Hispanic Federal Judge Repeals TX Voter Photo ID Law. Compares it to slavery!!

ShootSpeeders

Gold Member
May 13, 2012
20,232
2,363
280
Texas needs to ignore this ruling. Insist that federal judges show where the constitution gives them authority to repeal state laws.

Latina Judge Strikes Down TX Voter ID Blasts History of Discrimination - NBC News

oct 10 2014
A Texas-born and raised Latina federal judge, Nelva Gonzalez Ramos, did not just block a Republican-sponsored state voter ID law, she equated it to laws enacted by states after slavery was abolished to ensure blacks could not vote.

"The Court holds that SB 14 creates an unconstitutional burden on the right to vote, has an impermissible discriminatory effect against Hispanics and African-Americans, and was imposed with an unconstitutional discriminatory purpose," Gonzalez Ramos stated in her lengthy ruling issued Thursday. "The Court further holds that SB 14 constitutes an unconstitutional poll tax."

Texas' strict voter ID law, passed by the Republican-led Legislature in 2011, only accepts certain forms of photo ID and does not allow other commonly used ones. It does not allow college student photo IDs, for example, but allows gun permits as identification.

The law would have made it extremely difficult for Texas Latinos such as 18-year-old twins Nicole and Victoria Rodriguez to vote, as groups argued in 2013. The young women at the time did not have driver's licenses since their parents could not afford car insurance, yet they had valid Texas birth certificates, high school IDs and Social Security identification. Still, they would not have been allowed to vote unless they traveled to a state office to get a special photo ID issued by the Department of Public Safety. Voting experts have pointed out the long distances and restricted hours of these state offices, which make obtaining the ID difficult for lower-income residents without cars as well as older voters.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
This judge needs to be investigated for taking bribes from the mexican govt.
 
This is how you know Voter Fraud is the lifeblood of the Dem Party. Without the ability to manufacture votes they'd disappear as a national party
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
The Court holds that SB 14 creates an unconstitutional burden on the right to vote, has an impermissible discriminatory effect against Hispanics and African-Americans, and was imposed with an unconstitutional discriminatory purpose,"

Sounds like affirmative action programs. Those are DESIGNED to hurt whites and help non-whites. Why do the courts let them stand?
 
This judge needs to be investigated for taking bribes from the mexican govt.

And from the special interest group, "La Raza" (The Race). Activist Federal Judges are systematically destroying the Constitution and States' Rights one ruling at a time. Congress needs to curb this Draconian dictatorship.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
This is how you know Voter Fraud is the lifeblood of the Dem Party. Without the ability to manufacture votes they'd disappear as a national party

Millions of illegals voted for obozo in 2012. How do we know that? Cause obozo won't enforce the law. Law says illegals can't live here or work here either but O lets them do both!!! He lets illegals collect welfare too.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #7
This judge needs to be investigated for taking bribes from the mexican govt.

And from the special interest group, "La Raza" (The Race). Activist Federal Judges are systematically destroying the Constitution and States' Rights one ruling at a time. Congress needs to curb this Draconian dictatorship.

Congress?? You expect federal congresmen to stand up for states rights? Not a chance. The states need to stand up for states rights. The federal constitution is on their side.
 
The idiots hear a dog whistle and come running.

Why don't you cookie-cutter-fools save yourselves some time and just type "ditto" cuz all your posts have the same professional-victim stink to them.

:poop:
 
This guy is siding with his people. He intends to fight for a hispanic country or countries.

The judge is female but anyway - yes he is taking the side of mexico and against america. Mexico wants illegals voting in america.
 
Texas needs to ignore this ruling. Insist that federal judges show where the constitution gives them authority to repeal state laws.

Latina Judge Strikes Down TX Voter ID Blasts History of Discrimination - NBC News

oct 10 2014
A Texas-born and raised Latina federal judge, Nelva Gonzalez Ramos, did not just block a Republican-sponsored state voter ID law, she equated it to laws enacted by states after slavery was abolished to ensure blacks could not vote.

"The Court holds that SB 14 creates an unconstitutional burden on the right to vote, has an impermissible discriminatory effect against Hispanics and African-Americans, and was imposed with an unconstitutional discriminatory purpose," Gonzalez Ramos stated in her lengthy ruling issued Thursday. "The Court further holds that SB 14 constitutes an unconstitutional poll tax."

Texas' strict voter ID law, passed by the Republican-led Legislature in 2011, only accepts certain forms of photo ID and does not allow other commonly used ones. It does not allow college student photo IDs, for example, but allows gun permits as identification.

The law would have made it extremely difficult for Texas Latinos such as 18-year-old twins Nicole and Victoria Rodriguez to vote, as groups argued in 2013. The young women at the time did not have driver's licenses since their parents could not afford car insurance, yet they had valid Texas birth certificates, high school IDs and Social Security identification. Still, they would not have been allowed to vote unless they traveled to a state office to get a special photo ID issued by the Department of Public Safety. Voting experts have pointed out the long distances and restricted hours of these state offices, which make obtaining the ID difficult for lower-income residents without cars as well as older voters.


Good decision. There are plenty of ways to identify a person besides photo IDs.
 
I am sorry, what does her being Hispanic have anything to do with the ruling? Should she not be allowed to hear the case because she is Hispanic?
 

Forum List

Back
Top