Hillary: Guns Don't Make You Safer

[Weatherman2020]

Find the one person in this picture who is not carrying a gun.

 

[Hossfly]

 

[Pogo]

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

 

[Weatherman2020]

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

You're dumber than a bag of hammers.

 

[jon_berzerk]

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

You're dumber than a bag of hammers.

Well said

 

[Little-Acorn]

So, why do the Democrats so virulently oppose the only method that has actually worked to reduce mass shootings: Letting everybody carry who wants to? Most people still wouldn't bother, of course, but a few would. And the nutcase wanting to shoot up the next school or shopping mall or post office (or French concert hall or California office party of Belgian airport), would know there's a probably a few armed people in the crowd he's about to attack. And he won't know which ones they are, or what direction a bullet might come from. And a number of the recent mass shooters have carefully avoided places where there might be armed people on the premises, choosing so-called "gun free zones" where the liberals' laws are in full effect.

Why do these leftist fanatics keep pushing their failed "solutions" after it has become obvious they don't work, and avoiding the solutions that do work?

 

[Pogo]

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

You're dumber than a bag of hammers.

So ---- you read it TWICE and still didn't get it?

Did I use too-big words?

 

[Weatherman2020]

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

You're dumber than a bag of hammers.

So ---- you read it TWICE and still didn't get it?

Did I use too-big words?

Tell Hillary, she's the one surrounded by 30 guns.

 

[Hossfly]

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

 

[Stephanie]

we should demand her SS be taken away . those guns doesn't keep her safer so why should we pay for guys carrying them?


she is such a slimy snake.

 

[Pogo]

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

You're dumber than a bag of hammers.

So ---- you read it TWICE and still didn't get it?

Did I use too-big words?

Tell Hillary, she's the one surrounded by 30 guns.

My post isn't about "Hillary".

It's about the logic in the OP.

STILL over your head?
I ain't trying to be lofty here Shorty.

 

[Pogo]

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

Non sequitur, Hoss.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Find the one person in this picture who is not carrying a gun.
View attachment 69699

Probably shoot herself accidentally if she did.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[CrusaderFrank]

If it actually does come down to Trump and Hillary, Trump will absolutely shred her on hypocrisy on this issue

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

You're dumber than a bag of hammers.

So ---- you read it TWICE and still didn't get it?

Did I use too-big words?

Where nonsense is, there's nothing to get.

 

[Pogo]

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

You're dumber than a bag of hammers.

So ---- you read it TWICE and still didn't get it?

Did I use too-big words?

Where nonsense is, there's nothing to get.

But there is where logic is.

Look, if you really insist on playing so stupid that you can't comprehend this..... look at the first sentence:

IF "Guns don't kill people; people kill people" --- the person, not the object, is the actor.

THEN: "Guns don't keep people safe; people keep people safe --- SAME THING.

GET IT YET HUNIOR? YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.

Fucking retard.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

So, why do the Democrats so virulently oppose the only method that has actually worked to reduce mass shootings: Letting everybody carry who wants to? Most people still wouldn't bother, of course, but a few would. And the nutcase wanting to shoot up the next school or shopping mall or post office (or French concert hall or California office party of Belgian airport), would know there's a probably a few armed people in the crowd he's about to attack. And he won't know which ones they are, or what direction a bullet might come from. And a number of the recent mass shooters have carefully avoided places where there might be armed people on the premises, choosing so-called "gun free zones" where the liberals' laws are in full effect.

Why do these leftist fanatics keep pushing their failed "solutions" after it has become obvious they don't work, and avoiding the solutions that do work?

For the same reason Mao and Stalin opposed private gun ownership.

 

[jon_berzerk]

So, why do the Democrats so virulently oppose the only method that has actually worked to reduce mass shootings: Letting everybody carry who wants to? Most people still wouldn't bother, of course, but a few would. And the nutcase wanting to shoot up the next school or shopping mall or post office (or French concert hall or California office party of Belgian airport), would know there's a probably a few armed people in the crowd he's about to attack. And he won't know which ones they are, or what direction a bullet might come from. And a number of the recent mass shooters have carefully avoided places where there might be armed people on the premises, choosing so-called "gun free zones" where the liberals' laws are in full effect.

Why do these leftist fanatics keep pushing their failed "solutions" after it has become obvious they don't work, and avoiding the solutions that do work?

For the same reason Mao and Stalin opposed private gun ownership.

isis as well opposes private gun ownership

 

[KGB]

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

IF:
"Guns don't kill people; people kill people"...

THEN:
"Guns don't make one safer; people make one safer".

Think about it.

/thread

You're dumber than a bag of hammers.

So ---- you read it TWICE and still didn't get it?

Did I use too-big words?

Where nonsense is, there's nothing to get.

But there is where logic is.

Look, if you really insist on playing so stupid that you can't comprehend this..... look at the first sentence:

IF "Guns don't kill people; people kill people" --- the person, not the object, is the actor.

THEN: "Guns don't keep people safe; people keep people safe --- SAME THING.

GET IT YET HUNIOR? YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS.

Fucking retard.

Guns keep people safe because other people are dangerous....

 

[OKTexas]

If it actually does come down to Trump and Hillary, Trump will absolutely shred her on hypocrisy on this issue

I don't know, he blew the hell out of a simple abortion question.