorial discretion?

Based upon facts.

Prosecutorial discretion.

Yes. So your saying he found crimes but didn't list them and decided not to prosecute?

According to several intel sources in the report, she and her campaign fabricated the scandal to take the heat of her deletion of some 33,000 emails from a non approved non governmental server.......probably 33,000 incriminating emails from the Clinton Foundation Foreign money laundering.

Yet no proof.

Nah, she'd never create a fake story to take the heat off her ass.

Maybe she would but the law is based on what you can prove, not what think.

No, that's what the fact checkers do and then they embarrass the candidate.
Notice no one fact checked the story when it came out, they just ran with it.
About the only ones doing a deep dive were the conservatives and the left came out in droves with denial after denial.

Wonder why they did that?

How do you know they didn't fact check?

What didn't they fact check? Example please.

Trump...Trump....Trump

 

[Delldude]

She manufactured nothing. She used steels report in opposition research.

It doesn't get done without Hillary's nod.

CNN —

Hillary Clinton personally approved her campaign’s plans in fall 2016 to share information with a reporter about an uncorroborated alleged server backchannel between Donald Trump and a top Russian bank, her former campaign manager testified Friday in federal court.

Robby Mook said he attended a meeting with other senior campaign officials where they learned about strange cyberactivity that suggested a relationship between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which is based in Moscow. The group decided to share the information with a reporter, and Mook subsequently ran that decision by Clinton herself.

“We discussed it with Hillary,” Mook said, later adding that “she agreed with the decision.”
____________________________
Slate published a story on October 31, 2016, raising questions about the odd Trump-Alfa cyber links. After that story came out, Clinton tweeted about it, and posted a news release that said, “This secret hotline may be the key to unlocking the mystery of Trump’s ties to Russia.”

Hillary Clinton personally approved plan to share Trump-Russia allegation with the press in 2016, campaign manager says | CNN Politics

Hillary Clinton personally approved her campaign's plans in fall 2016 to share information with a reporter about an uncorroborated alleged server backchannel between Donald Trump and a top Russian bank, her former campaign manager testified Friday in federal court.

www.cnn.com

 

[Catsnmeters]

It doesn't get done without Hillary's nod.

CNN —

Hillary Clinton personally approved her campaign’s plans in fall 2016 to share information with a reporter about an uncorroborated alleged server backchannel between Donald Trump and a top Russian bank, her former campaign manager testified Friday in federal court.

Robby Mook said he attended a meeting with other senior campaign officials where they learned about strange cyberactivity that suggested a relationship between the Trump Organization and Alfa Bank, which is based in Moscow. The group decided to share the information with a reporter, and Mook subsequently ran that decision by Clinton herself.

“We discussed it with Hillary,” Mook said, later adding that “she agreed with the decision.”
____________________________
Slate published a story on October 31, 2016, raising questions about the odd Trump-Alfa cyber links. After that story came out, Clinton tweeted about it, and posted a news release that said, “This secret hotline may be the key to unlocking the mystery of Trump’s ties to Russia.”

Hillary Clinton personally approved plan to share Trump-Russia allegation with the press in 2016, campaign manager says | CNN Politics

Hillary Clinton personally approved her campaign's plans in fall 2016 to share information with a reporter about an uncorroborated alleged server backchannel between Donald Trump and a top Russian bank, her former campaign manager testified Friday in federal court.

www.cnn.com

Yeah? So?

What's the problem?

 

[Delldude]

Yeah? So?

What's the problem?

Like I said, Hillary's the one.