The OP is a scam. We're in a 2 decade long pause. The only way they created the imaginary "warming" is by adding the imaginary "warming" in the oceans.
It's a total fabrication
I keep hearing these accusations that all the climate scientists who publish or speak in support of global warming are liars. I think to myself, if they are lying what is their motive? I've never come up with or heard a convincing motive for such a vast conspiracy of lies. I've heard a few motives for a conspiracy to assassinate JFK that if tied in with other indisputable evidence could be credible. Same with various 9/11 theories. Like any building or structure a good conspiracy theory has to have a solid foundation. A convincing motive is a necessary part of that foundation and I just don't see one here. Of course I don't know enough of the science to be sure by the science alone that global warming is a reality. I have to look at the whole context, the backstories, the methodology, the reputation of the scientists who advance the theory, etc. etc. Right now I'm about 80% there in accepting that global warming is an existential fact caused by human behavior in the last 150 yrs. or so and not just a periodic, cyclic or random change in climate pattern.
Taking that into account and knowing that change in climate and environment has been responsible for many mass extinctions since life originated on this planet I come to the conclusion that we should get off our ass and, if it's not too late as some of the more pessimistic say, do as much as we can as fast as we can to stop the descent into environmental catastrophe. And hey, if they are wrong, if I am wrong, we end up with a cleaner more beautiful world as a consolation prize.
"GW has nothing to do with making the planet cleaner, although a nobel cause GW has only to do with temperature.
If you really believe this, "GW has nothing to do with making the planet cleaner, although a nobel cause GW has only to do with temperature." one of us has absolutely no idea how the factors that "they" say contribute to global warming affect our environment and the global ecosystem.
For instance you do realize that coal burning is claimed to be a big contributor to GW?
Beijing is being choked with air pollution, you really think this has nothing to do with GW or making the world a more ugly place? Take GW out of the equation, by tackling the causes of air pollution you're still making the world a "cleaner more beautiful place". Do you know any of the story of LA's battle against smog? It's a decades long drama that doesn't tell a very flattering story about industry. The county formed the first air pollution board in 1947.
But "it wasn’t until 1975 that the U.S. required new cars to have catalytic converters, “the key piece of technology that allowed everything to change,” according to Mary Nichols, chairman of California’s Air Resources Board. In between, there were frustrating years of scientific research, industry denial, politics, protest and an unwavering attachment to the automobile".
"Automakers were slow to respond, wary of any change that would add cost to their vehicles. “It’s like the stages of grief,” said Nichols. “At first you deny it. Then you fight against it. And finally you grudgingly accept it, embrace it and move on.” That process took almost two decades."
Just the story of how the petroleum industry fought admitting that lead in gasoline was deadly makes for reading like a great thriller of a novel, with spying, phony research, lying and character assassination involved. Rule #1 - Don't believe anything Industry tells you about Global Warming, you
think GW scientists are liars? Industry has proven over and over again they will keep lying until they can't get away with it anymore - think
Tobacco Industry also.
How smog is killing thousands daily in China | Asia | DW.COM | 17.08.2015
How smog is killing thousands daily in China
A new US study found that air pollution kills about 4,000 Chinese people a day. But what are the main contributors and is Beijing doing enough to tackle the issue? DW spoke to the authors of the study.
Richard Muller and Robert Rohde: The dominant air pollution for health impact is PM2.5. That stands for "Particulate Matter" 2.5 microns and smaller. Previously people thought that this came from many sources, including automobiles, agricultural dust, dust from their extensive loess deposits, and from coal.
This is small scale coal burning in China, but you know what they say "Every little bit hurts" Coal burning ==
>Global warming==
>environmental destruction==
>
uglier world. Again take out GW and you can't deny the rest.
(Cont'd)
"Our analysis indicates that it comes primarily from coal, used for electric power, for industrial energy, and for heating. The key to seeing this is that the sources of the PM2.5 closely match the sources of sulfur. Beijing is a major source of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), from automobiles, but not a major source of sulfur or PM2.5."
How about the beauty and eco-importance of coral reefs. Isn't their destruction related to pollution, GW or not?
Coral bleaching results when the coral polyps expel their zooxanthellae symbionts from their tissues revealing their underlying, white skeleton. Without zooxanthellae, the coral polyps lose nutrition and have less energy available for growth or reproduction.
- Coral bleaching is linked to higher than normal temperatures, pollution, and exposure to air.
- Within a region, massive coral bleaching events can occur with as little of a temperature increase as 1 to 2°C above normal for a few weeks.
- Since 1979, these mass bleaching events seem correlated with severe El Niño Southern Oscillation events.
- Full recovery of coral reefs from these events often takes decades.
Does anyone disagree that the Amazon Basin is one of the most beautiful environments on earth? And that deforestation not only destroys that beauty but potentially mortally affects the earth's ability to deal with CO2 and replenish our oxygen?
http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/gw-effects/
"Journey into the heart of Amazonia, with its vast rivers and forests where thousands of plant and animal species live in a delicate balance-a balance that's increasingly threatened by logging, mining, agriculture, roadbuilding, oil and gas drilling."
That was a long-winded reply but do you still think that pollution has nothing to do with GW and vice versa? And that the things they say cause global warming can also destroy parts of the world we humans consider beautiful?
