Here's What's In HHS's Report on 'Gender-Affirming Care'

[Hollie]

No one is “taking action” on that 5 year old. Gender affirming care does not force anything on people.

Of course not dear. Then we can agree to end tranny story hour for children.

 

[Foxfyre]

The methods were wrong. You don’t start with a conclusion and find evidence to support it.

Show your evidence from a credible, non activist, source that provides evidence to dispute the methods.

 

[Leo123]

Approximately 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 4,500 births result in an individual with sex characteristics that do not fit typical binary notions of male or female, according to Wikipedia and The Intersex Society of North America. This is often referred to as intersex, meaning the individual has a variety of sex characteristics, including anatomy, chromosomes, or hormone production, that do not fit typical male or female definitions.

First of all, you are talking about maybe 1% of the American population. Second, there is no physical definition for 'intersex' it can mean whatever you want it to mean. Then you go on to further confuse and lie by saying 'intersex' means a 'variety of sex characteristics' which is equally meaningless. You cite made up terms by a group with an agenda and think you are somehow being smart when you sound like a low IQ person wishing to make more mutants.

 

[Marener]

Did you actually read the study? It was only friend support that reduced suicidality

Association of Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy With Depression, Thoughts of Suicide, and Attempted Suicide Among Transgender and Nonbinary Youth - PubMed

Findings support a relationship between access to GAHT and lower rates of depression and suicidality among transgender and nonbinary youth.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Marener]

Show your evidence from a credible, non activist, source that provides evidence to dispute the methods.

The HHS paper does not come from a credible, non-activist source, therefore it can be dismissed without further discussion.

 

[Foxfyre]

The methods were wrong. You don’t start with a conclusion and find evidence to support it.

Starting with an observation is not starting with a conclusion. Certainty is a huge word for any scientist and no reputable scientist will use that word other than very carefully and, as a result, very rarely.

But scientists observe something interesting to them and then try to find out as much as possible about that something. It is just as wrong to look for 'evidence' that disputes something and ignore all 'evidence' that doesn't do that as it is to look for 'evidence' that supports something and ignore all 'evidence' that disputes it.

 

[Rawley]

Association of Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy With Depression, Thoughts of Suicide, and Attempted Suicide Among Transgender and Nonbinary Youth - PubMed

Findings support a relationship between access to GAHT and lower rates of depression and suicidality among transgender and nonbinary youth.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Dude, now you're citing an online survey by a West Hollywood LGBT advocacy group.

We're done

 

[Marener]

We're done

I wish you had said that long ago.

 

[Marener]

Disrupting a normally functioning one sure as hell should matter more. Again, "do no harm"

Name one other medical procedure where a normally functioning system is disrupted, or a healthy organ or body part is removed?

I can think of only one, circumcision, and that doesn't change the function of the organ in question.

Hormonal contraception

 

[Foxfyre]

The HHS paper does not come from a credible, non-activist source, therefore it can be dismissed without further discussion.

How do you know that? Show your evidence that it is a not a credible, non-activist source. And that the Appendix describing it's methodology is flawed:

Loading…

opa.hhs.gov

 

[Marener]

How do you know that? Show your evidence that it is a not a credible, non-activist source. And that the Appendix describing it's methodology is flawed:

Loading…

opa.hhs.gov

It comes from the Trump administration. The Trump administration is not a credible, non-biased source.

 

[otto105]

Promoting, preaching, it's in the fucking word, "pride"

No, no it's not old fuckup.

 

[Hollie]

The HHS paper does not come from a credible, non-activist source, therefore it can be dismissed without further discussion.

Whatever you whine about, darlin’

 

[Hollie]

Hormonal contraception

In men?

 

[Rawley]

I wish you had said that long ago.

So do I. I thought you might have a rational argument. I was wrong.

 

[Foxfyre]

It comes from the Trump administration. The Trump administration is not a credible, non-biased source.

The report was reported by the Trump administration. They did not do the actual research but cite those who did. So try again to discredit the report without having a clue what you're talking about.

 

[Marener]

The report was reported by the Trump administration. They did not do the actual research but cite those who did. So try again to discredit the report without having a clue what you're talking about.

The Trump administration wrote the report. They did not publish the names of its authors.

Since the report was written by biased, unreliable sources, it is dismissed without further discussion.

 

[Hollie]

The Trump administration wrote the report. They did not publish the names of its authors.

Since the report was written by biased, unreliable sources, it is dismissed without further discussion.

The Trump administration did not write the report.

Your conspiracy theories are getting more ridiculous.

 

[Hollie]

The Trump administration wrote the report. They did not publish the names of its authors.

Since the report was written by biased, unreliable sources, it is dismissed without further discussion.

Since you offer no facts to support your lurid conspiracy theory, you are dismissed as just another loon.

 

[Marener]

The Trump administration did not write the report.

Who wrote the report?