Hillary Clinton Called Trump "An Illegitimate President"

[Viktor]

>
>
> And now, the Democrats call Trump all sorts of names for doing the same thing for the 2020 election. Looks like a double standard.


From another source:

Hillary Clinton Labels Trump an ‘Illegitimate President’

 

[Moonglow]

Both sides do have a habit of doing what they claim the other side does..

 

[rightwinger]

She called him illegitimate because the Russians helped him

She never questioned the legitimacy of the election process

 

[eagle7-31]

She called him illegitimate because the Russians helped him

She never questioned the legitimacy of the election process

Still peddling the false Russian bs. LOL

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

>
>
> And now, the Democrats call Trump all sorts of names for doing the same thing for the 2020 election. Looks like a double standard.


From another source:

Hillary Clinton Labels Trump an ‘Illegitimate President’

There’s no ‘double standard’ – there is a false comparison fallacy.

Trump sought to overthrow the will of the people.

Trump incited a rightwing terrorist attack on America’s democracy.

Trump attempted to conspire with election officials to falsify voting records in his favor.

Trump has nothing but contempt for the Constitution, the rule of law, and our democratic institutions.

Democrats’ contempt for Trump is perfectly appropriate and warranted.

 

[jknowgood]

She called him illegitimate because the Russians helped him

She never questioned the legitimacy of the election process

Lol, it's been proven. There was no Russian collusion, in fact Hillary needs to be investigated over her involvement.

 

[Mac1958]

Holy crap! She's behaved just like Trump, exactly! Word for word! And that insurrection she lied her rubes into! That was TERRIBLE!

 

[forkup]

>
>
> And now, the Democrats call Trump all sorts of names for doing the same thing for the 2020 election. Looks like a double standard.


From another source:

Hillary Clinton Labels Trump an ‘Illegitimate President’

You think so? There is no question that Russia helped Trump get elected. Both the Mueller report and the investigation led by Ron Johnson confirmed it. Several people actually got indicted and convicted over precisely that fact. Which of course is the context in which Clinton said that. I've yet to see any evidence that Biden won by fraud or for that matter was helped by a foreign power.

A bigger and more substantial difference is one that there was no effort by the Democrats to change the outcome of the election. Although Obama undoubtedly knew about the efforts by Russia. Two, Clinton conceded within a few days

hillary concession speech - Search Videos

www.bing.com

It is simply a false equivalency.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Still peddling the false Russian bs. LOL

Trump was illegitimate because he was unfit to hold any public office.

 

[jknowgood]

There’s no ‘double standard’ – there is a false comparison fallacy.

Trump sought to overthrow the will of the people.

Trump incited a rightwing terrorist attack on America’s democracy.

Trump attempted to conspire with election officials to falsify voting records in his favor.

Trump has nothing but contempt for the Constitution, the rule of law, and our democratic institutions.

Democrats’ contempt for Trump is perfectly appropriate and warranted.

Hillary paid for the Steele dossiers, to try to throw the election.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Trump was illegitimate because he was unfit to hold any public office.

He beat your wrinkled old crow

 

[eagle7-31]

Trump was illegitimate because he was unfit to hold any public office.

Gospel according to the lying looney left.

 

[jknowgood]

You think so? There is no question that Russia helped Trump get elected. Both the Mueller report and the investigation led by Ron Johnson confirmed it. Several people actually got indicted and convicted over precisely that fact. Which of course is the context in which Clinton said that. I've yet to see any evidence that Biden won by fraud or for that matter was helped by a foreign power.

A bigger and more substantial difference is one that there was no effort by the Democrats to change the outcome of the election. Although Obama undoubtedly knew about the efforts by Russia. Two, Clinton conceded within a few days

hillary concession speech - Search Videos

www.bing.com

It is simply a false equivalency.

There was no Russian collusion, even Mueller said so.

 

[forkup]

Lol, it's been proven. There was no Russian collusion, in fact Hillary needs to be investigated over her involvement.

Feds: Russian hackers targeted election websites in Fla., Ga. and Iowa in 2016 elections

Two Russian intelligence officers named Friday in an indictment accusing them and 10 others with conducting a hacking campaign that targeted Democratic political organizations had snooped around state and local election-related websites in Florida, Iowa and Georgia.

eu.usatoday.com

The only thing that Mueller said was that the "collusion" you refer to would be hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt to have risen to criminal conspiracy with people of the Trump campaign. There isn't any dispute about the fact that Russia helped Trump to get elected.

 

[eagle7-31]

Feds: Russian hackers targeted election websites in Fla., Ga. and Iowa in 2016 elections

Two Russian intelligence officers named Friday in an indictment accusing them and 10 others with conducting a hacking campaign that targeted Democratic political organizations had snooped around state and local election-related websites in Florida, Iowa and Georgia.

eu.usatoday.com

The only thing that Mueller said was that the "collusion" you refer to would be hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt to have risen to criminal conspiracy with people of the Trump campaign. There isn't any dispute about the fact that Russia helped Trump to get elected.

Maybe in the minds of the looney left, otherwise no.

 

[forkup]

There was no Russian collusion, even Mueller said so.

File:Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election.pdf - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Here's a page from the Mueller report describing the efforts of the GRU

If you want I can also give you the pages showing the different ways the Trump campaign colluded from the same report. As I said, there's a difference between collusion and proving criminal conspiracy which has a legal meaning. The Trump campaign's activities fall under the term collusion. Mueller simply came to the conclusion that criminal conspiracy would be hard to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

[forkup]

Maybe in the minds of the looney left, otherwise no.

Looney is having people being indicted and convicted and claiming it didn't happen.

 

[Moonglow]

He beat your wrinkled old crow

and was then defeated by another old crow...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

and was then defeated by another old crow...

Trolling trolling trolling.


Please stop

 

[Viktor]

There’s no ‘double standard’ – there is a false comparison fallacy.

Trump sought to overthrow the will of the people.

ROTFL! The actual will of the voters was under dispute.
Protests of government action are legal.

Trump incited a rightwing terrorist attack on America’s democracy.

He called for a protest, which is protected by the Constitution.

Trump attempted to conspire with election officials to falsify voting records in his favor.

He asked a few to reconsider and look again

Trump has nothing but contempt for the Constitution, the rule of law, and our democratic institutions.

How come he has not been convicted of a crime?

Democrats’ contempt for Trump is perfectly appropriate and warranted.

It is childish hatred for a dissenter.