Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,832
- 350
Look, I fucked up and got a US ambassador and three other Americans killed, and then blamed the whole thing on some guy's video when we knew all along it was a preplanned terror attack, but I'm really really really sorry, so you can't hold it against me come election time.
Every time they lied, the truth came out. And every time the truth came out, they told another lie. The sheeple ate it up and didn't catch on to the many story changes.
Let's recap.
First day. The initial lie was that the reason the ambassador and three others were killed was a sudden, unplanned attack by protesters upset by a video. (a video that, at that time, had not even been translated into Arabic yet)
Fail.
Next excuse was that terrorists were involved, but there was no time to send help.
Fail.
Next excuse was that there was time to help, but the Libyan officials denied entry into air space.
Fail.
Finally, they fell back on their usual excuse. They said it was Republicans fault for proposing cuts.
That didn't explain any of the previous lies, nor did the lame excuse hold any water. No way in hell would money get in the way if they had wanted to protect our people.
Hillary needs to be asked direct questions and pressed for answers.
Why were direct threats to Steven's life ignored?
Why were so many previous attacks in the area ignored, especially in light of the 9/11 anniversary approaching?
Why didn't we send help since no one could have known how long the attack would last?
Why were the people that were ready to act told to stand down?
Why was a general fired on the spot for thinking stand down orders were a mistake and intending to act anyway?
Why were the survivors hauled off to a remote location and not interviewed by the press?
Why were survivors forced to sign non-disclosure agreements?
Why was the administration silent for almost a year after their initial lies were exposed?
Most of all, since we know that no intel suggested protesters and those present at the briefing stated it was declared an act of terrorism from the start, who in the hell came up with the false story about the protester? And why did Hillary tell family members of the slain victims that they would get the filmmaker instead promising to find the people actually responsible?
Why on earth would the administration go to such great lengths to hide the fact that radical Muslim terrorists planned an attack on our people?
Last edited:
