Holy sh**!!! Comey: "If an FBI agent did what Hillary did they'd face 'severe consequences'!!??

Honey, look at this statute, and do remember she signed a statement acknowledging how to handle records upon taking office-

18 U.S.C. § 1924: Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Material
The same charge Sandy Berger was found guilty of

(a)

Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documentsor materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.


So he admitted Hillary just got away with crimes becauae of who she is....got it.

No. More like her position as sec of state . The rules for the head of the FBI are not the same for some FBI agent .

WRONG.

You just said the laws don't apply to the FBI head the same way they do to an FBI newbie. WRONG WRONG WRONG.

The law is the law.

And once again....we're seeing the left supporting a lawless society....a banana republic style government where the law is only there to throw at the people they want.

Point out the part of the law she so dastardly violated ? Have u even looked at the elements of the law ?

18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
She signed a statement claiming to know the difference is not voided by Comey saying she was too stupid to know...
YES!
 
Comey stated that he has no proof that Hillary's private server was hacked. Well, Hillary obviously had better security on her private server than State Department - because we know for a fact it was hacked (worst ever).
 
[

WRONG.

You just said the laws don't apply to the FBI head the same way they do to an FBI newbie. WRONG WRONG WRONG.

The law is the law.

And once again....we're seeing the left supporting a lawless society....a banana republic style government where the law is only there to throw at the people they want.

What we see here is that leftist morons like Timmy actually demand that laws be different for rulers than for the ruled.

No. It's because their jobs are different .

Can an FBI agent just call a press conf and talk of the details of Hilary's investigation ?
Another good Democrat acknowledging they think the law should only apply to the little people.
 
Well yeah that does give me pause....but it's obvious she perjured herself. She tells so many lies she can't keep track of them

One thing that impressed me about Bill Clinton was that he could tell a thousand different lies to a thousand different people, and keep track of them all. THAT took some serious brain power. Clinton was easily the smartest president in my lifetime. Evil, but damned smart.

Hillary is not Bill, not by a country mile.
His serious brainpower disappeared when he tried, "It depends what the meaning of "is" is."
 
Comey stated that he has no proof that Hillary's private server was hacked. Well, Hillary obviously had better security on her private server than State Department - because we know for a fact it was hacked (worst ever).
Her own IT specialist had to shut her server down twice because it was being hacked.

Also, as Comey said, using personal unencrypted devices on trips to places like Tussia and China almost guarantees thise were hacked & secrets were compromised.
 
Comey stated that he has no proof that Hillary's private server was hacked. Well, Hillary obviously had better security on her private server than State Department - because we know for a fact it was hacked (worst ever).
"Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account."
 
[

exactly. just goes to show the typical gaping whole in their everyday attempts at logic.

newsflash: "the average American" is not acting as Secretary of State of the U.S.A. until maybe they are, in which case the end result of these same circumstances would be the very same non prosecution.

so sorry rabid hacks, the U.S.A. doesn't take prosecuting our SoS frivolously.



"our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."

So, what you're saying is that having different laws for our rulers is a good thing?

Or in the original vernacular; "four legs good, two legs BETTER."

I realize you are far from the best and brightest this nation has to offer, but when I read the idiocy you post, I cannot escape the fact that this nation is doomed.

You really DID just argue against equal justice under the law, and you lack the intellect to grasp why this is a problem.
 
Comey stated that he has no proof that Hillary's private server was hacked. Well, Hillary obviously had better security on her private server than State Department - because we know for a fact it was hacked (worst ever).
"Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account."

Funny. He stated today that he doesn't know if Hillary's private server was hacked. Pay attention...
 
Comey is a REPUBLICAN. His statements reflect what the FBI requires. Hillary Clinton is NOT an FBI agent.

Intent is everything. Did you INTEND to screw something up a work? Probably not, so you're not investigated and prosecuted for it. If we were, 99% of the citizens of this country would be investigated, prosecuted and thrown in jail for workplace BLUNDERS.

Furthermore, if they charged Hillary Clinton with anything, they would also have to do investigations into Colin Powell and Condi Rice's emails as they have the same issues.
State Department: Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice staffers received classified info via personal email - CNNPolitics.com

It was a Senior IT staffer who worked at the State Department who set up Hillary Clinton's server. Now one would think that a Senior IT staffer working at the state department would know that it was wrong to set up a separate server for her. He obviously didn't know, probably because he had done others, and it was never an issue until now. Of course he pleaded the 5th to save his own arse.

12darcy-hillaryjpg-a9c0699bbcc242ff.jpg


These Reich wing dog & pony shows are backfiring on Republicans. They cost the taxpayers of this country millions of dollars to do, and if they don't stop--the Republican party will be destroyed over them.

The Bullshit that hacks use to cover for their rulers.

Judge: Did you INTEND to hit and kill that child while you were driving drunk?

Defendant: No your honor.

Judge: Well, then you are free to go, since there was no intent..


kn070716dAPC20160705115011.jpg

So your drunk driver is guilty if 1st degree murder? No he's not . So yes intent is part of most crimes .

It's part of that criminal law that you think HILLARY violated .
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
 
Comey stated that he has no proof that Hillary's private server was hacked. Well, Hillary obviously had better security on her private server than State Department - because we know for a fact it was hacked (worst ever).
"Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account."

Funny. He stated today that he doesn't know if Hillary's private server was hacked. Pay attention...
You are certifiably stupid.

"But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence."
 
The Bullshit that hacks use to cover for their rulers.

Judge: Did you INTEND to hit and kill that child while you were driving drunk?

Defendant: No your honor.

Judge: Well, then you are free to go, since there was no intent..


kn070716dAPC20160705115011.jpg


you're comparing drunk driving to SoS email correspondence...

but the justice department and the fbi should take intellect lessons from YOU? :laugh2:
 
Apparently building the server isn't intent to...well...build the server.
Apparently her being told it was wrong...and doing it anyway...isn't intent.
Apparently a law that doesn't require intent....requires intent.
 
[
So your drunk driver is guilty if 1st degree murder? No he's not . So yes intent is part of most crimes .

No shit fer brains, it rarely is a factor.

It's part of that criminal law that you think HILLARY violated .
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

False

Read the fucking statute, moron.

{
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.}


But Hillary is above the law, so this doesn't count,
 
Comey is a REPUBLICAN. His statements reflect what the FBI requires. Hillary Clinton is NOT an FBI agent.

Intent is everything. Did you INTEND to screw something up a work? Probably not, so you're not investigated and prosecuted for it. If we were, 99% of the citizens of this country would be investigated, prosecuted and thrown in jail for workplace BLUNDERS.

Furthermore, if they charged Hillary Clinton with anything, they would also have to do investigations into Colin Powell and Condi Rice's emails as they have the same issues.
State Department: Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice staffers received classified info via personal email - CNNPolitics.com

It was a Senior IT staffer who worked at the State Department who set up Hillary Clinton's server. Now one would think that a Senior IT staffer working at the state department would know that it was wrong to set up a separate server for her. He obviously didn't know, probably because he had done others, and it was never an issue until now. Of course he pleaded the 5th to save his own arse.

12darcy-hillaryjpg-a9c0699bbcc242ff.jpg


These Reich wing dog & pony shows are backfiring on Republicans. They cost the taxpayers of this country millions of dollars to do, and if they don't stop--the Republican party will be destroyed over them.

The Bullshit that hacks use to cover for their rulers.

Judge: Did you INTEND to hit and kill that child while you were driving drunk?

Defendant: No your honor.

Judge: Well, then you are free to go, since there was no intent..


kn070716dAPC20160705115011.jpg

So your drunk driver is guilty if 1st degree murder? No he's not . So yes intent is part of most crimes .

It's part of that criminal law that you think HILLARY violated .
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
1st degree muderers has a definition, moron.

It's like doing 55 in a 20 zone and getting off because you didn't see the speed zone sign.
 
you're comparing drunk driving to SoS email correspondence...

but the justice department and the fbi should take intellect lessons from YOU? :laugh2:


Look, you are a hack who holds party above nation. And you aren't a very bright one at that. Intent is not relevant, Comey admitted he inserted the clause where it did not belong.

You demand that Hillary, as a party boss, is "too big to prosecute."

That is all there is to this.
 
[
So your drunk driver is guilty if 1st degree murder? No he's not . So yes intent is part of most crimes .

No shit fer brains, it rarely is a factor.

It's part of that criminal law that you think HILLARY violated .
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

False

Read the fucking statute, moron.

{
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.}


But Hillary is above the law, so this doesn't count,

First line of the code : see "intent"???

(a)
Whoever, for the purpose of obtaining information respecting the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information is to be used to the injury of the United States, or to th
 
Here's a link to the actual video of Comey's testimony today. It's live, and is still going on as I type this, not one from yesterday as little teapartypees tried to divert attention to, before running away.

 
you're comparing drunk driving to SoS email correspondence...

but the justice department and the fbi should take intellect lessons from YOU? :laugh2:

Look, you are a hack who holds party above nation. And you aren't a very bright one at that. Intent is not relevant, Comey admitted he inserted the clause where it did not belong.

You demand that Hillary, as a party boss, is "too big to prosecute."

That is all there is to this.



this partisan witch hunt is based on rabid hacks putting party over country.

our SoS used her email openly and without incident.

there is no proof of any security breach whatsoever.

given all of the FACTS, no reasonable prosecutor would bring a case.

that leaves unreasonable knuckleheads like you impotently crying in your beer boo hoo hoo
 
In a way....I almost think I should applaud Comey instead of ripping him.

He's not trying to insult our intelligence by trying to sugar coat it.

He's flat out saying it. The law doesn't apply equally. Hillary is different. Yes...we changed the law to fit the outcome. Yes....if a peasant did what she did they'd be fucked. She's not.

He was brutally honest. She's above all this.

NOW you get it.

That is exactly what Comey is doing. He lacks the power to do anything to a party boss, but he can and did explain that the concept of equality under the law is a farce.

Hillary is not subject to the law, period.

And fucking scum like Rati and Timmy will vote for her, because they hold party above country.

The question is, are enough voters in this nation fucking scum like Rati and Timmy to put this crook in office, and to piss on the notion of justice for all?
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom