Really?
I did not say Jews have no crime rate. I said they have a low crime rate.
Stop your appropriation of the black race Joe. They may not like it or need you to hold their hand.
As if to suggest that blacks never get a second chance Joe...
Jews and Orientals were discriminated against when they came to the United States. Because most of them behaved and performed well they overcame that discrimination. Now most of them are more prosperous than most white Gentiles.
The wealth of the current generations was created fom the programs that excluded blacks in the 20th century. The initial wealth was created off the backs of my ancestors who worked for free. You don't know what the majority of blacks think. STOP BELIEVING YOU CAN TELL ME WHAT BLACKS THINK WHEN ITS REALLY WHAT YOU THINK. But here let me repost these things because your argument is baed on your racism, not anything else.
www.timesofisrael.com
It's not what was done yesterday, but what the new generations are doing to move this nation forward today is what counts. Face it, you are attempting to extort and steal from the new generation's based upon the past generation's antics, but you are too late because today's generational wealth being generated doesn't belong to you and/or it doesn't belong to any of your fellow travelers that think like you.The wealth of the current generations was created fom the programs that excluded blacks in the 20th century. The initial wealth was created off the backs of my ancestors who worked for free. You don't know what the majority of blacks think. STOP BELIEVING YOU CAN TELL ME WHAT BLACKS THINK WHEN ITS REALLY WHAT YOU THINK. But here let me repost these things because your argument is baed on your racism, not anything else.
We' ll start with this:
This is the part of Jewish history that dishonest heiffer Lisa won't tell you. It why the b won't debate me head up. she depends on pussies like you to launch pesonal attacks to make her wet, but as you are going to learn once gain, the truth defeats your little white --- juvenile attacks.
Obama administration earmarks $12m for Holocaust survivors
The Obama administration has awarded $12 million for assistance to Holocaust survivors.
The allocation from the Department of Health and Human Services to the Jewish Federations of North America, to be disbursed over five years, is part of an initiative launched in late 2013 by Vice President Joe Biden to address the needs of survivors in the United States, a quarter of whom live below the poverty line.
Combined with matching private funds, the approximately $2.5 million per year over the five years “will support $4.1 million in programming annually for organizations that help Holocaust survivors,” the JFNA said.
Obama administration earmarks $12m for Holocaust survivors
Funds to be distributed over five years; one-quarter of 130,000 US victims of Nazi persecution live under poverty line
So it's OK for the new generation to pay Jews for a war they didn't fight in and for damage created by a holocaust they did not commit.
Cobell v. Salazar was a landmark class action lawsuit filed by Native Americans against the U.S. government for mismanagement of Individual Indian Money (IIM) trust accounts, resulting in a historic $3.4 billion settlement.
Background
The case was initiated in 1996 by Elouise Cobell, a Blackfeet tribal member, along with other Native American representatives, against the U.S. Department of the Interior and the Department of the Treasury.
Plaintiffs alleged that the federal government had mismanaged trust funds and assets held for individual Native Americans, primarily derived from land transactions under the Dawes Act of 1887, which divided communal tribal lands into individual allotments and sold surplus lands to non-Native settlers.
Settlement
In 2009, the case was resolved with a $3.4 billion settlement, authorized by Congress through the Claims Resolution Act of 2010. The settlement included:
- $1.4 billion for individual Native American beneficiaries
- $2 billion to repurchase fractionated land interests and restore them to tribal ownership
- Creation of a scholarship fund for Native American and Alaska Native students funded by the repurchased lands.
Cobell v. Salazar - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
So it's OK for the new generation to pay Native Americans money for a damages caused by the 1887 Dawes Act.
I am quite sure no one living in 1980 was alive when the U.S. government made the Fort Laramie treaty with the Sioux Nation or were participants in Custers violation of that treaty. Nor were they alive when President Grant decided it was OK to let settlers and people prospecting for gold tresspass into land promised to the Sioux thereby violating the treaty. No one in 1980 was alive when the U.S. government decided to take the land from the Sioux by military force. No one in 1980 was alive when the U.S. government decided to cut off supplies they promised the Sioux as condition for their surrender after whipping the U.S. Army at The Battle of Little Bighorn. But in 1980, the government of the United States decided reparations were due to the Sioux Nation for what was done to them in the 1800’s. They awarded the Sioux nation 105 million dollars.
United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians :: 448 U.S. 371 (1980) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/448/371/
So it's OK for the new generation to pay Native Americans money for a damages caused by violating the Ft. Laramie Treaty of 1868.
That's just 3 the many cases where the govenment paid for past harms.
So you see white man, you run you mouth but you know nothing about the subject. If no one else had recieved reparations, we would not be asking for them. If this country worked the way you scum imagined it works, then we would not be asking for reparations but:
Black Reparations for Twentieth Century Federal Housing Discrimination:
The Construction of White Wealth and the Effects of Denied Black Homeownership
This year marks the 400th anniversary of the first documented arrival of Africans to the United States, which resulted in the enslavement of approximately 4 million Africans and their descendants in the United States between 1619 and 1865. On June 19, 2019—or “Juneteenth,” the holiday that celebrates the end of slavery in the United States—the U.S. House of Representatives held a hearing to discuss a reparations bill seeking to address the legacy of slavery and racism against African-Americans in the United States. The landmark reparations bill marks the first time since the Reconstruction Era nearly 150 years ago that Congress has reignited a “long overdue” national conversation on reparations. The purpose of the reparations bill was: “[t]o address the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery in the United States,” and to establish a commission to study and consider a national apology and proposal for reparations for the institution of slavery,
for subsequent “de jure and de facto” discrimination against African-Americans, and for the impact of such lasting “forces.”
Part I examines the U.S. government’s housing practices—from the New Deal until the 1968 Fair Housing Act and its 1988 Amendments—to reveal that although the New Deal’s national housing programs revolutionized homeownership and home equity in the United States, the U.S. government’s federal housing programs were racially discriminatory. Specifically, and quite shockingly, the U.S. government actively created and promulgated racist neighborhood rating systems that constructed black neighborhoods and black property as unstable, volatile, hazardous, and not worthy of investment. Using these racist rating systems, the federal government endorsed racial covenants and invested federal money into the creation and accumulation of white wealth, the value of whiteness, white suburbia, and white homeownership. Meanwhile, the government denied blacks federal housing funding, fueling black stigma and barring black-Americans from the invaluable twentieth century opportunities of homeownership and home equity.
Understanding the U.S. government’s discriminatory housing practices, Part II discusses and quantifies the effects of the government’s housing discrimination on black-American households and communities.
Finding that approximately 120 billion 1950s dollars—or more than 1.239 quintillion 2019 dollars—were invested to subsidize and create white-American wealth through homeownership
Black Reparations for Twentieth Century Federal Housing Discrimination: The Construction of White Wealth and the Effects of Denied Black Homeownership
This year marks the 400th anniversary of the first documented arrival of Africans to the United States, which resulted in the enslavement of approximately 4 milpapers.ssrn.com
This is money the federal government gave whites that my parents paid for, my grandparents paid for, and YOU have benefited from, whereas I did not get to. When you don't know what you are talking about, it is better to STFU. Now, of course, you and the other racists will hit the disagree or fake news button even though you bitches have been shown court cases, executive orders, and peer-reviewed documents. Your opposition will be based on nothing but your feelings and opinions as white racists. You mfs don't GAF about facts or truth. That's why you get called the lineage of evil. Because you MAGATS are the human personification of evil.
1) My parents, who were the children of poor, uneducated immigrants fleeing European antisemitism, got NOTHING that the blacks in their colleges also got.The wealth of the current generations was created fom the programs that excluded blacks in the 20th century. The initial wealth was created off the backs of my ancestors who worked for free. You don't know what the majority of blacks think. STOP BELIEVING YOU CAN TELL ME WHAT BLACKS THINK WHEN ITS REALLY WHAT YOU THINK. But here let me repost these things because your argument is baed on your racism, not anything else.
We' ll start with this:
This is the part of Jewish history that dishonest heiffer Lisa won't tell you. It why the b won't debate me head up. she depends on pussies like you to launch pesonal attacks to make her wet, but as you are going to learn once gain, the truth defeats your little white --- juvenile attacks.
Obama administration earmarks $12m for Holocaust survivors
The Obama administration has awarded $12 million for assistance to Holocaust survivors.
The allocation from the Department of Health and Human Services to the Jewish Federations of North America, to be disbursed over five years, is part of an initiative launched in late 2013 by Vice President Joe Biden to address the needs of survivors in the United States, a quarter of whom live below the poverty line.
Combined with matching private funds, the approximately $2.5 million per year over the five years “will support $4.1 million in programming annually for organizations that help Holocaust survivors,” the JFNA said.
Obama administration earmarks $12m for Holocaust survivors
Funds to be distributed over five years; one-quarter of 130,000 US victims of Nazi persecution live under poverty line
So it's OK for the new generation to pay Jews for a war they didn't fight in and for damage created by a holocaust they did not commit.
Cobell v. Salazar was a landmark class action lawsuit filed by Native Americans against the U.S. government for mismanagement of Individual Indian Money (IIM) trust accounts, resulting in a historic $3.4 billion settlement.
Background
The case was initiated in 1996 by Elouise Cobell, a Blackfeet tribal member, along with other Native American representatives, against the U.S. Department of the Interior and the Department of the Treasury.
Plaintiffs alleged that the federal government had mismanaged trust funds and assets held for individual Native Americans, primarily derived from land transactions under the Dawes Act of 1887, which divided communal tribal lands into individual allotments and sold surplus lands to non-Native settlers.
Settlement
In 2009, the case was resolved with a $3.4 billion settlement, authorized by Congress through the Claims Resolution Act of 2010. The settlement included:
- $1.4 billion for individual Native American beneficiaries
- $2 billion to repurchase fractionated land interests and restore them to tribal ownership
- Creation of a scholarship fund for Native American and Alaska Native students funded by the repurchased lands.
Cobell v. Salazar - Wikipedia
So it's OK for the new generation to pay Native Americans money for a damages caused by the 1887 Dawes Act.
I am quite sure no one living in 1980 was alive when the U.S. government made the Fort Laramie treaty with the Sioux Nation or were participants in Custers violation of that treaty. Nor were they alive when President Grant decided it was OK to let settlers and people prospecting for gold tresspass into land promised to the Sioux thereby violating the treaty. No one in 1980 was alive when the U.S. government decided to take the land from the Sioux by military force. No one in 1980 was alive when the U.S. government decided to cut off supplies they promised the Sioux as condition for their surrender after whipping the U.S. Army at The Battle of Little Bighorn. But in 1980, the government of the United States decided reparations were due to the Sioux Nation for what was done to them in the 1800’s. They awarded the Sioux nation 105 million dollars.
United States v. Sioux Nation of Indians :: 448 U.S. 371 (1980) :: Justia US Supreme Court Center, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/448/371/
So it's OK for the new generation to pay Native Americans money for a damages caused by violating the Ft. Laramie Treaty of 1868.
That's just 3 the many cases where the govenment paid for past harms.
So you see white man, you run you mouth but you know nothing about the subject. If no one else had recieved reparations, we would not be asking for them. If this country worked the way you scum imagined it works, then we would not be asking for reparations but:
Black Reparations for Twentieth Century Federal Housing Discrimination:
The Construction of White Wealth and the Effects of Denied Black Homeownership
This year marks the 400th anniversary of the first documented arrival of Africans to the United States, which resulted in the enslavement of approximately 4 million Africans and their descendants in the United States between 1619 and 1865. On June 19, 2019—or “Juneteenth,” the holiday that celebrates the end of slavery in the United States—the U.S. House of Representatives held a hearing to discuss a reparations bill seeking to address the legacy of slavery and racism against African-Americans in the United States. The landmark reparations bill marks the first time since the Reconstruction Era nearly 150 years ago that Congress has reignited a “long overdue” national conversation on reparations. The purpose of the reparations bill was: “[t]o address the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery in the United States,” and to establish a commission to study and consider a national apology and proposal for reparations for the institution of slavery,
for subsequent “de jure and de facto” discrimination against African-Americans, and for the impact of such lasting “forces.”
Part I examines the U.S. government’s housing practices—from the New Deal until the 1968 Fair Housing Act and its 1988 Amendments—to reveal that although the New Deal’s national housing programs revolutionized homeownership and home equity in the United States, the U.S. government’s federal housing programs were racially discriminatory. Specifically, and quite shockingly, the U.S. government actively created and promulgated racist neighborhood rating systems that constructed black neighborhoods and black property as unstable, volatile, hazardous, and not worthy of investment. Using these racist rating systems, the federal government endorsed racial covenants and invested federal money into the creation and accumulation of white wealth, the value of whiteness, white suburbia, and white homeownership. Meanwhile, the government denied blacks federal housing funding, fueling black stigma and barring black-Americans from the invaluable twentieth century opportunities of homeownership and home equity.
Understanding the U.S. government’s discriminatory housing practices, Part II discusses and quantifies the effects of the government’s housing discrimination on black-American households and communities.
Finding that approximately 120 billion 1950s dollars—or more than 1.239 quintillion 2019 dollars—were invested to subsidize and create white-American wealth through homeownership
Black Reparations for Twentieth Century Federal Housing Discrimination: The Construction of White Wealth and the Effects of Denied Black Homeownership
This year marks the 400th anniversary of the first documented arrival of Africans to the United States, which resulted in the enslavement of approximately 4 milpapers.ssrn.com
This is money the federal government gave whites that my parents paid for, my grandparents paid for, and YOU have benefited from, whereas I did not get to. When you don't know what you are talking about, it is better to STFU. Now, of course, you and the other racists will hit the disagree or fake news button even though you bitches have been shown court cases, executive orders, and peer-reviewed documents. Your opposition will be based on nothing but your feelings and opinions as white racists. You mfs don't GAF about facts or truth. That's why you get called the lineage of evil. Because you MAGATS are the human personification of evil.
Excellent point Lisa... He loves to tell white people that they don't speak for Black's, but you see how quick he becomes a hypocrite in the situation.
Jews get married first then have children. Blacks have baby mamas who are criminal factories
If blacks ever get reparations im going to open a liquor storeExcellent point Lisa... He loves to tell white people that they don't speak for Black's, but you see how quick he becomes a hypocrite in the situation.
White people made huge sacrifices in freeing the slaves, (because yes the nation was conquered by white Europeans before slavery), and it was the white Europeans that could either free them into the interior of the nation or deport them back to Africa where they had originated from. White Europeans decided not to deport, but rather to work the African now Americans into the system, and to recognize them as a freed people after a bloody Civil War was fought partly over their cause to help them into becoming now to this very day an Americanized free people.
IM2 is attempting to convince, and then extort a modern generation into thinking that it owes him and his buds something now, when no one owes him and his buds chit.
IM2 is the type of person that makes a white American scratch his or her head when thinking "what is it with this guy who thinks that he should become one of my dependents on my tax forms every year" ??
Only a few. The Mafia was nearly all Italian American.
There went that many I remember Bugsy Segal. Many Jews went into the fur business in NY and were forced out my the Mob
