Sure it does. You asked if we want to elect someone with such low likability, implying that such a condition rather disqualifies a candidate from consideration.
First, I pointed out that low likability is fixable. Second, I pointed out that the opposition is worse.
So, unless you were setting up for endorsing voting for a third party, which I dealt with in my final point, then what is your alternative? Not to vote?
Sent from my 5054N using Tapatalk
I haven't decided yet how I will vote, only that I will not vote for Hillary. I really don't think her likability is fixable. She's had decades to improve it, and it's only gotten worse. In fact, it seems that the more exposure she gets, the less likable she is.
That's
demonstrably not true.
Hew approval ratings have ebbed, and flowed over the years, and there is no reason to believe she cannot bring those numbers up again.
And "...only that I will not vote for Hillary..." leaves only three options: the orangutan-haired Carnival Barker, who's liability numbers are even lower than Hillary's, so, by the standard you are presenting, he is also not a viable option, third party vote, which I explained the futility of, or not voting, which is as bad, if not worse, than voting third party.
