Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What You Never Hear Will Always Hurt YouSomething happened in the Truman administration. Did the socialist democrats finally take over while Ike was poised to take Berlin? At any rate Eisenhower's forces were ordered (by Marshall?) to wait for the Russian hoard to take the city. Who gave the order? Churchill wasn't crazy about it so why did the Americans give away Poland and East Germany and create the Iron Curtain when they didn't have to? Truman wasn't the brightest bulb on the marquee and he relied on FDR's (faulty) policies including his friendship with Stalin.
What’s that have to do with the motives between America and Communists?Evolved Asians Weren't Consigned to a No Man's Land
South Vietnam is a toxic jungle inhabited by useless, gutless, and corrupt people.
Despite the Netrix's "Off-Topic" Nonsense, a Thread Is Not a TightropeWhat’s that have to do with the motives between America and Communists?
Of course D-Day was all about bringing Germany to its knees. Just as Vietnam was about being the Nova to its knees. We just had a crappy Democrat POTUS in the 60’s that prevented it.Despite the Netrix's "Off-Topic" Nonsense, a Thread Is Not a Tightrope
Communists pick lowlife to get them in power and then betray them, which they deserve when they are lowlife and not the working class that the Old Left tried to use and abuse. In Vietnam, by taking on the lowlife South Vietnamese as allies, our race-confused ruling class saddled us working-class warriors with an impossible obstruction to victory.
In 1944, D-Day wasn't about liberating decadent and gutless France; that NPC entity was bypassed and ignored. The total focus was on crossing the Rhine and destroying Germany. Because American leaders had a more realistic attitude back then (and even in Korea, where the native soldiers were kept out of the action and the civilians were treated as obstructions), they won (Korea was a sure victory that Truman bungled). The only reason we lost in Vietnam was that we didn't use South Vietnam and its useless people merely as stepping stones to invade and destroy North Vietnam.
South Vietnam no longer exists, jackass!Evolved Asians Weren't Consigned to a No Man's Land
South Vietnam is a toxic jungle inhabited by useless, gutless, and corrupt people.
What You Never Hear Will Always Hurt You
Truman, a hack small-town politician, was under orders from the military-industrial complex and the Statist fear-mongers to let the Soviet Union become a credible threat. That's also why he wouldn't let MacArthur cripple Chinese communism and liberate North Korea.
The heiristocracy, which hates and fears all other White people, also ordered dirty Harry to initiate the Civil Rights for the Uncivilized movement.
Good night, all.It recently struck me that the current Russian incursion into the Ukraine has several historical parallels with the German attack on Poland in 1939.
1. Both Russia and Germany were faced with important parts of their territories (Sevastapol/Crimea and Danzig/Prussia) having become geographically separated from the rest of their countries. Both tried to negotiate with the newly recreated intervening countries (Ukraine and Poland) to reestablish physical links to these territories.
2. Outside Powers (U.S. and Great Britain) interfered with these negotiations by falsely assuring the intervening countries that they would be protected if they refused to negotiate. After attempts at negotiation failed, both Russia and Germany seized areas of these intervening countries in order to reestablish physical links with their severed territories.
3. After these incursions took place, Outside Powers officially declared their opposition but were not able to undertake any actions to repel the incursions. In the case of Poland, Great Britain's weak political leadership had already emboldened Germany to the extent that a second world war became inevitable.
4. In the case of the Ukraine, America's weak leadership has emboldened Russia in the same way. The American government has reduced itself to the position of a broadcaster at a sporting event; describing the action but having no control over the outcome.
Actually it goes back to Germany taking the Rhineland two years prior and Hitler being emboldened by the Allies non response.
Ever been to Iraq or Vietnam?
If you want to live under a totalitarian communist state rather than a Democracy, why aren’t you living under one like you think those people should?
Tell me how Vietnam was any different than France 1944.
I'll test whether or not you can demonstrate some sincerity, even though I'm pretty sure it's a waste of my time.
Authoritarian governments can work better for the good of the people, than a capitalist government that is corrupted by big business and no longer serves the interests of the people. I suggest a polite discussion on China's success.
If that turns out to be wasting words on you, then perhaps some others will read and have their interest stirred up?
What’s that have to do with the motives between America and Communists?
If Ukraine is to survive the current Russian invasion in any reasonable form, it should form an economic and military union with Poland.
Based on your recent utterly ignorant and rubbish posts, I am not sure you are worth any kind of a reply. But okay, whatever.Just what the world needs, the restoration of the old evil and corrupt Polish dynasty?
Obviously Kyiv is totally corrupt, and likely should be utterly destroyed and something new started over.
What has to be undone is the US corruption and takeover of Kyiv since 2014.
I think that it would vary from country to country. The US has become considerably more authoritarian since the beginning of the Trump regime and probably hasn't declined during the Biden regime. IMO.I would suggest that capitalist governments are always the MOST authoritarian, since those with a monopoly on capital have total control of media, propaganda, police, troops, etc.
The US And several other Asian countries fought in Vietnam AT THE REQUEST of the Republic of Vietnam under the terms of the SEATO alliance. While it may not have been the best fought war the USA ever was involved in, the US involvement was legal and moral. South Vietnam was being invaded from another country which was also funding and supporting an insurgence in not only the Republic of Vietnam, but Cambodia, Laos and Thailand as well.Was America's Iraq wars and the Vietnam war any more justifiable than Hitlers'?
You answer me that without crossing your flippers behind your back and then I'll tell you why Putin's war is much more justifiable.
That may be a little too simplistic. Prior to WW2, Hitler's "invasions" were primarily the recovery of territory unjustly taken from Germany by the Treaty of Versailles. Even the western portion of Poland had been German territory. The flash point of the war was caused by Britain's reactive assurances of support to Poland to save face from PM Chamberlain's embarrassing diplomatic blunders. These assurances led Polish leaders to take an intransigent attitude towards Germany's demands for a land bridge to its detached territory in East Prussia. When Poland was invaded, its was Britain who declared war on Germany, and not vice versa.Hitler, on the other hand, invaded his neighbors in violation of international law and without cause.
The connection I draw is to the USSR and Finland in the Winter War. A Russian-speaking empire based in Moscow invades a smaller neighbor with the intent to gobble up land. A combination of Soviet/Russian blunders and a surprisingly robust defense leaves Russia having a much harder time of it than they expected.It recently struck me that the current Russian incursion into the Ukraine has several historical parallels with the German attack on Poland in 1939.
1. Both Russia and Germany were faced with important parts of their territories (Sevastapol/Crimea and Danzig/Prussia) having become geographically separated from the rest of their countries. Both tried to negotiate with the newly recreated intervening countries (Ukraine and Poland) to reestablish physical links to these territories.
2. Outside Powers (U.S. and Great Britain) interfered with these negotiations by falsely assuring the intervening countries that they would be protected if they refused to negotiate. After attempts at negotiation failed, both Russia and Germany seized areas of these intervening countries in order to reestablish physical links with their severed territories.
3. After these incursions took place, Outside Powers officially declared their opposition but were not able to undertake any actions to repel the incursions. In the case of Poland, Great Britain's weak political leadership had already emboldened Germany to the extent that a second world war became inevitable.
4. In the case of the Ukraine, America's weak leadership has emboldened Russia in the same way. The American government has reduced itself to the position of a broadcaster at a sporting event; describing the action but having no control over the outcome.
