No, actually I don't want children to be brought into the world at all unless it's in an intact mother father home. Deliberately bringing a child into anything else is wrong.
Your arbitrary value judgement don't actually describe any qualitative differences. Children raised in same sex households are just as healthy and well adjusted as those in different sex households.
I'd say there's an argument to be made that same sex households are more likely to produce good outcomes.
As unlike hetero couples, there are no accidental pregnancies. All pregnancies are planned with same sex couples. And thus, there's more control over the timing, both financially and emotionally. This control over timing is more likely to produce situations in which parents are able to provide the resources that a child needs for a healthy upbringing.
All you're doing is moving a child from one less than ideal home to another. Gays don't want to wait in line behind eligible mother father families who would be better for the child, in fact they want affirmative action. This is because homosexuality in general is an exercise in selfishness. You want what you want and you don't care who it hurts.
Ah, but you forget: children in same sex households are as healthy and well adjusted as those in hetero households. So the 'less the ideal' situation you assume in a same sex household is speculative on its face and disprove by evidence. As you're using value judgments that describe no qualitative differences. It would be like saying that the color green is 'less than ideal'.
In contrast, a child in foster care or waiting for adoption is in a measurably poorer situation qualitatively. They tend to have worse outcomes educational, financially, emotionally, and in relation to the law.
Meaning the transfer of a child from such a measurably poorer situation of foster care in a measurably better situation of a two parent household is a definable improvement.
So how would improving the situation of a child be immoral? Your arbitrary value judgments are not only useless.....they're pretty void of logic or reason.
This is all about self service. Gays want to live the homosexual lifestyle while still reaping the benefits of heterosexual marriage.
Depends on what you mean by the 'gay lifestyle'. If you mean that some gays want to raise families together with a loving, committed, monogamous, long term partner, then absolutely. I'd agree that many gays and lesbians want that.
So they go through unnatural processes to obtain children that by right they shouldn't have.
That's just an arbitrary value judgment again with no rational reason why they shouldn't have them. Infertility isn't a major obstacle for many straight folks that want to be parents. Its no more an impediment for gays and lesbians.
As for should, that's mere personal opinion. And in such situations, that's a judgment best left to those who are going to be raising the child, as they are the one's best informed on the situation. Your ignorance of the specifics of a given situation precludes the any particular value in your assessment.
In short, you don't know what you're talking about.
We're not talking about barren couples adopting after trying to bear children naturally, we're talking about people who, though fertile, opted for a lifestyle that precludes children but wants them anyway. This is selfish. They don't do it for the children, they do it for their own damnable gratification.
See above for you not having the slightest clue what you're talking about. You have no idea what motivates any given couple. Let alone all of them. Yet you claim to speak for every gay or lesbian couple that might ever start a family. That's silly.
You're offering us a sweeping overgeneralization based on zero evidence. And backed with nothing but your own personal opinion. Why would gays and lesbians have any different reasons for wanting a family than any one else? Or any family that adopts for the non-biological parent?
There's no logical or rational reason why there would be any difference. You're offering us your own personal prejudices rather than a reasoned argument. And your prejudices are absurd.
It's sick and it's further proof of how homosexuals incur eternal judgment. Someday you will have to answer for all this.
There's nothing sick about wanting to raise a family. That you think there is tell us far more about you than it does about any gay or lesbian.
