Hillary Clinton: How Bergdahl disappeared 'doesn't matter'

[Roadrunner]

makes ME wonder why context means NOTHING to RW's ..

"context". the guy deserted, joined the enemy, said he hated the USA, 6 americans died trying to get him back i.e. save him. The context is very very clear.

He is a hero to Obama and the Left.

That will never change.

The hell he is, dingbat dupe lynch mob twit lol.

We all saw Obama praise Bergdahl, and fondle his momma, while his cuckolded daddy looked on in shame.

I saw it on CNN, and Wuff don't allow lies.

Bergdahl DIDN'T serve with distinction yet was promoted to sergeant? You people are braindead.

Promotion was automatic, and will be revoked if he is convicted.

That said, we may see him getting a medal in the Bergdahl Garden, so Obama can paw his momma again.

 

[kaz]

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

 

[Roadrunner]

Obozo didn't "bring" anybody home. He negotiated with terrorists and made a deal. Give us our traitor and we'll give you 5 of your loyalists. THINK

right Bergdahl is still in Afghanistan and never got brought home...THINK.

Yes, he is back in the USA. The point is that obozo made a bad deal for him. ISIS out negotiated the great community organizer, now Iran is doing the same thing.

Obama is a light weight in the international arena, everyone makes him look like a fool.

Worst president in history, bar none.

You think he made a bad deal, but I think he made a very good deal.

They wanted 16 prisoners released, he settled for 5 prisoners being TRANSFERRED in to the custody of other countries, AND we got an American citizen in return.

HOORAY for Obama....on this one!

Those five Taliban were upper echelon Taliban. Not Mohammed six packs.

This trade was the equivalent of giving the Nazis back five Generals during WWII.

Edit to add: The country they were sent to was Qatar. The only country to date that has actually built a Taliban Embassy aka an Embassy for terrorists.

I doubt if those five whatever, are equivalent to five German WWII generals.

No, Nazi generals bathed regularly.

 

[Skylar]

Treason doesn't matter to this *****. I don't think we should elect her to office.

Actual treason? Or the batshit right wing echo chamber 'treason' that many conservatives imagine?

They aren't the same thing. Nor do they have equal relevance in electing someone to office.

 

[Skylar]

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

Which 'terrorists' are you referring to? Was the time they were sentenced to as part of their trial up? Or were they released earlier than the judge and jury in their case affirmed they must serve?

 

[Care4all]

I don't think for one nano second that he made a bad deal...He did the RIGHT thing in bringing this American home, whether an alleged deserter or not. If he is being charged as a deserter now, I STILL know Obama followed protocol and "left no man behind''....
...

Obozo didn't "bring" anybody home. He negotiated with terrorists and made a deal. Give us our traitor and we'll give you 5 of your loyalists. THINK

right Bergdahl is still in Afghanistan and never got brought home...THINK.

Yes, he is back in the USA. The point is that obozo made a bad deal for him. ISIS out negotiated the great community organizer, now Iran is doing the same thing.

Obama is a light weight in the international arena, everyone makes him look like a fool.

Worst president in history, bar none.

You think he made a bad deal, but I think he made a very good deal.

They wanted 16 prisoners released, he settled for 5 prisoners being TRANSFERRED in to the custody of other countries, AND we got an American citizen in return.

HOORAY for Obama....on this one!

Those five Taliban were upper echelon Taliban. Not Mohammed six packs.

This trade was the equivalent of giving the Nazis back five Generals during WWII.

Edit to add: The country they were sent to was Qatar. The only country to date that has actually built a Taliban Embassy aka an Embassy for terrorists.

Nope! They were not even close to being anything remotely near the equivalent of 5 nazi generals....tiny.....

That is a HUGE EXAGERATION....and far from the truth.

 

[tinydancer]

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

Which 'terrorists' are you referring to? Was the time they were sentenced to as part of their trial up? Or were they released earlier than the judge and jury in their case affirmed they must serve?

These terrorists aka Taliban commanders are very well known. One that was released was wanted by the United Nations for war crimes.

"A senior U.S. defense official confirmed Saturday that the prisoners to be released include Mullah Mohammad Fazl, Mullah Norullah Noori, Abdul Haq Wasiq, Khairullah Khairkhwa and Mohammed Nabi Omari.

While not as well known as Guantanamo inmates like 9-11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the Taliban 5 were some of the worst outlaws in the U.S. war on terror.

And their release will end up replenishing the diminished leadership ranks of the Afghan Taliban at a moment when the United States is winding down the war there.

“They are undoubtedly among the most dangerous Taliban commanders held at Guantanamo,” said Thomas Joscelyn, a senior editor at the Long War Journal who keeps a close watch on developments concerning the detainees left at the Guantanamo Bay prison.

Fazl, for example, was the Taliban’s former deputy defense minister and is wanted by the United Nations for his role in massacres targeting Afghan’s Shi’ite Muslim population."

More at link:

Here are the Taliban Terrorists Obama Released to Free POW Bowe Bergdahl - The Daily Beast

 

[Care4all]

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

Which 'terrorists' are you referring to? Was the time they were sentenced to as part of their trial up? Or were they released earlier than the judge and jury in their case affirmed they must serve?

These terrorists aka Taliban commanders are very well known. One that was released was wanted by the United Nations for war crimes.

"A senior U.S. defense official confirmed Saturday that the prisoners to be released include Mullah Mohammad Fazl, Mullah Norullah Noori, Abdul Haq Wasiq, Khairullah Khairkhwa and Mohammed Nabi Omari.

While not as well known as Guantanamo inmates like 9-11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the Taliban 5 were some of the worst outlaws in the U.S. war on terror.

And their release will end up replenishing the diminished leadership ranks of the Afghan Taliban at a moment when the United States is winding down the war there.

“They are undoubtedly among the most dangerous Taliban commanders held at Guantanamo,” said Thomas Joscelyn, a senior editor at the Long War Journal who keeps a close watch on developments concerning the detainees left at the Guantanamo Bay prison.

Fazl, for example, was the Taliban’s former deputy defense minister and is wanted by the United Nations for his role in massacres targeting Afghan’s Shi’ite Muslim population."

More at link:

Here are the Taliban Terrorists Obama Released to Free POW Bowe Bergdahl - The Daily Beast

Total bull tiny, find a better source..... true on the UN wanted guy but also exaggerated....but the other guys were minions.

 

[tinydancer]

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

Which 'terrorists' are you referring to? Was the time they were sentenced to as part of their trial up? Or were they released earlier than the judge and jury in their case affirmed they must serve?

These terrorists aka Taliban commanders are very well known. One that was released was wanted by the United Nations for war crimes.

"A senior U.S. defense official confirmed Saturday that the prisoners to be released include Mullah Mohammad Fazl, Mullah Norullah Noori, Abdul Haq Wasiq, Khairullah Khairkhwa and Mohammed Nabi Omari.

While not as well known as Guantanamo inmates like 9-11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the Taliban 5 were some of the worst outlaws in the U.S. war on terror.

And their release will end up replenishing the diminished leadership ranks of the Afghan Taliban at a moment when the United States is winding down the war there.

“They are undoubtedly among the most dangerous Taliban commanders held at Guantanamo,” said Thomas Joscelyn, a senior editor at the Long War Journal who keeps a close watch on developments concerning the detainees left at the Guantanamo Bay prison.

Fazl, for example, was the Taliban’s former deputy defense minister and is wanted by the United Nations for his role in massacres targeting Afghan’s Shi’ite Muslim population."

More at link:

Here are the Taliban Terrorists Obama Released to Free POW Bowe Bergdahl - The Daily Beast

Total bull tiny, find a better source..... true on the UN wanted guy but also exaggerated....but the other guys were minions.

The Pentagon dossiers released by wikileaks on these Taliban leaders aren't good enough for you?

You don't believe the Pentagon?

 

[kaz]

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

Which 'terrorists' are you referring to? Was the time they were sentenced to as part of their trial up? Or were they released earlier than the judge and jury in their case affirmed they must serve?

The Constitution isn't a world document, Homey, it's an American one. You pompous, self absorbed Americans who think your shit doesn't stink and you make the rules for the world are pathetic, no wonder everyone hates you

 

[Skylar]

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

Which 'terrorists' are you referring to? Was the time they were sentenced to as part of their trial up? Or were they released earlier than the judge and jury in their case affirmed they must serve?

The Constitution isn't a world document, Homey, it's an American one. You pompous, self absorbed Americans who think your shit doesn't stink and you make the rules for the world are pathetic, no wonder everyone hates you

So clearly you've wiped your ass with the constitution. With that settled, lets look at US and international law. Where does indefinite detention with NO charges , NO trial and NO conviction for ANY crime fit into either?

Because I'd argue its anti-thetical to the US constitution, US law, international law, and the very concept of law.

 

[francoHFW]

"context". the guy deserted, joined the enemy, said he hated the USA, 6 americans died trying to get him back i.e. save him. The context is very very clear.

He is a hero to Obama and the Left.

That will never change.

The hell he is, dingbat dupe lynch mob twit lol.

We all saw Obama praise Bergdahl, and fondle his momma, while his cuckolded daddy looked on in shame.

I saw it on CNN, and Wuff don't allow lies.

Bergdahl DIDN'T serve with distinction yet was promoted to sergeant? You people are braindead.

Promotion was automatic, and will be revoked if he is convicted.

That said, we may see him getting a medal in the Bergdahl Garden, so Obama can paw his momma again.

Link?

 

[Skylar]

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

Which 'terrorists' are you referring to? Was the time they were sentenced to as part of their trial up? Or were they released earlier than the judge and jury in their case affirmed they must serve?

These terrorists aka Taliban commanders are very well known. One that was released was wanted by the United Nations for war crimes.

Then its gonna be remarkably simple for you to try and convict them of the crimes they commited, if its all 'well known'.

So did you?

 

[kaz]

So clearly you've wiped your ass with the constitution. With that settled, lets look at US and international law. Where does indefinite detention with NO charges , NO trial and NO conviction for ANY crime fit into either?

Because I'd argue its anti-thetical to the US constitution, US law, international law, and the very concept of law.

Here's an interesting word for you to google, Jurisdiction.

And ironically you blow the President who murders people as well as their families, friends, neighbors, the wrong targets and passer byes with drone strike then say that.

You are too tool to do anything but laugh at

 

[kaz]

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

Which 'terrorists' are you referring to? Was the time they were sentenced to as part of their trial up? Or were they released earlier than the judge and jury in their case affirmed they must serve?

These terrorists aka Taliban commanders are very well known. One that was released was wanted by the United Nations for war crimes.

Then its gonna be remarkably simple for you to try and convict them of the crimes they commited, if its all 'well known'.

So did you?

Yet you're silent (at best) on the KKK being denied cakes from blacks even when they haven't broken a law

 

[tinydancer]

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

Which 'terrorists' are you referring to? Was the time they were sentenced to as part of their trial up? Or were they released earlier than the judge and jury in their case affirmed they must serve?

These terrorists aka Taliban commanders are very well known. One that was released was wanted by the United Nations for war crimes.

Then its gonna be remarkably simple for you to try and convict them of the crimes they commited, if its all 'well known'.

So did you?

Good grief! I have no idea why they weren't prosecuted but what the hell does that have to do with their resumes which are stellar as far as the Taliban government and army went.

I put up a link to Pentagon dossiers on them. These were Taliban commanders.

High end Gitmo prisoners. Obama traded commanders in a time of war.

 

[Skylar]

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

Which 'terrorists' are you referring to? Was the time they were sentenced to as part of their trial up? Or were they released earlier than the judge and jury in their case affirmed they must serve?

These terrorists aka Taliban commanders are very well known. One that was released was wanted by the United Nations for war crimes.

Then its gonna be remarkably simple for you to try and convict them of the crimes they commited, if its all 'well known'.

So did you?

Yet you're silent (at best) on the KKK being denied cakes from blacks even when they haven't broken a law

What are you referring to? Specifically.

 

[Skylar]

Why would it

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

Which 'terrorists' are you referring to? Was the time they were sentenced to as part of their trial up? Or were they released earlier than the judge and jury in their case affirmed they must serve?

These terrorists aka Taliban commanders are very well known. One that was released was wanted by the United Nations for war crimes.

Then its gonna be remarkably simple for you to try and convict them of the crimes they commited, if its all 'well known'.

So did you?

Good grief! I have no idea why they weren't prosecuted but what the hell does that have to do with their resumes which are stellar as far as the Taliban government and army went.

I put up a link to Pentagon dossiers on them. These were Taliban commanders.

High end Gitmo prisoners. Obama traded commanders in a time of war.

So we have NO charges, NO trial, NO conviction, NO sentence.....but a decade of detention. And your beef with the situation wasn't the flagrant violation of the constitution, international law, or US law.......but that they weren't detained without charges, trial, conviction or sentence for LONGER?

Um, wow.

 

[Skylar]

So clearly you've wiped your ass with the constitution. With that settled, lets look at US and international law. Where does indefinite detention with NO charges , NO trial and NO conviction for ANY crime fit into either?

Because I'd argue its anti-thetical to the US constitution, US law, international law, and the very concept of law.

Here's an interesting word for you to google, Jurisdiction.

And ironically you blow the President who murders people as well as their families, friends, neighbors, the wrong targets and passer byes with drone strike then say that.

You are too tool to do anything but laugh at

Explain it to us. Tell us how jurisdiction made internment with no charges, no trial, no conviction, no sentence somehow 'okay'.

Or you could give us another one word answer and run. I'll be entertained either way.

 

[Care4all]

Maybe the military needs a review board of some type to decide which POW's should be brought home and which one's to leave behind? We left prisoners in Korea because they elected to stay, so maybe that equation should be added to the mix. We could require American POW's to fill out a questionnaire first before we bring them back, and then we get to vote. Damn that would be fun for board members.
Millions were spent to bring home our dead, perhaps that needs a review too?

Or maybe they could just do some due diligence before releasing terrorists

Which 'terrorists' are you referring to? Was the time they were sentenced to as part of their trial up? Or were they released earlier than the judge and jury in their case affirmed they must serve?

The Constitution isn't a world document, Homey, it's an American one. You pompous, self absorbed Americans who think your shit doesn't stink and you make the rules for the world are pathetic, no wonder everyone hates you

what country are you from, a citizen of....?