What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Hillary Clinton vs. Elizabeth Warren Could Delight Republicans

PGreen

Active Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2014
Messages
263
Reaction score
44
Points
33
They have called Senator Elizabeth Warren “an extremely attractive candidate” in the 2016 presidential campaign. They have said that she is the “hottest commodity” in the Democratic Party and that she has demonstrated the “passion and intensity” that Hillary Rodham Clinton lacks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/29/u...n-could-be-a-dream-match-for-republicans.html


What?! Seriously? How is it that the Democrats see only Clinton and Warren as 2016 possibilities? When did we get tunnel vision? And when did we limit our search to the very highest echelons of government service?
 

Kosh

Quick Look Over There!
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
24,717
Reaction score
2,650
Points
280
Location
Everywhere but nowhere
The far left will not let Hilary be the nomination unless they have no other choice.
 

occupied

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2011
Messages
28,328
Reaction score
9,043
Points
900
They have called Senator Elizabeth Warren “an extremely attractive candidate” in the 2016 presidential campaign. They have said that she is the “hottest commodity” in the Democratic Party and that she has demonstrated the “passion and intensity” that Hillary Rodham Clinton lacks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/29/u...n-could-be-a-dream-match-for-republicans.html


What?! Seriously? How is it that the Democrats see only Clinton and Warren as 2016 possibilities? When did we get tunnel vision? And when did we limit our search to the very highest echelons of government service?

I hope Warren runs for a little while just to remind Hillary what a real progressive is supposed to be.
 

Kosh

Quick Look Over There!
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
24,717
Reaction score
2,650
Points
280
Location
Everywhere but nowhere
They have called Senator Elizabeth Warren “an extremely attractive candidate” in the 2016 presidential campaign. They have said that she is the “hottest commodity” in the Democratic Party and that she has demonstrated the “passion and intensity” that Hillary Rodham Clinton lacks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/29/u...n-could-be-a-dream-match-for-republicans.html


What?! Seriously? How is it that the Democrats see only Clinton and Warren as 2016 possibilities? When did we get tunnel vision? And when did we limit our search to the very highest echelons of government service?

I hope Warren runs for a little while just to remind Hillary what a real progressive is supposed to be.

Proof that the far left drones will not let Hilary be the nomination..
 

Mac1958

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2011
Messages
88,592
Reaction score
32,861
Points
2,280
Location
Opposing Authoritarian Ideological Fundamentalism.
.

Admittedly I don't fully understand the behaviors of partisans, but this almost nonchalant confidence the GOP has regarding 2016 is a mystery.

The congressional deck was stacked in their favor in 2014, it goes against them in 2016, and the electoral college presents a real challenge.

.
 

jwoodie

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
14,925
Reaction score
3,588
Points
280
Aside from her views, Warren is an extremely attractive candidate. I wish the GOP had one.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$191.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top