The truth has always failed the Right Wing. Unfortunately for them, facts have a liberal bias.
If you were on "my side" of a debate - I would pay you to not say a word.
Truth is - you are so drunk on Kool-Aid that I guarantee no matter how many times you read your opening post - you won't realize that your making the opposite point.
Do the Math....how much did Boooosh spend in 8 years...and how much has Obama spent in 30 months?
Oops.
What so many of you miss is the fact that because revenues are so low, it seems like we are spending much more than we should be. The fact is that we are overspending, but the bigger fact is that we are completely underfunded. Today we are spending 5% more of GDP than we did in 2000. However, revenues are also short 5% of GDP compared to 2000. In real dollars, that is a $1 trillion shortage in revenue and it is $700 billion in excess spending. $300 billion of that excess spending is on military which is now 6% of GDP versus 4% in 2000. That means non-discretionary spending is only up $400 billion and that is mostly due to the economy sucking so bad that we are supporting more through the safety net.
I'm curious how many people actually remember the reason behind the Bush tax cuts. They weren't put in place to jump start the economy. The economy was fine when Bush took office. The reason for the tax cuts was that we were projecting large surpluses down the road, and it was felt that those surpluses should be put back into the hands of those who pay taxes, but it was done with a provision that should revenues fall, the Bush tax cuts would not be extended. Well, somewhere along the way, as revenues fell, some people decided that it was a smart thing to keep the Bush tax cuts in place even though revenues were tanking.
Plain and simple, we have a revenue problem much more than we have a spending problem, and when the majority of voters figure this out, they are going to demand a change on the revenue side.