Hey Democrats, if it's OK to ...

If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?
The difference is that the Clinton Scandal was already litigated and that horse has been beaten to death in the '90s.

Not-so-much for the Romney dog-story, who practically know one knew about.

LOL!!!

You are one funny mofo.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Obama goons ran an ad against Romney about his family dog riding on top of the car during a trip....that is big-time news to liberals compared to Bill Clinton getting BJs in the White House under Hillary's nose (well not under "her nose") in addition to sexual assaults against numerous other women going back to Arkansas.

That was Gingrich running the ad.
 
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?

Which ones? Giggidy....
:lol:
lol

Screen+shot+2012-04-05+at+4.12.28+PM.png
 
Bill Clinton is the War on Women.....Romney is the War on Dogs?

There is a joke in there somewhere, but I will leave it to the imagination of others.

Then again which is worse leaving your dong on the roof of a car or eating dog like Obama has done?
 
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?

Are you talking about Monica Lewinski? You can talk about her but nobody cares, even at the height of that scandal, Bill Clinton's approval ratings were in the 70% range.

The lastest poll I could find was done by Fox News in April 2013, Bill Clinton- Favorable 71%-Unfavorable 25%.
Clinton: Favorability

Unbelievable but true. That's probably the reason why most experts think that going after Willie or even bringing Willie's thinking with his dick, would backfire. Obviously based on those numbers, it isn't just Dems/liberals who love the Billster.
These far RW radicals don't think. That's their main problem.
 
Are you talking about Monica Lewinski? You can talk about her but nobody cares, even at the height of that scandal, Bill Clinton's approval ratings were in the 70% range.

The lastest poll I could find was done by Fox News in April 2013, Bill Clinton- Favorable 71%-Unfavorable 25%.
Clinton: Favorability

Unbelievable but true. That's probably the reason why most experts think that going after Willie or even bringing Willie's thinking with his dick, would backfire. Obviously based on those numbers, it isn't just Dems/liberals who love the Billster.
These far RW radicals don't think. That's their main problem.

The irony of those comments from a far left Obama propaganda drone.
 
Reagan sold weapons to terrorists.

Until Republicans admit that Ronald Reagan was a piece of shit, Republicans don't get to say anything bad about anyone.

Don't go away mad. Just go away.
Don't just admit that Reagan sold weapons to terrorists. Just admit that Ronald Reagan and his cabinet (Bush Sr., Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, etc.) sold weapons and gave aid to the same terrorists that attacked the US on 9/11/01.
True but no one, especially the Democrats in congress, objected at the time. O'Neill and the rest were wildly in favor of that action.
 
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?

BILL Clinton isn't running for anything right now.

Now, if you want to go ahead and talk about Bill Clinton's girlfriends as a way to impugn Hillary Clinton in her attempt to run, feel free, but I just don't see what that gets you.
OK, lets talk about her lying about Benghazi then.
 
It didn't hurt newt or vitter....so....nah
As I recall Newt didn't fare too well in 2012. The GOP base will not easily forgive a candidate for being unfaithful to his wife. How can we expect someone to be honest with American voters when he can't even be honest with his own wife.

I guess Mark Sanford is a enigma?
His wife was well aware of the extramarital affair before he played the disappearing act.
 
As I recall Newt didn't fare too well in 2012. The GOP base will not easily forgive a candidate for being unfaithful to his wife. How can we expect someone to be honest with American voters when he can't even be honest with his own wife.

I guess Mark Sanford is a enigma?

An enigma wrapped up in a mystery inside a paradox.

He is indeed an enigma.

mark_enigma.jpg


Mark Sanford demands female voters insult him to his face, wrests control of cars from reporters, pushes his luck in South Carolina.
 
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?

BILL Clinton isn't running for anything right now.

Now, if you want to go ahead and talk about Bill Clinton's girlfriends as a way to impugn Hillary Clinton in her attempt to run, feel free, but I just don't see what that gets you.
OK, lets talk about her lying about Benghazi then.

Which lie was that? That it wasn't "really" about the movie?

Because, frankly, you guys change your story about why Benghazi was an 'outrage' every week, most folks stopped paying attention a long time ago.

Maybe if you stopped trying to turn Ambassador Stevens into the new Vince Foster, and talked about a compelling reason why an average working person should vote for any of the crazies you guys keep putting up, you might stand a reasonable chance.
 
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?



libs are hypocrites who use double standards
 
15th post
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?



libs are hypocrites who use double standards

Or that we see cruelty to an animal being a more serious thing than relationships between consenting adults.

Clinton didn't push Monica down on her knees, she got on her knees voluntarily because that's what she wanted to do.

Poor old Seamus didn't ask to be strapped to the roof of a car.

But, as I said at the time, I'm vastly more upset about what Romney did to workers at AmPad, KB Toys and GS Steel.
 
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?

Just for the record, I thought the Romney/dog was a non issue and ignorant. There were so many legit things to nail the guy on that it was a waste of time. Discussing Bill Clinton's affair is also ignorant. But, I get it. It's a diversionary tactic from actual issues.
 
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?



libs are hypocrites who use double standards

Or that we see cruelty to an animal being a more serious thing than relationships between consenting adults.

Clinton didn't push Monica down on her knees, she got on her knees voluntarily because that's what she wanted to do.

Poor old Seamus didn't ask to be strapped to the roof of a car.

But, as I said at the time, I'm vastly more upset about what Romney did to workers at AmPad, KB Toys and GS Steel.

Yeah yeah, everything is always all about you and what you feel

We've heard this crap over a million time ALREADY
 
If it's OK to talk about Romney's dog in the 80s, why isn't it OK to talk about Clinton's girlfriend in the 90s?

bill isn't running for office.

and i don't think you can tar hillary with that brush. it would just make people more sympathetic to her.

besides, no one cared about monica even then…. given he left office with almost a 70% approval rate

and whatever happened between him and monica, she said she went to washington to "get [her] presidential knee pads"… which she did. she never said it wasn't consensual and she never complained about it…. that was her "friend" linda tripp and her hack buddy publisher.

putting a dog on the roof of a car is an act of cruelty.

bill was just a horn dog.
 
Back
Top Bottom