I asked a question in the flame, no one seems to want to answer. I'll ask here.
Why ddi yall on the left scream like banshees when tea partiers allegedly used their first amendment right to scream racial epithets at certain law makers that they shouldn't be talking like that, but now that Muslims allegedly have a first amendment right to build this mosque and that NO ONE should be saying differently?
I will self ban for 30 days if anyone can post a legitimate explanation that does not reek of hypocrisy.
That's an easy one.
Did anyone suggest that "Tea Partiers" no longer should be allowed to assemble within 2 blocks of congress?
The answer, clearly, is "no". If anyone had suggested such a clear breach of the constitution, they would have been soundly railed against by everyone involved.
There's a clear difference between pointing out stupid, racist behavior, and attempting to abridge the right of a religion to build a house of worship.
But I do not want anyone to "ban themselves".