Hold This L: Judge curb-stomps the GOP's pathetic pentagon press ban

Yeah, that's a lie.

Ok, and that’s your opinion. All we can do is go with what we have. You think they are trying to cover something up? Ok, you can have that opinion, and I can have the opinion of taking them at their word.
 
I'm beginning to think some of these judges - a lot of them, actually - need to be "disappeared" in the middle of the night.
This isn't a g.d. 1st Amendment issue at all.
It's a matter of national security.
And outright lying, as well.

Nah, we don’t need to “disappear” anyone. Just call out their BS and vote for change.
 
He did nothing of the kind. Your insidious lie implying the media was inappropriately reporting on "troop and war plan information" is made more egregious by the fact that it was Hegseth, during an unsecure Signal chat conversation, that discussed attack plans. From the judge's ruling......................

For example, during the heated controversy over the publication of the Pentagon
Papers, the government fought The Times and The Washington Post in court rather than retaliating by attempting to exclude journalists from those organizations from the Pentagon. Notwithstanding the Department’s strong desire to prevent the Pentagon Papers’ release, the Department did not threaten to revoke the reporters’ credentials, and press briefings continued as normal. See Press Ass’n Br. at 6. Likewise, the Department did not attempt to exclude journalists from the Pentagon following the publication of stories describing the toxicity of Agent Orange used during the Vietnam War, or the reporting on the “Fat Leonard” corruption scandal involving serious threats to national security, or a host of other revelations from the media. See Committee Br. at 13-15. And as counsel for the Pentagon Press Association as amicus curiae recounted at oral argument:

When General Westmoreland was upset that CBS was reporting misinformation about the Vietnam War, he sued. But no reporter lost their credentials. When 60 Minutes published photos of Abu Ghraib, they did a public service. The Pentagon was upset, it was a disclosure of unauthorized information. But no one reached out to yank credentials.


The ruling was that the Pentagon can't suspend the press credentials of reporters as a means to intimidate them in to only reporting information approved by the military.


U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman in his ruling acknowledged the importance of protecting American troops and war plans but said it was "more important than ever that the public have access to information from a variety of perspectives about what its government is doing" given President Donald Trump's recent "incursion" into Venezuelaand war with Iran.

I mean, it’s almost a direct quote.
 
Absolute clown behavior.
How many times has this middle school shit show had their ass handed to them in court over the last ten years?

One might wear out their abacus calculating that one.

The one great exception, of course, is Judge Cannon, who heroically and single-handedly kept Trump out of jail.
 
Maybe the reality of whats going on with the information we get, is a lack of HONESTY.
And tons of political spin on Every situation.
 
Watching the GOP get legally pantsed again is my favorite genre of comedy. A federal judge just nuked your authoritarian Pentagon press ban because…surprise!…the First Amendment actually exists.

You hypocrites scream about "freedom" non-stop, then try to lock out journalists because your egos are too soft to handle tough questions. Absolute clown behavior.
Hegseth allowed only right wing ass kissing outlets like the Gateway Pundit to pitch the softballs. The real press corps is laughing:

Hegseth tried to legally bully the press, then got relentlessly body-slammed by a judge, the New York Times and others are laughing.
View attachment 1233277
Another liberal judge trying to grab power and fame…let’s see him enforce it.
 
How many times has this middle school shit show had their ass handed to them in court over the last ten years?

One might wear out their abacus calculating that one.

The one great exception, of course, is Judge Cannon, who heroically and single-handedly kept Trump out of jail.
I get the feeling you wouldn’t be for this crap if a democrat were being the recipient
 
Ok, and that’s your opinion. All we can do is go with what we have. You think they are trying to cover something up? Ok, you can have that opinion, and I can have the opinion of taking them at their word.
Nope, it's a fact.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom