Hitler Hated Communism, Socialist, Homosexuals, and Jews

[Contumacious]

you are one stupid bastard, aren't you? Were you dropped on your head as a child or something?[/QUOTE]

Apparently you must have been.....you can't even figure out what happened to the Jews in Austria and Germany prior to 1939.

Try again.

He never said that they weren't persecuted. He said how much was known [outside of Germany and Austria] prior to the invasion of Poland.

And the answer still remains, not much, at least not to the extent to which it what actually happening. Kristallnacht happened in November of '38. The 900 fled in May of '39. 6 months later. Considering the restrictions on non-official communication and the clampdown the Nazi's had on propaganda, this was barely enough time for the higher ups in the allies to even begin to suspect what had happened. Let alone for the US (a neutral country at the time) to deal with a refugee issue of ostensibly German citizens.

Shirley, you jest.

Although it is true that OFFICIALLY the US was Neutral in reality Roosevelt wiped his ass with the statute.

The ************ was involved against the Japanese in Indochina, was selling war ships to Churchill and froze Japan's assets in the US PRIOR to Pearl Harbor.

The only time the bastard relied on the neutrality issue was when he refused to let the Jews disembark in Miami.


.

 

[elvis]

Try again.

He never said that they weren't persecuted. He said how much was known [outside of Germany and Austria] prior to the invasion of Poland.

And the answer still remains, not much, at least not to the extent to which it what actually happening. Kristallnacht happened in November of '38. The 900 fled in May of '39. 6 months later. Considering the restrictions on non-official communication and the clampdown the Nazi's had on propaganda, this was barely enough time for the higher ups in the allies to even begin to suspect what had happened. Let alone for the US (a neutral country at the time) to deal with a refugee issue of ostensibly German citizens.

Shirley, you jest.

Although it is true that OFFICIALLY the US was Neutral in reality Roosevelt wiped his ass with the statute.

The ************ was involved against the Japanese in Indochina, was selling war ships to Churchill and froze Japan's assets in the US PRIOR to Pearl Harbor.

The only time the bastard relied on the neutrality issue was when he refused to let the Jews disembark in Miami.


.

You are correct about neutrality or lack thereof. But he's not Hitler.

 

[Contumacious]

Shirley, you jest.

Although it is true that OFFICIALLY the US was Neutral in reality Roosevelt wiped his ass with the statute.

The ************ was involved against the Japanese in Indochina, was selling war ships to Churchill and froze Japan's assets in the US PRIOR to Pearl Harbor.

The only time the bastard relied on the neutrality issue was when he refused to let the Jews disembark in Miami.


.

You are correct about neutrality or lack thereof. But he's not Hitler.

Well, BOTH Mussolini and Adolf thought highly of him ....birds of a feather.....


.

 

[elvis]

You are correct about neutrality or lack thereof. But he's not Hitler.

Well, BOTH Mussolini and Adolf thought highly of him ....birds of a feather.....


.

That doesn't work.

 

[RadiomanATL]

Try again.

He never said that they weren't persecuted. He said how much was known [outside of Germany and Austria] prior to the invasion of Poland.

And the answer still remains, not much, at least not to the extent to which it what actually happening. Kristallnacht happened in November of '38. The 900 fled in May of '39. 6 months later. Considering the restrictions on non-official communication and the clampdown the Nazi's had on propaganda, this was barely enough time for the higher ups in the allies to even begin to suspect what had happened. Let alone for the US (a neutral country at the time) to deal with a refugee issue of ostensibly German citizens.

Shirley, you jest.

Although it is true that OFFICIALLY the US was Neutral in reality Roosevelt wiped his ass with the statute.

The ************ was involved against the Japanese in Indochina, was selling war ships to Churchill and froze Japan's assets in the US PRIOR to Pearl Harbor.

The only time the bastard relied on the neutrality issue was when he refused to let the Jews disembark in Miami.


.

Your ignorance of history is noted. Carry on making a fool of yourself.

 

[RadiomanATL]

Shirley, you jest.

Although it is true that OFFICIALLY the US was Neutral in reality Roosevelt wiped his ass with the statute.

The ************ was involved against the Japanese in Indochina, was selling war ships to Churchill and froze Japan's assets in the US PRIOR to Pearl Harbor.

The only time the bastard relied on the neutrality issue was when he refused to let the Jews disembark in Miami.


.

You are correct about neutrality or lack thereof. But he's not Hitler.

Roosevelt was trying to backdoor many things in order to prepare the US for war. However, as usual, C misses the most important line in my post. They were German citizens. To ignore this would step the US over a big bad line we were not prepared to cross at that point, and would have helped to suck us in to the war in Europe before we were ready.

 

[L.K.Eder]

"During the first several months of the war in Europe, the American press provided sporadic information about the plight of the Jews in Poland. The Yiddish press and the JTA were among the only sources providing daily accounts of Jewish suffering. Not all of the news was accurate or complete. Fragmentary and exaggerated dispatches made it difficult at times to determine the extent of the devastation. Yet the Contemporary Jewish Record (CJR), a bimonthly publication of the American Jewish Committee, stated in its November/December 1939 issue that "despite the paucity of reliable news from the invaded Polish areas, it is now possible to obtain a fairly accurate but general picture of the fate suffered by Polish Jewry during the first two months of the war." (1)

First reports from Poland told of Nazi air raids on Polish cities where the Jewish sections were intentionally targeted. Mendel Mozes, chief of the Warsaw Bureau of the JTA, visited a number of these areas and found that many Jews had been killed and wounded with extensive damage to Jewish institutions. His eyewitness account of the destruction was broadcast throughout the United States. (2)"

What did they know? American Jews and the Shoah

And this is interesting...apparently the NYT hasn't changed much:

"The (ny) Times generally relegated the news concerning Jews to the inside or back pages of the paper."

What month did the war start again?

almost exactly 70 years ago.

 

[Contumacious]

You are correct about neutrality or lack thereof. But he's not Hitler.

Roosevelt was trying to backdoor many things in order to prepare the US for war. However, as usual, C misses the most important line in my post. They were German citizens. To ignore this would step the US over a big bad line we were not prepared to cross at that point, and would have helped to suck us in to the war in Europe before we were ready.

Jewish refugees aboard the SS Quanza arrive in Norfolk, Va., on Sept. 11, 1940, in this photo from the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum released Friday by Indiana University Press. The photo appears in the new book Refugees and Rescue

Jews and Immigration

A few days after the elections came Kristallnacht in Germany. Roosevelt spoke out publicly, expressing his dismay and horror. He sent a protest to Germany and brought his ambassador to Germany home for consultations. The American Legion endorsed Roosevelt's statement, as did the CIO labor organization. Prominent movie stars -- Fred Astaire, Claudette Colbert and Bette Davis -- spoke out against the brutalities, Bette Davis suggesting that the U.S. sever all economic ties with Hitler's Germany. Support among U.S. citizens for the appeasement policy of Britain's prime minister, Chamberlain, diminished. In a Gallup poll that month, 94 percent expressed disapproval of "Nazi treatment of Jews.

For Hitler, the case of the S.S. St. Louis marked a stunning victory. It proved that, in spite of the protestations of the Allied leaders to the contrary, they didn’t want Jews in their countries any more than he wanted them in his. In fact, when a Canadian official was asked how many Jews fleeing from Nazi Europe could be admitted to Canada, he responded: “None is too many.” This eventually became the title of a book, describing Canada’s draconian refugee policies.

 

[rdean]

Hitler Hated Communism, Socialist, Homosexuals, and Jews

Come on Republcians. Be honest. You don't share these views? Seriously?

 

[jillian]

Hitler Hated Communism, Socialist, Homosexuals, and Jews

Come on Republcians. Be honest. You don't share these views? Seriously?

ummm.... but for the most extreme right winger stormfront types, and the ron paul types.... repubs are actually better on some jewish issues.

the problem is the social issues.... and the whole southern strategy thing. that alienates everyone who isn't white, christian and mostly male.

but no... there isn't as much anti semitism on the right as there is in the far reaches of the left. They just think Jews need to be... how did Coultergeist say it.. oh yeah... perfected.

 

[Contumacious]

hitler hated communism, socialist, homosexuals, and jews

come on republcians. Be honest. You don't share these views? Seriously?

ummm.... But for the most extreme right winger stormfront types, and the ron paul types.... Repubs are actually better on some jewish issues.

:

huh?

 

[Polk]

Hitler Hated Communism, Socialist, Homosexuals, and Jews

Come on Republcians. Be honest. You don't share these views? Seriously?

ummm.... but for the most extreme right winger stormfront types, and the ron paul types.... repubs are actually better on some jewish issues.

the problem is the social issues.... and the whole southern strategy thing. that alienates everyone who isn't white, christian and mostly male.

but no... there isn't as much anti semitism on the right as there is in the far reaches of the left. They just think Jews need to be... how did Coultergeist say it.. oh yeah... perfected.

The John Birch Society is mainstream right and has a long history of antisemitism.
Also, I'd question the value of any "support" when they're supporting me going somewhere to get blown up.

 

[AllieBaba]

We are the party of abolition, remember. We've no problem with Jews.

 

[jillian]

The John Birch Society is mainstream right and has a long history of antisemitism.
Also, I'd question the value of any "support" when they're supporting me going somewhere to get blown up.

john birchers are not mainstream.

and if you're referring to Iraq, that was actually against Israeli interests It was more in Israel's interest for there to be a power balancing Iran's....

But your response is EXACTLY the type of thing I was talking about.

 

[jillian]

hitler hated communism, socialist, homosexuals, and jews

come on republcians. Be honest. You don't share these views? Seriously?

ummm.... But for the most extreme right winger stormfront types, and the ron paul types.... Repubs are actually better on some jewish issues.

:

huh?

huh what?

ron paul types aren't mainstream repub and stormfronters aren't.

what is causing you confusion?

 

[paperview]

We are the party of abolition, remember. We've no problem with Jews.

Of course the party doesn't. Now.

Israel is God's landing strip.

 

[Yukon]

Israel belongs to the Palistinian people and they will never allow the hook-noses to keep the land.

 

[jillian]

We are the party of abolition, remember. We've no problem with Jews.

Of course the party doesn't. Now.

Israel is God's landing strip.

do you think she actually believes that the repubican party would be in favor of abolition if it came up today?

RAFLMAO!

 

[paperview]

We are the party of abolition, remember. We've no problem with Jews.

Of course the party doesn't. Now.

Israel is God's landing strip.

do you think she actually believes that the repubican party would be in favor of abolition if it came up today?

RAFLMAO!

I'll take "short letters that end in O' for $200 on that one.

 

[Polk]

Of course the party doesn't. Now.

Israel is God's landing strip.

do you think she actually believes that the repubican party would be in favor of abolition if it came up today?

RAFLMAO!

I'll take "short letters that end in O' for $200 on that one.

"The central question that emerges . . . is whether the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not prevail numerically? The sobering answer is Yes – the White community is so entitled because, for the time being, it is the advanced race. It is not easy, and it is unpleasant, to adduce statistics evidencing the cultural superiority of White over Negro: but it is a fact that obtrudes, one that cannot be hidden by ever-so-busy egalitarians and anthropologists.


[...]

National Review believes that the South's premises are correct. It is more important for the community, anywhere in the world, to affirm and live by civilized standards, than to bow to the demands of the numerical majority. Sometimes it becomes impossible to assert the will of a minority, in which case it must give way, and the society will regress; sometimes the numerical minority cannot prevail except by violence: then it must determine whether the prevalence of its will is worth the terrible price of violence."

- William F. Buckley