WinterBorn
Diamond Member
UC for simply being unemployed means they can then afford rehab in a market friendly manner.Employment is at the will of either party. We should have no homeless problem in our first world economy.Not in our at-will employment States. That is the Whole and Entire Point.You keep missing the capital point. UC actually solves for economic phenomena under our form of Capitalism,unlike means tested welfare.Thanks for agreeing with me. UC is about compensating for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment to ensure more efficient market based arbitrage.Not at all. Demand and supply is what makes capitalism do what it does.Daniel, once again you disagree without disputing anything I posted. Sad.
That is absolutely right. If there is a demand for your labor, you will be properly compensated. If you offer nothing of value, you will not.
And yet, you insist on changing UC into welfare.
If the changes were made to UC that you want, there would be means tests added. If you want to have an income from tax dollars, you have to prove you need them.
Yes, it does. If you have the money to live, why would you receive our tax dollars? Tax dollars are monies that have been forcibly taken from workers and consumers.
Yeah, you have tried this before. Most homelessness is due to drug or alcohol problems or mental health issues. Sending them a check (to what address?) when they have no way of cashing it is ridiculous!
And you make that claim without addressing where the check is mailed, where the check is cashed, and how their money will be protected. And they will not go into rehab if they can continue to drink and do drugs on the tax payer's dime.