Luddly Neddite
Diamond Member
- Sep 14, 2011
- 63,975
- 9,997
- 2,040
The candidates will be Bush and Clinton. The country prospered under another Clinton and damn near went broke under previous Bushes. No contest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In sum you dont know what the **** you're talking about.The history of presidential elections in this country are pretty consistent. The younger upbeat fresh-faced/fresh ideas candidate beats out the older establishment candidate.
Jimmy Carter beat Ford
Reagan beat Carter
GHW Bush won but mostly on Reagan's coattails.
Clinton was the young upstart with the cool saxophone so he won
GW Bush was the outsider from Texas against the insider dour Gore
Obama the fresh audacious guy from outside beat McCain, the crabby old guy
Obama won a second time mainly due to vote suppression and fraud.
So this time it's Hillary, in public life for over 25 years with no ideas and a history of scandal wider than her tuchas vs whoever the GOP picks. And virtually all the GOP candidates are fresh, young faces with new ideas and enthusiasm.
It wont be a contest.
Reagan (1911) was older than Carter (1924).
GW Bush (1946) is older than Gore (1948).
HW Bush (1924) is older than Dukakis (1933).
In sum, you're full of crap.
Was there some remote resemblence to anything I wrote? Or are you just out of things to say?History is your paradigm for this argument?The history of presidential elections in this country are pretty consistent. The younger upbeat fresh-faced/fresh ideas candidate beats out the older establishment candidate.
Jimmy Carter beat Ford
Reagan beat Carter
GHW Bush won but mostly on Reagan's coattails.
Clinton was the young upstart with the cool saxophone so he won
GW Bush was the outsider from Texas against the insider dour Gore
Obama the fresh audacious guy from outside beat McCain, the crabby old guy
Obama won a second time mainly due to vote suppression and fraud.
So this time it's Hillary, in public life for over 25 years with no ideas and a history of scandal wider than her tuchas vs whoever the GOP picks. And virtually all the GOP candidates are fresh, young faces with new ideas and enthusiasm.
It wont be a contest.
Dewey Beats Truman
Now there was a headline!
Roosevelt elected to Fourth term
Eisenhower beats Stevenson to win Second Term
Boy! They sure knew how to write headlines!
Let history be your guide.
Hmm. No one is an enthusiastic Jeb Bush supporter. The country suffered scandal after scandal with Clinton. Jeb Bush is not George Bush.The candidates will be Bush and Clinton. The country prospered under another Clinton and damn near went broke under previous Bushes. No contest.
Please post your past predictions and how they turned out.I didn't think Hillary could win... until The Rabbi said she was toast. He has NEVER been right about a single prediction.
Rick Perry 2012?
Rubio announces today.The history of presidential elections in this country are pretty consistent. The younger upbeat fresh-faced/fresh ideas candidate beats out the older establishment candidate.
Jimmy Carter beat Ford
Reagan beat Carter
GHW Bush won but mostly on Reagan's coattails.
Clinton was the young upstart with the cool saxophone so he won
GW Bush was the outsider from Texas against the insider dour Gore
Obama the fresh audacious guy from outside beat McCain, the crabby old guy
Obama won a second time mainly due to vote suppression and fraud.
So this time it's Hillary, in public life for over 25 years with no ideas and a history of scandal wider than her tuchas vs whoever the GOP picks. And virtually all the GOP candidates are fresh, young faces with new ideas and enthusiasm.
It wont be a contest.
You did write something about voter suppression and fraud, but I decline to comment on paranoia. Other than that, you cited what you see as historical precedent. Younger, fresher faces defeating the older established faces. I just wonder how much history you can cite? What I wrote basically torpedoes your premise.Was there some remote resemblence to anything I wrote? Or are you just out of things to say?History is your paradigm for this argument?The history of presidential elections in this country are pretty consistent. The younger upbeat fresh-faced/fresh ideas candidate beats out the older establishment candidate.
Jimmy Carter beat Ford
Reagan beat Carter
GHW Bush won but mostly on Reagan's coattails.
Clinton was the young upstart with the cool saxophone so he won
GW Bush was the outsider from Texas against the insider dour Gore
Obama the fresh audacious guy from outside beat McCain, the crabby old guy
Obama won a second time mainly due to vote suppression and fraud.
So this time it's Hillary, in public life for over 25 years with no ideas and a history of scandal wider than her tuchas vs whoever the GOP picks. And virtually all the GOP candidates are fresh, young faces with new ideas and enthusiasm.
It wont be a contest.
Dewey Beats Truman
Now there was a headline!
Roosevelt elected to Fourth term
Eisenhower beats Stevenson to win Second Term
Boy! They sure knew how to write headlines!
Let history be your guide.
It actually demonstrates you have nothing and know nothing. You have to go back about 60 years to find something contrary.You did write something about voter suppression and fraud, but I decline to comment on paranoia. Other than that, you cited what you see as historical precedent. Younger, fresher faces defeating the older established faces. I just wonder how much history you can cite? What I wrote basically torpedoes your premise.Was there some remote resemblence to anything I wrote? Or are you just out of things to say?History is your paradigm for this argument?The history of presidential elections in this country are pretty consistent. The younger upbeat fresh-faced/fresh ideas candidate beats out the older establishment candidate.
Jimmy Carter beat Ford
Reagan beat Carter
GHW Bush won but mostly on Reagan's coattails.
Clinton was the young upstart with the cool saxophone so he won
GW Bush was the outsider from Texas against the insider dour Gore
Obama the fresh audacious guy from outside beat McCain, the crabby old guy
Obama won a second time mainly due to vote suppression and fraud.
So this time it's Hillary, in public life for over 25 years with no ideas and a history of scandal wider than her tuchas vs whoever the GOP picks. And virtually all the GOP candidates are fresh, young faces with new ideas and enthusiasm.
It wont be a contest.
Dewey Beats Truman
Now there was a headline!
Roosevelt elected to Fourth term
Eisenhower beats Stevenson to win Second Term
Boy! They sure knew how to write headlines!
Let history be your guide.
A republican accusing someone of having no ideas?!![]()
I didnt know Hillary was going to make her masterful performance in Benghazi a campaign issue.A republican accusing someone of having no ideas?!![]()
![]()
Anything within my own lifespan is relevant. Anything before that is history. Shall I go on?It actually demonstrates you have nothing and know nothing. You have to go back about 60 years to find something contrary.You did write something about voter suppression and fraud, but I decline to comment on paranoia. Other than that, you cited what you see as historical precedent. Younger, fresher faces defeating the older established faces. I just wonder how much history you can cite? What I wrote basically torpedoes your premise.Was there some remote resemblence to anything I wrote? Or are you just out of things to say?History is your paradigm for this argument?The history of presidential elections in this country are pretty consistent. The younger upbeat fresh-faced/fresh ideas candidate beats out the older establishment candidate.
Jimmy Carter beat Ford
Reagan beat Carter
GHW Bush won but mostly on Reagan's coattails.
Clinton was the young upstart with the cool saxophone so he won
GW Bush was the outsider from Texas against the insider dour Gore
Obama the fresh audacious guy from outside beat McCain, the crabby old guy
Obama won a second time mainly due to vote suppression and fraud.
So this time it's Hillary, in public life for over 25 years with no ideas and a history of scandal wider than her tuchas vs whoever the GOP picks. And virtually all the GOP candidates are fresh, young faces with new ideas and enthusiasm.
It wont be a contest.
Dewey Beats Truman
Now there was a headline!
Roosevelt elected to Fourth term
Eisenhower beats Stevenson to win Second Term
Boy! They sure knew how to write headlines!
Let history be your guide.
Were you one of those complaining about that Pizzeria in Indiana getting social media death threats?No. Go kill yourself. Stick your head ina toilet and flush until it all goes black. You have zero to contribute to any thread. You post deflection, spin, insult, and irrelevance. Go kill yourself.Anything within my own lifespan is relevant. Anything before that is history. Shall I go on?It actually demonstrates you have nothing and know nothing. You have to go back about 60 years to find something contrary.You did write something about voter suppression and fraud, but I decline to comment on paranoia. Other than that, you cited what you see as historical precedent. Younger, fresher faces defeating the older established faces. I just wonder how much history you can cite? What I wrote basically torpedoes your premise.Was there some remote resemblence to anything I wrote? Or are you just out of things to say?History is your paradigm for this argument?
Dewey Beats Truman
Now there was a headline!
Roosevelt elected to Fourth term
Eisenhower beats Stevenson to win Second Term
Boy! They sure knew how to write headlines!
Let history be your guide.
No. Why do you ask? Nothing else to respond?Were you one of those complaining about that Pizzeria in Indiana getting social media death threats?No. Go kill yourself. Stick your head ina toilet and flush until it all goes black. You have zero to contribute to any thread. You post deflection, spin, insult, and irrelevance. Go kill yourself.Anything within my own lifespan is relevant. Anything before that is history. Shall I go on?It actually demonstrates you have nothing and know nothing. You have to go back about 60 years to find something contrary.You did write something about voter suppression and fraud, but I decline to comment on paranoia. Other than that, you cited what you see as historical precedent. Younger, fresher faces defeating the older established faces. I just wonder how much history you can cite? What I wrote basically torpedoes your premise.Was there some remote resemblence to anything I wrote? Or are you just out of things to say?
I was into soccer and basketball myself. I have a brain.Oh...Cheerleader.![]()
You wouldn't understand, it's something athletic, pretty girls do
Hell of a nice guy too.Rubio is going to steal the hispanic and women voters....he'll be the next president.![]()
I think he'll be the VP candidate
Nice family -- Wife's a former Dolphins Cheerleader
![]()
So far there isn't a loon on this board who has offered up an accomplishment by the Hildabeast, not one
So far there isn't a loon on this board who has offered up an accomplishment by the Hildabeast, not one
not one?? woweee
well then, of course that must mean..gasp! Hillary hasn't accomplished ANYthing at all !!!
or does it...........?
![]()
1962 April 15 — Goes with church youth group to Chicago to hear Rev. Martin Luther King. Hillary’s minister, Don Jones, takes Hillary and others backstage where she meets Rev. King.
1964 — In the fall goes door-to-door for conservative presidential candidate Barry Goldwater.
1965 — Graduates from Maine South High School in Park Ridge, IL.
1965 — Attends Wellesley College, an all-female college outside of Boston, and majors in political science and psychology. Elected president of the campus Republican Club.
1968 — Hilary watches on television as the Democratic Convention in Chicago disintegrates into chaos when thousands of anti-war protesters are attacked with tear gas and billy clubs. Rev. Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy assassinated. Protests grow against Vietnam War.
1969 May — Graduates from Wellesley College and becomes the first student to address the graduating class at commencement. Her criticism of the “official” speaker, Republican Senator Edward Brooke of Massachusetts, landed an excerpt of her speech and her picture in Life magazine.
1969 — Attends Yale Law School In New Haven, Connecticut.
1970 Spring — Moves into small house with fellow Yale University Law student Bill Clinton.
1970 Summer — Works at Children’s Defense Fund.
1971 Summer — Works on migrant problems for Sen. Walter Mondale subcommittee.
1972 — Works on Sen. George McGovern’s presidential campaign.
1973 May — Receives Juris Doctor degree from Yale Law School, where she served on the editorial board of the Yale Review of Law and Social Action. During her second year, she worked at the Yale Child Study Center.
1974 — Appointed to Staff of House Judiciary Committee during Watergate. Teaches at Univ. of Ark. Law School.
1975 October 11 — Hillary and Bill Clinton are married by Methodist minister Vic Nixon in a house Bill Clinton bought in Fayetteville, Arkansas.
1976 — Joins the Rose Law Firm. Bill Clinton elected Attorney General of Arkansas.
1977 — President Jimmy Carter appoints Hillary to the board of the Legal Services Corporation.
1978 — Appointed to board of the Legal Services Corp. Bill Clinton elected Governor of Arkansas.
1979 — Made full partner of the Rose Law Firm.
1980 February 27 — Daughter Chelsea Victoria born by caesarean at Baptist Medical Center in Little Rock.
1980 — Bill Clinton defeated in re-election bid.
1982 — Bill Clinton again elected Governor.
1983 — Bill Clinton appoints Hillary head of the Arkansas Education Standards Committee.
1991 October 3 — Bill Clinton announces he is running for president.
1992 — While campaigning in Chicago she defends her work for Bill’s presidential campaign by saying, “I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas.”
1992 — Bill Clinton elected president with 43% of the vote.
1993 January 20 — Bill Clinton sworn in and Hillary becomes First Lady.
1993 January 25 — Bill Clinton names Hillary chair of health care task force.
1993 January — The Hillary Clinton Quarterly publishes its first issue. Hillary is the first First Lady to have her own national publication.
1996 January 18 — It Takes a Village: And Other Lessons Our Children Teach Us is published.
2000 — Elected to the U.S. Senate from New York def. Rep. Rick Lazio by 55% to 43%.
2001-2009 — As New York senator sponsored 363 bills between Jan 22, 2001. and Jan 14, 2009 of which 324 did not make it out of committee; 11 were successfully enacted. Hillary co-sponsored 1,530 bills during the same time period.
2002 October 11 — Votes “Yes” on U.S. Senate Iraq War Resolution
2003 June 9 — Living History is published.
2006 November 7 — Re-elected to US Senate from New York.
2009 January 29 — Nominated by Barack Obama to be the 67th U.S. Secretary of State.
Hillary Clinton biographical timeline. - Hillary Clinton Quarterly Hillary Clinton Quarterly