Hillary Clinton lies about Congressional subpoena.

[Oldstyle]

Then take a crack at explaining why Clinton would erase thousands of e-mails that she had to have known those Congressional investigators wanted to see if there was nothing politically harmful in them?

 

[Oldstyle]

Franco is now claiming that Clinton only had "private" e-mails on the server at her house. The truth is that Clinton did ALL of her e-mails both private and for the State Department through that same server. Now why would someone break State Department regulations that specifically prohibit that? Why would they want to control access to their State Department e-mails when they know that's against policy?

 

[francoHFW]

Nobody in their right mind cares about your propaganda only bs committee and the non-existant e-mail scandal about a non-existant Bengazi scandal, hater dupe.

 

[Papageorgio]

Nobody in their right mind cares about your propaganda only bs committee and the non-existant e-mail scandal about a non-existant Bengazi scandal, hater dupe.

Hey Franco, how is our resident hater dupe doing today?

 

[francoHFW]

Idiotic talking points and stupid insults from the dupes and Pubtrolls...

 

[Oldstyle]

Nobody in their right mind cares about your propaganda only bs committee and the non-existant e-mail scandal about a non-existant Bengazi scandal, hater dupe.

Yeah, why would anyone "care" that our Secretary of State was deliberately hiding information about how she did her job from the very people who are supposed to oversee how she does her job? There is a REASON why laws were passed to prevent those in the Executive branch from doing just that...and Hillary Clinton's behavior throughout this entire debacle is exactly why a need for such laws was seen in the first place.

 

[Oldstyle]

Nobody in their right mind cares about your propaganda only bs committee and the non-existant e-mail scandal about a non-existant Bengazi scandal, hater dupe.

Hey Franco, how is our resident hater dupe doing today?

He's working on his dissertation!

 

[usmcstinger]

cl

After she left the post; a subpoena was served on THE DEPARTMENT. Not on Clinton. Evidently you do not fact check your statements. The subpoena was to Hillary. The subpoena is on line dumb one. Read it.

link?

Find it yourself. If you can't, get a kid in 6th grade to help you. Are you really this Dysfunctional ?

You just don't want to produce it because you know it was sent via e-mail and never handed directly to Clinton. There is proof it was sent to a lawyers office, but no proof Clinton ever saw it.
There was no request in the subpoena for Clinton to show up anywhere. That portion of the subpoena is left blank. The materials requested were turned over on time. There was no reason for Clinton to have any knowledge of the alleged subpoena.

The Bottom Line is she knew she had been served. The end!

 

[Camp]

cl

After she left the post; a subpoena was served on THE DEPARTMENT. Not on Clinton. Evidently you do not fact check your statements. The subpoena was to Hillary. The subpoena is on line dumb one. Read it.

link?

Find it yourself. If you can't, get a kid in 6th grade to help you. Are you really this Dysfunctional ?

You just don't want to produce it because you know it was sent via e-mail and never handed directly to Clinton. There is proof it was sent to a lawyers office, but no proof Clinton ever saw it.
There was no request in the subpoena for Clinton to show up anywhere. That portion of the subpoena is left blank. The materials requested were turned over on time. There was no reason for Clinton to have any knowledge of the alleged subpoena.

The Bottom Line is she knew she had been served. The end!

The bottom line is a good lawyer would have kept her in the dark if there was plausible deniability for her receiving the subpoena. It is only a biased opinion that she received the subpoena. Thing about subpoenas is that you have to prove the party received one before you can take any action against them.

 

[Papageorgio]

Idiotic talking points and stupid insults from the dupes and Pubtrolls...

Love you too franky, you seem cranky, what's the prob wife not givin you hanky panky?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Papageorgio]

cl

After she left the post; a subpoena was served on THE DEPARTMENT. Not on Clinton. Evidently you do not fact check your statements. The subpoena was to Hillary. The subpoena is on line dumb one. Read it.

link?

Find it yourself. If you can't, get a kid in 6th grade to help you. Are you really this Dysfunctional ?

You just don't want to produce it because you know it was sent via e-mail and never handed directly to Clinton. There is proof it was sent to a lawyers office, but no proof Clinton ever saw it.
There was no request in the subpoena for Clinton to show up anywhere. That portion of the subpoena is left blank. The materials requested were turned over on time. There was no reason for Clinton to have any knowledge of the alleged subpoena.

The Bottom Line is she knew she had been served. The end!

The bottom line is a good lawyer would have kept her in the dark if there was plausible deniability for her receiving the subpoena. It is only a biased opinion that she received the subpoena. Thing about subpoenas is that you have to prove the party received one before you can take any action against them.

Bullshit, he is obligated to let her know, he can't withhold a subpoena. It's a court order and as such has an obligation to in form the client.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk