Hillary Clinton is not a viable candidate.

[Blackrook]

Trumps biggest problem is more than just Hillary, but his own party does not support him

This will give him a poor turnout in areas he needs it most and cripple those lower on the Republican ticket

The problem with that theory is that more people voted for Trump than any previous Republican primary candidate.

IT'S OFFICIAL: DONALD TRUMP Breaks Bush Record With Most Votes Ever for Republican Primary Candidate

Also, Republican turnout in the primaries was the highest since 1980:

Turnout was high in the 2016 primary season, but just short of 2008 record

Maybe you should do a little research into the facts before making your half-cocked predictions. Google is your friend.

 

[auditor0007]

Republicans would be wise to select someone that believe in investing in America and seriously challenging china on doing so before they top us. Once they do they'll probably invade.

Why in the world would China invade us?

 

[auditor0007]

Trumps biggest problem is more than just Hillary, but his own party does not support him

This will give him a poor turnout in areas he needs it most and cripple those lower on the Republican ticket

The problem with that theory is that more people voted for Trump than any previous Republican primary candidate.

IT'S OFFICIAL: DONALD TRUMP Breaks Bush Record With Most Votes Ever for Republican Primary Candidate

Also, Republican turnout in the primaries was the highest since 1980:

Turnout was high in the 2016 primary season, but just short of 2008 record

Maybe you should do a little research into the facts before making your half-cocked predictions. Google is your friend.

Trump received most votes ever for a Republican nominee. He also received the most votes against him.

 

[Vigilante]

 

[rightwinger]

Trumps biggest problem is more than just Hillary, but his own party does not support him

This will give him a poor turnout in areas he needs it most and cripple those lower on the Republican ticket

The problem with that theory is that more people voted for Trump than any previous Republican primary candidate.

IT'S OFFICIAL: DONALD TRUMP Breaks Bush Record With Most Votes Ever for Republican Primary Candidate

Also, Republican turnout in the primaries was the highest since 1980:

Turnout was high in the 2016 primary season, but just short of 2008 record

Maybe you should do a little research into the facts before making your half-cocked predictions. Google is your friend.

More people voted for Hillary

Trump can win red states but he needs a big turnout in swing states. He lacks the political base to do it

 

[rightwinger]

Hillary is taking a 50 state attack to Donald Trump

Not satisfied with just Swing States, Hillary will attack Red States like Texas, S Carolina, Indiana, Georgia, Arizona as she will force Trump to waste resources and win Congressional seats for the Dems

Hillary has all the charisma and people skills of the Wicked Witch of the West. Also, she refuses to talk to reporters about anything. Do you think she can just refuse to talk to reporters indefinitely if she is elected President?

Only to Conservatives. You hate her, but then again you hate anyone from the left

 

[Blackrook]

Trumps biggest problem is more than just Hillary, but his own party does not support him

This will give him a poor turnout in areas he needs it most and cripple those lower on the Republican ticket

The problem with that theory is that more people voted for Trump than any previous Republican primary candidate.

IT'S OFFICIAL: DONALD TRUMP Breaks Bush Record With Most Votes Ever for Republican Primary Candidate

Also, Republican turnout in the primaries was the highest since 1980:

Turnout was high in the 2016 primary season, but just short of 2008 record

Maybe you should do a little research into the facts before making your half-cocked predictions. Google is your friend.

More people voted for Hillary

Trump can win red states but he needs a big turnout in swing states. He lacks the political base to do it

All previous predictions that Trump would fail have not come true. One by one, he picked off all of his Republican opponents.

Hillary, on the other hand, had no real competition, just a crazy old coot socialist who was more to the left than George McGovern. Even despite that, he held on until the end, AND she had to commit major voter fraud to beat him.

 

[rightwinger]

Trumps biggest problem is more than just Hillary, but his own party does not support him

This will give him a poor turnout in areas he needs it most and cripple those lower on the Republican ticket

The problem with that theory is that more people voted for Trump than any previous Republican primary candidate.

IT'S OFFICIAL: DONALD TRUMP Breaks Bush Record With Most Votes Ever for Republican Primary Candidate

Also, Republican turnout in the primaries was the highest since 1980:

Turnout was high in the 2016 primary season, but just short of 2008 record

Maybe you should do a little research into the facts before making your half-cocked predictions. Google is your friend.

More people voted for Hillary

Trump can win red states but he needs a big turnout in swing states. He lacks the political base to do it

All previous predictions that Trump would fail have not come true. One by one, he picked off all of his Republican opponents.

Hillary, on the other hand, had no real competition, just a crazy old coot socialist who was more to the left than George McGovern. Even despite that, he held on until the end, AND she had to commit major voter fraud to beat him.

Low information voters

It is now that Hillary has no competition

 

[jwoodie]

Trumps biggest problem is more than just Hillary, but his own party does not support him

This will give him a poor turnout in areas he needs it most and cripple those lower on the Republican ticket

The problem with that theory is that more people voted for Trump than any previous Republican primary candidate.

IT'S OFFICIAL: DONALD TRUMP Breaks Bush Record With Most Votes Ever for Republican Primary Candidate

Also, Republican turnout in the primaries was the highest since 1980:

Turnout was high in the 2016 primary season, but just short of 2008 record

Maybe you should do a little research into the facts before making your half-cocked predictions. Google is your friend.

More people voted for Hillary

Trump can win red states but he needs a big turnout in swing states. He lacks the political base to do it

All previous predictions that Trump would fail have not come true. One by one, he picked off all of his Republican opponents.

Hillary, on the other hand, had no real competition, just a crazy old coot socialist who was more to the left than George McGovern. Even despite that, he held on until the end, AND she had to commit major voter fraud to beat him.

Low information voters

It is now that Hillary has no competition

Credibility is not established by mere repetition.

 

[mamooth]

Then, by all means, show us something credible. That is, show us Trump's path to victory. With numbers backing it up, instead of just wishful thinking.

 

[jwoodie]

Then, by all means, show us something credible. That is, show us Trump's path to victory. With numbers backing it up, instead of just wishful thinking.

Sweeping predictions four months before the elections are inherently suspect. Particularly in this year, external events may have huge impacts on who votes and how they vote. Further, the Electoral College may end up further at odds with the popular vote than at any time since 1860. I would wait until at least after the Conventions before engaging in any serious predictive analysis.

 

[rightwinger]

Then, by all means, show us something credible. That is, show us Trump's path to victory. With numbers backing it up, instead of just wishful thinking.

Sweeping predictions four months before the elections are inherently suspect. Particularly in this year, external events may have huge impacts on who votes and how they vote. Further, the Electoral College may end up further at odds with the popular vote than at any time since 1860. I would wait until at least after the Conventions before engaging in any serious predictive analysis.

I expect Trump to draw even or move slightly ahead after the GOP convention. Hillary will take back her lead after the Democratic convention and never look back

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[rightwinger]

Yes....seems like Conservatives are out of step with the rest of the world once again

Just like they are on global warming, guns, capital punishment, the UN, Nobel Prize, evolution.....

 

[jwoodie]

As usual, the irony escapes you: If these two are admired "just to piss off the haters," there must be very little else to admire them for. And their admirers must be morons.

 

[Dot Com]

Hillary Clinton is not a viable candidate. The Democrats should toss out the broken process that got her the nomination and have a brokered convention. They should find someone, preferably a moderate Democrat with a record of honesty, and nominate him or her.

The plain fact is, the rank-and-file Democrat is too stupid to pick their own candidates.

I would also say the same thing about Republicans and Trump. Republicans should toss him out and find a normal person to run for President on the Republican ticket.

The system is a proven failure when it comes up with two ass-clowns like Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

As for me, I will vote for Trump if I absolutely have to. But I won't like it, and I will spend the next four years regretting it.

I agree. she stands for everything that this great nation has rebuked in this election cycle.

 

[jwoodie]

Yes....seems like Conservatives are out of step with the rest of the world once again

Just like they are on global warming, guns, capital punishment, the UN, Nobel Prize, evolution.....

Nobel Prize?

 

[rightwinger]

Yes....seems like Conservatives are out of step with the rest of the world once again

Just like they are on global warming, guns, capital punishment, the UN, Nobel Prize, evolution.....

Nobel Prize?

For some reason, Republicans never win one

Sour grapes make the finest whine

 

[Synthaholic]

As usual, the irony escapes you: If these two are admired "just to piss off the haters," there must be very little else to admire them for. And their admirers must be morons.

Since you're a conservative, reading comprehension issues are a given.

It pisses off you haters that they are both so widely admired around the world, unlike ANYONE in the Republican Party.

People around the world don't admire them in order to piss off you haters.

 

[Synthaholic]

Hillary Clinton is not a viable candidate. The Democrats should toss out the broken process that got her the nomination and have a brokered convention. They should find someone, preferably a moderate Democrat with a record of honesty, and nominate him or her.

The plain fact is, the rank-and-file Democrat is too stupid to pick their own candidates.

I would also say the same thing about Republicans and Trump. Republicans should toss him out and find a normal person to run for President on the Republican ticket.

The system is a proven failure when it comes up with two ass-clowns like Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump.

As for me, I will vote for Trump if I absolutely have to. But I won't like it, and I will spend the next four years regretting it.

I agree. she stands for everything that this great nation has rebuked in this election cycle.

Like what? She and Sanders agree on over 95% of the issues.