Hillary's New Economy TV Ad Is a JOKE

protectionist

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2013
56,454
18,052
2,250
It starts by
1.) asking >>
"How do we make the economy work for everyone ?" Then it purports to answer that question by saying >> "By making big corporations and those at the top finally pay their fair share in taxes"

Is that so ? Well there's bit of problem there. You see, those same "big corporations and those at the top" are exactly the same ones who are right now breaking records in spending over $200 Million FINANCING HILLARY'S CAMPAIGN. So we are supposed to believe that the same ones who are shelling out massive amounts of cas$$$$h trying to put her in the White House, are doing it so she can raise their taxes ? I suppose a FEW Americans could be dumb enough to believe that (but not many).

Then, 2.) it says >> "and those companies that move overseas, she'll charge them an exit tax". TWO problems with this one. First, again, she's trying to have you believe that she will charge exit taxes on the same "big corporations" that are FINANCING HER CAMPAIGN. She's really assuming we're pretty stupid.
Secondly, big corporations moving overseas is a problem that has pretty much already run its course. What was the American manufacturing sector is generally already gone from America, and already overseas. Not sure about that ? Take a walk through WalMart, and casually pick up 100 items off the shelves, and look at the labels. Tell me how many you see that say "Made in USA" and how many say "Made in China" (or some other country) ? You'll be lucky if you come up with 10 that are Made in USA.
So, Hillary's grandiose "exit tax" is a ruse to make you think she's against international outsourcing. What a joke. Hillary is outsourcer # 1 in America, a pure GLOBALIST. She just about invented NAFTA, CAFTA, is member of the Trilateral Commission and Council on Foreign Relations, all outsourcing organizations, and until this ELECTION YEAR, she backed Obama's TPP (Trans Pacific partnership) outsourcing scheme 100%.
On top of all that, her pro-immigration policies, which support both legal & illegal immigration, are nothing less than DOMESTIC OUTSOURCING, with cheap-labor, foreign workers replacing American workers.

In contrast, the REAL remedy for international outsourcing is to lower the corporate tax (the high level of which drove these companies out in the first place), but it is Donald Trump who is proposing that, not Hillary. In fact, she's proposing to RAISE the corporate tax, which could drive the few manufacturing companies we have left, to leave. And another remedy is to place tariffs on the overseas companies' products when they reach our shores. But once again, it is Donald Trump who is proposing that, not Hillary.

This brings us to # 3 in Hillary's illustrious new economy ad.

It goes on to say >> "Then she'll use that money (which doesn't exist) to make the largest investment in creating good-paying jobs since World War II. Millions of jobs."

First of all, "that money" they allude to, won't exist, because the companies have already left, so if any exit taxes were paid, it would be by a tiny number of departing companies, and those taxes would be a drop in the bucket. Secondly, for Hillary to talk about creating jobs is the height of deceit and absurdity. Hillary's polices are pure globalism. With international outsourcing, she's FOR it, not against it, and her record, going back to the the early 90s with NAFTA, proves it. One would have to be awfully naive to believe that after 25 years of consistent outsourcing support (international & domestic), she is suddenly going to oppose it (just in time for the 2016 ELECTION).

Hillary's globalist policies have resulted in massive job LOSS, and her domestic outsourcing (AKA immigration & visas) have resulted in millions more jobs that Americans have lost. This is a woman who, looking at a map of the world, does not see any national border lines. She is just as happy with Mexicans, Chinese, Indians, Filipinos, Nigerians, et al taking US jobs, as with Americans having them.
 
Hillary just announced she will spend another $80 Million on ads just in the swing states. If nothing else, this election is costing the Democrat special interest groups more money than any election in history. What's it going to cost the American people by way of political favors to have these donors see a profit on their investments? You can bet your sweet bunns that George Soros, Wall Street, Saudi Arabia, and all Hillary's donors expect a return for their dollars. Hold on to your butts. Hillary is owned big time. Well, at lest it is a boon to the television advertising industry. It also indicated a fear in the Clinton camp. She and her big donors are trying to buy the election.
 
Hillary just announced she will spend another $80 Million on ads just in the swing states. If nothing else, this election is costing the Democrat special interest groups more money than any election in history. What's it going to cost the American people by way of political favors to have these donors see a profit on their investments? You can bet your sweet bunns that George Soros, Wall Street, Saudi Arabia, and all Hillary's donors expect a return for their dollars. Hold on to your butts. Hillary is owned big time. Well, at lest it is a boon to the television advertising industry. It also indicated a fear in the Clinton camp. She and her big donors are trying to buy the election.
So far it's more like an AUCTION, than an election. (with Hillary's Wall St boys doing all the bidding)
 
Hillary just announced she will spend another $80 Million on ads just in the swing states. If nothing else, this election is costing the Democrat special interest groups more money than any election in history. What's it going to cost the American people by way of political favors to have these donors see a profit on their investments? You can bet your sweet bunns that George Soros, Wall Street, Saudi Arabia, and all Hillary's donors expect a return for their dollars. Hold on to your butts. Hillary is owned big time. Well, at lest it is a boon to the television advertising industry. It also indicated a fear in the Clinton camp. She and her big donors are trying to buy the election.
So far it's more like an AUCTION, than an election. (with Hillary's Wall St boys doing all the bidding)

Yes, we should have simply sold her the Presidency for about $2 Billion dollars.
 
Her voters don't care what she says or does. They are stupid that way.
 

Forum List

Back
Top