Dubya Da Last Repug Prez
Gold Member
- Oct 21, 2016
- 1,262
- 59
- 130
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #361
Hey dumb ass? The worst gerrymandering is done by order of the US Government thanks to liberals. To create "black" districts". Ohh and last I checked democrats when in power work to gerrymander to their benefit.If we can't agree on a national popular vote, what seems reasonable to me would be requiring states to distribute their electoral votes based on the popular vote within the state as Mane and Nebraska do. In that way, the electoral college is maintained, giving smaller states an edge in the electoral college but it makes voting within each state more democratic always giving the minority a chance to win electoral votes. More importantly, it will destroy the red state blue state mentality which has been so destructive to national unity. Each party would have to win the votes from each state. No state would be "in bag".It seems like in every presidential election now, only about a dozen or less battleground states really matter. The candidates ignore the other states and their issues. Other than fund raising trips, neither candidate had more than one rally in my state. I knew how my state was going to vote for president long before I knew who was nominated. It was a waste of time voting for president. At least there were local issues that really did matter.
I understand the pros and cons of our system but from my viewpoint the system makes voting for president a waste of time for most Americans. The solid blue states will go blue and the solid red states will go red leaving a handful battleground states to make the decision. And once elected the president will pay particular attention to those battleground states attempting to bring them into his corner in the next election.
Precisely -- if you're in a locked-red or locked-blue state, there's no reason to go to the polls other than your own state or local office elections. Doesn't matter if you vote with your state or against it --- it's already decided. That's one more deleterious effect of the EC -- it discourages the public getting involved.
You simply can't have a high voter turnout AND an indirect election like we and Pakistan have. Gotta pick one or the other. What we pretend to do here is just a sham.
That's been suggested. The issue with it is that Maine and Nebraska don't apportion their EVs according to the state's popular vote; they apportion them by Congressional district. And those are already, in many states including this one, artificial monstrosities far more divisively honed due to gerrymandering. So we'd get in many cases even more extremity of division, with intentionally-designed "deep red" districts and "deep blue" ones. That seems an enormous can of worms that would be easilly manipulated by whichever party has enough power in a given state to design those districts. They already manipulate them for advantage; this would invite them to make it even worse.
Republican gerrymandering will be the death knell of the Democratic Party, and the Democrats should have done a lot more to combat this problem a long time ago. Democrats will have to gain control of the states with the most ridiculous gerrymandered districts, such as North Carolina and Pennsylvania, and bring some sanity back to the district boundaries. Otherwise, the Repugs will permanently control the House of Representatives.
Wrong fuckhole. Look at the current districts in N. Carolina. The Repug state legislature has tried to incorporate the vast majority of African Americans into two or three districts, so that they can claim the rest of the districts for themselves.
You are appallingly and willfully uninformed. I would expect nothing less from a Repug goober lump of shit such as yourself.