PGreen
Active Member
- Nov 24, 2014
- 263
- 44
- 33
They have called Senator Elizabeth Warren “an extremely attractive candidate” in the 2016 presidential campaign. They have said that she is the “hottest commodity” in the Democratic Party and that she has demonstrated the “passion and intensity” that Hillary Rodham Clinton lacks.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/29/u...n-could-be-a-dream-match-for-republicans.html
What?! Seriously? How is it that the Democrats see only Clinton and Warren as 2016 possibilities? When did we get tunnel vision? And when did we limit our search to the very highest echelons of government service?
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/29/u...n-could-be-a-dream-match-for-republicans.html
What?! Seriously? How is it that the Democrats see only Clinton and Warren as 2016 possibilities? When did we get tunnel vision? And when did we limit our search to the very highest echelons of government service?