kiwiman127
Comfortably Moderate
Bill Clinton is the War on Women.....Romney is the War on Dogs?
Looking at some of the women Willie allegedly tried to boink, I think Willie also was involved in a War on Dogs!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bill Clinton is the War on Women.....Romney is the War on Dogs?
Bill Clinton is the War on Women.....Romney is the War on Dogs?
Looking at some of the women Willie allegedly tried to boink, I think Willie also was involved in a War on Dogs!
The difference is that the Clinton Scandal was already litigated and that horse has been beaten to death in the '90s.If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?

Obama goons ran an ad against Romney about his family dog riding on top of the car during a trip....that is big-time news to liberals compared to Bill Clinton getting BJs in the White House under Hillary's nose (well not under "her nose") in addition to sexual assaults against numerous other women going back to Arkansas.
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?
Which ones? Giggidy....

Bill Clinton is the War on Women.....Romney is the War on Dogs?
These far RW radicals don't think. That's their main problem.If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?
Are you talking about Monica Lewinski? You can talk about her but nobody cares, even at the height of that scandal, Bill Clinton's approval ratings were in the 70% range.
The lastest poll I could find was done by Fox News in April 2013, Bill Clinton- Favorable 71%-Unfavorable 25%.
Clinton: Favorability
Unbelievable but true. That's probably the reason why most experts think that going after Willie or even bringing Willie's thinking with his dick, would backfire. Obviously based on those numbers, it isn't just Dems/liberals who love the Billster.
These far RW radicals don't think. That's their main problem.Are you talking about Monica Lewinski? You can talk about her but nobody cares, even at the height of that scandal, Bill Clinton's approval ratings were in the 70% range.
The lastest poll I could find was done by Fox News in April 2013, Bill Clinton- Favorable 71%-Unfavorable 25%.
Clinton: Favorability
Unbelievable but true. That's probably the reason why most experts think that going after Willie or even bringing Willie's thinking with his dick, would backfire. Obviously based on those numbers, it isn't just Dems/liberals who love the Billster.
True but no one, especially the Democrats in congress, objected at the time. O'Neill and the rest were wildly in favor of that action.Don't just admit that Reagan sold weapons to terrorists. Just admit that Ronald Reagan and his cabinet (Bush Sr., Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, etc.) sold weapons and gave aid to the same terrorists that attacked the US on 9/11/01.Reagan sold weapons to terrorists.
Until Republicans admit that Ronald Reagan was a piece of shit, Republicans don't get to say anything bad about anyone.
Don't go away mad. Just go away.
OK, lets talk about her lying about Benghazi then.If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?
BILL Clinton isn't running for anything right now.
Now, if you want to go ahead and talk about Bill Clinton's girlfriends as a way to impugn Hillary Clinton in her attempt to run, feel free, but I just don't see what that gets you.
His wife was well aware of the extramarital affair before he played the disappearing act.As I recall Newt didn't fare too well in 2012. The GOP base will not easily forgive a candidate for being unfaithful to his wife. How can we expect someone to be honest with American voters when he can't even be honest with his own wife.It didn't hurt newt or vitter....so....nah
I guess Mark Sanford is a enigma?
As I recall Newt didn't fare too well in 2012. The GOP base will not easily forgive a candidate for being unfaithful to his wife. How can we expect someone to be honest with American voters when he can't even be honest with his own wife.
I guess Mark Sanford is a enigma?
An enigma wrapped up in a mystery inside a paradox.
OK, lets talk about her lying about Benghazi then.If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?
BILL Clinton isn't running for anything right now.
Now, if you want to go ahead and talk about Bill Clinton's girlfriends as a way to impugn Hillary Clinton in her attempt to run, feel free, but I just don't see what that gets you.
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?
libs are hypocrites who use double standards
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?
libs are hypocrites who use double standards
Or that we see cruelty to an animal being a more serious thing than relationships between consenting adults.
Clinton didn't push Monica down on her knees, she got on her knees voluntarily because that's what she wanted to do.
Poor old Seamus didn't ask to be strapped to the roof of a car.
But, as I said at the time, I'm vastly more upset about what Romney did to workers at AmPad, KB Toys and GS Steel.
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?