THAT STILL DOESNT MAKE THEM NAZIS, moron!
What does it make them then ?
IT makes them 'Far right', Tommy and not all right wingers are Nazis.
And who says all blacks should be sterilized? Got a linkn?
Check out post 97. She isnt embarrassed about it at all. Sterilising whole races is pretty extreme in my opinion.
Gang-rape, chopping heads off, burning people alive, crucifying people, buring people alive, selling women and children into sex slavery is pretty extreme in many peoples' opinion also.
Not in YOUR opinion though, as this is all not only what you often defend, but more often than you you DENY your Islamic Pets even DO these things.
In the civilised world ...........your foul mindset renders your opinion on anything worthless.
Speaking of civilization. This is your civilization Tommy.
"The
Aylesbury sex gang was a group of six men of South Asian heritage who committed serious sexual offences against two
under-aged girls in the
Englishtown of
Aylesbury,
Buckinghamshire. In July 2015, they were found guilty of offences including rape and child prostitution over a period extending from 2006 to 2012. The child protection charity
Barnardo's stated that it had worked with the two girls in 2008 and referred one of them to Buckinghamshire County Council as in danger of child sex exploitation. The council did not respond adequately and, following the convictions, apologised to the two girls for its failure to protect them."
Your government failed to react after being notified of the sexual abuse of children by a group of six men of "South Asian" heritage in 2008, and no arrestes were made until SEVEN YEARS LATER.
"As in the
Oxford,
Rochdale,
Derby,
Rotherham,
Telford,
Bristol and
Peterborough prosecutions, the gang used gifts of food, alcohol, drugs and DVDs to win the girls' trust before initiating abusive sexual relationships. The girls, referred to in court as Girl A and Girl B, were subsequently trafficked as child prostitutes in Aylesbury. One girl gave evidence that she had had sex with 60 men, almost all of Asian heritage, when she was only 12 or 13, having been "conditioned to think it was normal behaviour" "
So, Tommy, what are the benefits of importing all these Third Worlders?
"David Johnston, Buckinghamshire county council director for children’s services, issued an apology to the two girls, saying: “We are as appalled as all parents and the community of Buckinghamshire will be by the despicable acts of cruel abuse committed by those found guilty at the Old Bailey today." He thanked them for their bravery in giving evidence and helping to secure convictions against some of their abusers.
[4] The chief executive of Barnardo's, Javed Khan, said that the case proved that perpetrators would pay for the "horrific crime" of child abuse and said that the "bravery of the victims giving evidence in this case should be commended."
[1]
Sentencing and judge's comments[edit]
Following conviction in July 2015, the men were sentenced in September to jail terms ranging from three to nineteen-and-a-half years.
[5] Judge John Bevan
QCsaid that "for the price of a McDonald's, a milkshake and cinema ticket", Girl A was sexually exploited by "stall holders in Aylesbury market, taxi and bus drivers". He said he could not explain why the criminals "focused their attention on white under-age girls", but believed their "vulnerability" played a major role. He claimed that if the criminals had targeted "Asian under-age girls, they would have paid a heavy price in their community."
[5] Girl A herself made a statement speaking of the effects of her exploitation by up to 60 Asian men, describing her feelings of "worthlessness" and her battles with depression and alcohol addiction. She added that she felt that her "teenage years were taken away". In her statement, Girl B said that the sentences was "academic" because "no sentence could ever put right what happened".
[5]
Judge Bevan also commented on the use of
interpreters during the trial, noting that their services had cost a "minimum of £25,000, quite possibly double that". He expressed concern that the criminals, one of whom had been resident in Britain since 1999, should have required interpretation from English into
Hindi,
Urdu,
Pashto and
Punjabi and questioned whether a defendant who "has lived [in the UK] for many years" should require or be entitled to an interpreter"